A combined goal programming – AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 78, Issue , 2017, Pages 1410-1423

  Özcan, Evren Can ^a   Ünlüsoy, Sultan ^b   Eren, Tamer ^b  

^a Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources   (Turkey)

^b KIRIKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Goal programming (GP); Hydroelectric power plant; Maintenance strategy selection; Multi criteria decision making (MCDM); Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GOAL PROGRAMMING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS; MAINTENANCE;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; GOAL PROGRAMMING; GOAL-PROGRAMMING; IDEAL SOLUTIONS; MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES; MAINTENANCE STRATEGY SELECTION; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MULTICRITERION DECISION MAKINGS; STRATEGY SELECTION; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER OF PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTION;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS;

EID: 85020227749     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.039     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Özcan, E.C., Eren, T., Application of TOPSIS method for maintenance planning: natural gas combined cycle power plant case study. Int J Eng Res Dev 6:2 (2014), 1–13 [Turkish].
2. Özcan, E.C., Multiobjective optimization approach for electricity generation planning: case of Turkey [doctoral dissertation]. 2013, Gazi University, Ankara [Turkish].
3. Özcan, E.C., Maintenance management system: fundamentals of installation and operation. 2016, Electricity Generation Co, Ankara [Turkish].
4. Madu, C.N., Competing through maintenance strategies. Int J Qual Reliab 17:9 (2000), 937–948.
5. Mobley, R.K., An introduction to predictive maintenance. 2002, Buttherworth-Heinemann, Woburn.
6. Ding, S.H., Kamaruddin, S., Maintenance policy optimization—literature review and directions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76 (2015), 1263–1283.
7. Tan, M.T., Raghavan, N., Root cause analysis based maintenance policy. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 24:2 (2007), 203–228.
8. Lu, K.Y., Sy, C.C., A real-time decision-making of maintenance using fuzzy agent. Expert Syst Appl 36:2 (2009), 2691–2698.
9. Gupta, S., Maiti, J., Kumar, R., Kumar, U., A control chart guided maintenance policy selection. Int J Min Reclam Environ 23:3 (2009), 216–226.
10. Xia, T., Xi, L., Lee, J., Zhou, X., Optimal CBPM policy considering maintenance effects and environmental condition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56 (2011), 1181–1193.
11. Albayrak B Budget presentation for 2017. Republic of Turkey Minister of Energy and Natural Resources; 2017. [In Turkish].
12. Medium-term renewable energy market report 2015, market analysis and forecasts to 2020. International Energy Agency (IEA); 2016. ISSN: 2307-0293ISBN: 978-92-64-24367-5.
13. Renewables 2015 global status report. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN 21); 2016. ISBN: 978-3-9815934-6-4.
14. The 2012 technology roadmap for hydropower. International Energy Agency (IEA); 2012.
15. Başeşme, H., Hydroelectric power plants and facilities. 2003, Electricity Generation Co, Ankara [Turkish].
16. United States Geological Surveys [Internet]. Wisconsin [cited May 11 2016]. Hydroelectric power: How it works. Available from: 〈 https://water.usgs.gov/edu/hyhowworks.html〉.
17. Labib, A.W., World-class maintenance using a computerized maintenance management system. J Qual Maint Eng 4:1 (1998), 66–75.
18. Khalil, J., Saad, S.M., Gindy, N., MacKechnie, K., A maintenance policy selection tool for industrial machine parts. Int Fed Inf Process Emerg Sol Future Manuf 159 (2005), 431–440.
19. Burhanuddin MA, Ahmad AR, Desa MI. An application of decision making grid to improve maintenance strategies in small and medium industries. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international industrial electronics and application conference. Harbin; 2007. p. 455–60.
20. Tahir Z, Burhanuddin MA, Ahmad AR, Halawani SM, Arif F. Improvement of decision making grid model for maintenance management in small and medium industries. In: Proceedings of the industrial and information systems international conference. Sri Lanka; 2009. p. 598–603.
21. Gupta, S., Maiti, J., Kumar, R., Kumar, U., A control chart guided maintenance policy selection. Int J Min Reclam Environ 23:3 (2009), 216–226.
22. Martorell, S., Sanchez, A., Serradell, V., Age-dependent reliability model considering effects of maintenance and working conditions. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 64:1 (1999), 19–31.
23. Nourelfath, M., Ait-Kadi, D., Optimization of series–parallel multi-state systems under maintenance policies. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 92:12 (2007), 1620–1626.
24. Lofsten, H., Management of industrial maintenance-economic evaluation of maintenance policies. Int J Opera Prod Manag 19:7 (1999), 716–737.
25. Goel, H.D., Grievink, J., Weijnen, M.P.C., Integrated optimal reliable design, production and maintenance planning for multipurpose process plants. Comput Chem Eng 27:11 (2003), 1543–1555.
26. Hilber, P., Miranda, V., Matos, M.A., Bertling, L., Multiobjective optimization applied to maintenance policy for electrical networks. IEEE Trans Pow Syst 22:4 (2007), 1675–1682.
27. Lu, K.Y., Sy, C.C., A real-time decision-making of maintenance using fuzzy agent. Expert Syst Appl 36:2 (2009), 2691–2698.
28. Heo JH, Park GP, Yoon YT, Park JK, Lee SS. Optimal maintenance strategies for transmission systems using the genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the transmission and distribution conference. New Orleans; 2010. p. 1–6.
29. Azadeh, A., Sheikhalishahi, M., Firoozi, M., Khalili, S.M., An integrated multi-criteria Taguchi computer simulation-DEA approach for optimum maintenance policy and planning by incorporating learning effects. Int J Prod Res 51:18 (2013), 5374–5385.
30. Waeyenbergh, G., Pintelon, L., A framework for maintenance concept development. Int J Prod Econ 77:3 (2002), 299–313.
31. Waeyenbergh, G., Pintelon, L., Maintenance concept development: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 89:3 (2004), 398–405.
32. Waeyenbergh, G., Pintelon, L., CIBOCOF: a framework for industrial maintenance concept development. Int J Prod Econ 121:2 (2009), 633–640.
33. Carazsa, F.G., Souza, G.F.M., Risk-based decision making method for maintenance policy selection of thermal power plant equipment. Energy 35 (2000), 964–975.
34. Ding, S.H., Goh, T.T., Tan, P.S., Wee, S.C., Kamaruddin, S., Implementation of decision tree for maintenance policy decision making—a case study in semiconductor industry. Adv Mater Res 591–593 (2012), 704–707.
35. Qingfeng, W., Wenbin, L., Xin, Z., Jianfeng, Y., Qingbin, Y., Development and application of equipment maintenance and safety integrity management system. J Loss Prev Process Ind 24:4 (2011), 321–332.
36. Rosqvist, T., Laakso, K., Reunnanen, M., Value-driven maintenance planning for a production plant. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:1 (2009), 97–110.
37. Leon Hijes, F.C.G., Cartagena, J.J.R., Maintenance strategy based on a multicriterion classification of equipments. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:4 (2006), 444–451.
38. Bevilacqua, M., Braglia, M., Gabbrielli, R., Monte Carlo simulation approach for a modified FMECA in a power plant. Qual Reliab Eng Int 16 (2000), 313–324.
39. Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., Montanari, R., Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20:4 (2003), 503–524.
40. Sharma, R.K., Sharma, P., System failure behavior and maintenance decision making using RCA, FMEA and FM. J Qual Maint Eng 16:1 (2010), 64–88.
41. Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., Montanari, R., Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20:4 (2003), 503–524.
42. Dong YL, Gu YJ, Dong XF. Selection of optimum maintenance strategy for power plant equipment based on evidential reasoning and FMEA. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international industrial engineering and engineering management conference. Singapore; 2008. p. 862–6.
43. Vinodh, S., Varadharajan, A.R., Application of fuzzy VIKOR for concept selection in agile environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42 (2012), 1025–1033.
44. Bevilacqua, B., Braglia, M., The analytic process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 70:1 (2000), 71–83.
45. Dey, P.K., Decision support system for inspection and maintenance: a case study of oil pipelines. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 51:1 (2004), 47–56.
46. Ratnayake, R.M.C., Markeset, T., Technical integrity management: measuring HSE awareness using AHP in selecting a maintenance strategy. J Qual Maint Eng 16:1 (2010), 44–63.
47. Tan, Z., Li, J., Wu, Z., Zheng, J., He, W., An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection. Saf Sci 49:6 (2011), 852–860.
48. Shyjith, K., Ilangkumaran, M., Kumanan, S., Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. J Qual Maint Eng 14:4 (2008), 375–386.
49. Ding, S.H., Kamaruddin, S., Azid, I.A., Development of a model for optimal maintenance policy selection. Eur J Indust Eng 8:1 (2014), 50–68.
50. Ding, S.H., Kamaruddin, S., Azid, I.A., Maintenance policy selection model—a case study in the palm oil industry. J Manuf Technol Manag 25:3 (2014), 415–435.
51. Momeni, M., Fathi, M.R., Zarchi, M.K., Azizollahi, S., A fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach to maintenance strategy selection: a case study. Middle East J Sci Res 8:3 (2011), 699–706.
52. Cheng, Y.H., Tsao, H.L., Rolling stock maintenance strategy selection, spares parts’ estimation and replacement interval calculation. Int J Prod Econ 128:1 (2010), 404–412.
53. Aghaie, M., Fazli, S., An improved MCDM method for maintenance approach selection: a case study of auto industry. Manag Sci Lett 2:1 (2012), 137–146.
54. Zaim, S., Türkyılmaz, A., Acar, M.F., Al-Turki, U., Demirel, O.F., Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study. J Qual Maint Eng 18:1 (2012), 16–29.
55. Gonçalves, C.D.F., Dias, J.A.M., Machado, V.A.C., Multi-criteria decision methodology for selecting maintenance key performance indicators. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 10:3 (2015), 215–223.
56. Ahmadi, A., Gupta, S., Karim, R., Kumar, U., Selection of maintenance strategy for aircraft systems using multi-criteria decision making methodologies. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 17:3 (2010), 223–243.
57. Zeng, W., Jiang, F., Zeng, Q.S., Ye, Y., Fan, R., Decision-making method for electrical equipment condition-based maintenance. Int J Emerg Electr Power Syst 16:4 (2015), 349–355.
58. Labib, A.W., A decision analysis model for maintenance policy selection using a CMMS. J Qual Maint Eng 10:3 (2004), 191–202.
59. Wang, L., Chu, J., Wu, J., Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 107:1 (2007), 151–163.
60. Nezami, F.G., Yıldırım, M.B., A sustainability approach for selecting maintenance strategy. Int J Sustain Eng 6:4 (2013), 332–343.
61. Ilangkumaran, M., Kumanan, S., Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach. J Manuf Technol Manag 20:7 (2009), 1009–1022.
62. Kumar, G., Maiti, J., Modeling risk based maintenance using fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Syst Appl 39:11 (2012), 9946–9954.
63. Bertolini, M., Bevilacqua, M., A combined goal programming-AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:7 (2006), 839–848.
64. Arunraj, N.S., Maiti, J., Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. Saf Sci 48:2 (2010), 238–247.
65. Ghosh, D., Roy, S., A decision-making framework for process plant maintenance. Eur J Ind Eng 4:1 (2010), 78–98.
66. Özcan EC, Küçükyarar U. Assessment of potential southern gas corridor projects with a combined methodology. In: Proceedings of the 23rd world energy congress. İstanbul; 2016. p. 105–21.
67. Saaty, T., The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
68. Saaty, T., Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. Eur J Opera Res 168 (2006), 557–570.
69. Daengdej, J., Lukose, D., Murison, R., Using statistical models and case-based reasoning in claims prediction: experience from a real-world problem. Knowl Based Syst 12:5–6 (1999), 239–245.
70. Ignizio, J.P., Goal programming and extensions. 1976, Lexington Books, Lexington.
71. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. 1981, Springer-Verlag, New York.
72. Roy B. Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). La Revue d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle (RIRO). 8; 1968. p. 57–75.
73. Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B., Vincke, P.H., PROMETHEE – a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. Opera Res 84 (1984), 477–490.
74. Saaty, T., Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1:1 (2008), 83–98.
75. Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T., An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Opera Res 10:2 (2013), 56–66.
76. Qin, X., Huang, G., Chakma, A., Nie, X., Lin, Q., A MCDM-based expert system for climate-change impact assessment and adaptation planning – a case study for the Georgia Basin, Canada. Expert Syst Appl 34:3 (2008), 2164–2179.
77. Ic, Y., An experimental design approach using TOPSIS method for the selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28:2 (2012), 245–256.
78. Chang, C.T., Multi-choice goal programming model for the optimal location of renewable energy facilities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41 (2015), 379–389.
79. Özder, E., Eren, T., Supplier selection with MCDM and goal programming methods. Selçuk Univ J Eng Sci Technol 4:3 (2016), 196–207.
80. Özcan, E.C., Varlı, E., Eren, T., Goal programming approach for shift scheduling problems in hydroelectric power plants. Int J Inf Technol, 2017.
81. Aalaei, A., Davoudpou, H., Revised multi-choice goal programming for incorporated dynamic virtual cellular manufacturing into supply chain management: a case study. Eng Appl Artif Intell 47 (2016), 3–15.
82. Trivedi, A., Singh, A., A hybrid multi-objective decision model for emergency shelter location-relocation projects using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and goal programming approach. Int J Proj Manag 35:5 (2017), 827–840.
83. Özder, E., Eren, T., Çetin Özel, S., Supplier selection with TOPSIS and goal programming methods: a case study. J Trends Dev Mach Assoc Technol 19:1 (2015), 109–112.
84. Yılmaz, B., Dağdeviren, M., A combined approach for equipment selection: F-PROMETHEE method and zero–one goal programming. Expert Syst Appl 38:9 (2011), 11641–11650.
85. Gür, Ş., Hamurcu, M., Eren, T., Using analytic network process and goal programming methods for project selection in the public institution. Les Cahiers du MECAS 13 (2016), 36–51.
86. Ertuğrul, I., Karakaşoğlu, N., Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 36:1 (2009), 702–715.
87. Charnes, A., Coopper, W.W., Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. 1961, Wiley, New York.
88. Badri, M.A., A combined AHP-GP model for quality control system. Int J Prod Econ 72 (2001), 27–40.
89. Utne, I.B., Maintenance strategies for deep-sea offshore wind turbine. J Qual Maint Eng 16:4 (2010), 367–381.