Receptivity to tobacco advertising and susceptibility to tobacco products

Pediatrics

Volumn 139, Issue 6, 2017, Pages

  Pierce, John P ^a,b   Sargent, James D ^c   White, Martha M ^a   Borek, Nicolette ^d   Portnoy, David B ^d   Green, Victoria R ^e,f   Kaufman, Annette R ^g   Stanton, Cassandra A ^h,i   Bansal Travers, Maansi ^j   Strong, David R ^a,b   Pearson, Jennifer L ^k,l   Coleman, Blair N ^d   Leas, Eric ^a,b   Noble, Madison L ^a,b   Trinidad, Dennis R ^a,b   Moran, Meghan B ^l   Carusi, Charles ^h   Hyland, Andrew ^l   Messer, Karen ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS   (United States)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE   (United States)

^f Kelly Government Solutions   (United States)

^g Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program   (United States)

^h WESTAT   (United States)

ⁱ GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^k JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^l American Legacy Foundation   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADVERTISING; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD; SMOKELESS TOBACCO; SMOKING; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TELEVISION; UNITED STATES; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; TOBACCO;

ADOLESCENT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; CHILD; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SMOKING; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85020196608     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-3353     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. National Cancer Institute. The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19. NIH Publication No. 07-6242. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2008
2. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of Smoking and Health; 2012
3. Grana R, Benowitz N, Glantz SA. E-cigarettes: a scientific review. Circulation. 2014;129(19):1972-1986
4. Sebastian M. E-cig marketing budgets growing by more than 100% year over year. Advertising Age. Available at: http://adage.com/article/media/e-cigcompanies-spent-60-million-ads-year/292641/. Accessed August 18, 2015
5. Duke JC, Lee YO, Kim AE, et al. Exposure to electronic cigarette television advertisements among youth and young adults. Pediatrics. 2014;134(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/134/1/e29
6. Singh T, Arrazola RA, Corey CG, et al. Tobacco use among middle and high school students: United States, 2011-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(14):361-367
7. Farrelly MC, Duke JC, Crankshaw EC, et al. A randomized trial of the effect of e-cigarette TV advertisements on intentions to use e-cigarettes. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(5):686-693
8. Healy M. An "explosion" of youth exposure to e-cigarette TV ads. USA Today. Available at: www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/02/e-cigarettes-tv-ads-youth/9760425/. Accessed June 2, 2014
9. Barnett TE, Soule EK, Forrest JR, Porter L, Tomar SL. Adolescent electronic cigarette use: associations with conventional cigarette and hookah smoking. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(2):199-206
10. Wills TA, Knight R, Williams RJ, Pagano I, Sargent JD. Risk factors for exclusive e-cigarette use and dual e-cigarette use and tobacco use in adolescents. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/135/1/e43
11. McGuire WJ. Personality and attitdue change: an information-processing theory. In: Greenwald AG, Brock TC, Ostrom TM, eds. Psychological Foundations of Attitudes. New York, NY: Academic; 1968:171-196
12. McGuire WJ. Attitudes and attitude change. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E, eds. Handbook of Social Pyschology. Vol 2, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Random House; 1985:233-346
13. Ray ML. Marketing Communication and the Hierarchy-of-Effects. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute; 1973
14. Evans N, Farkas A, Gilpin E, Berry C, Pierce JP. Influence of tobacco marketing and exposure to smokers on adolescent susceptibility to smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(20):1538-1545
15. Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Emery SL, et al. Tobacco Control in California: Who's Winning the War? An Evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1996. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego; 1998
16. Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Berry CC. Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking. JAMA. 1998;279(7):511-515
17. Gilpin EA, White MM, Messer K, Pierce JP. Receptivity to tobacco advertising and promotions among young adolescents as a predictor of established smoking in young adulthood. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(8):1489-1495
18. Tanski SE, McClure AC, Li Z, et al. Cued recall of alcohol advertising on television and underage drinking behavior. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(3):264-271
19. Strong DR, Messer K, Hartman SJ, et al. Pre-adolescent receptivity to tobacco marketing and its relationship to acquiring friends who smoke and cigarette smoking initiation [published online ahead of print March 2, 2017]. Ann Behav Med. 10.1007/s12160-017-9896-y
20. Morgenstern M, Isensee B, Hanewinkel R. Seeing and liking cigarette advertisements: is there a "mere exposure" effect? Eur Addict Res. 2013;19(1):42-46
21. Morgenstern M, Isensee B, Sargent JD, Hanewinkel R. Attitudes as mediators of the longitudinal association between alcohol advertising and youth drinking. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(7):610-616
22. Aitken PP, Leathar DS, O'Hagan FJ, Squair SI. Children's awareness of cigarette advertisements and brand imagery. Br J Addict. 1987;82(6):615-622
23. Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Merritt RK. Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol. 1996;15(5):355-361
24. Nodora J, Hartman SJ, Strong DR, et al. Curiosity predicts smoking experimentation independent of susceptibility in a US national sample. Addict Behav. 2014;39(12):1695-1700
25. Strong DR, Hartman SJ, Nodora J, et al. Predictive validity of the expanded susceptibility to smoke index. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(7):862-869
26. Barrington-Trimis JL, Berhane K, Unger JB, et al. Psychosocial factors associated with adolescent electronic cigarette and cigarette use. Pediatrics. 2015;136(2):308-317
27. Fielder RL, Carey KB, Carey MP. Hookah, cigarette, and marijuana use: a prospective study of smoking behaviors among firstyear college women. Addict Behav. 2013;38(11):2729-2735
28. Minaker LM, Shuh A, Nguyen N, Azagba S, Manske SR. Cigarette smoking susceptibility among youth alternate tobacco product users: implications of flavoured tobacco from a national cross-sectional Canadian sample (YSS 2012/2013). BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009549
29. King SM, Iacono WG, McGue M. Childhood externalizing and internalizing psychopathology in the prediction of early substance use. Addiction. 2004;99(12):1548-1559
30. Colder CR, Scalco M, Trucco EM, et al. Prospective associations of internalizing and externalizing problems and their co-occurrence with early adolescent substance use. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013;41(4):667-677
31. Leeman RF, Hoff RA, Krishnan-Sarin S, Patock-Peckham JA, Potenza MN. Impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and part-time job status in relation to substance use and gambling in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(4):460-466
32. Hyland A, Ambrose BK, Conway KP, et al. Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study [published online ahead of print August 8, 2016]. Tob Control. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052934
33. United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, and Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study [United States] Restricted-Use Files. ICPSR36231. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Available at: http://www.icpsr. umich.edu/icpsrweb/NAHDAP/studies/36231. Accessed May 24, 2016
34. United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, and Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study 2013-2016 [United States] Restricted-Use Files User Guide. ICPSR36231-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Available at: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/cgi-bin/file?comp=none&study=36231&ds=0&file-id=1232695& path=NAHDAP2016. Accessed May 24, 2016
35. McDonell MG, Comtois KA, Voss WD, Morgan AH, Ries RK. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Short Screener (GSS): psychometric properties and performance as a screening measure in adolescents. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009;35(3):157-160
36. Hoyle RH, Stephenson MT, Palmgreen P, Lorch EP, Donohew RL. Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Pers Individ Dif. 2002;32(3):401-414
37. SAS 9.3 System Options: Reference [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc; 2011. Available at: http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/stat/index.html#stat93
38. SAS Institute, Inc. Balanced Repeated Replication (BRR) method. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc; 2010. Available at: https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63962/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug-surveymeans-a0000000237.htm
39. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2012. Washington, DC: Bureau for Consumer Protection; 2015
40. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Smokeless Tobacco Report for 2011. Washington, DC: Bureau for Consumer Protection; 2013
41. Naik PA, Raman K. Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J Mark Res. 2003;40(4):375-388
42. Lynch J. Why TV is still the most effective advertising medium: key findings from MarketShare study. Adweek. Available at: www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/why-tv-still-most-effective-advertisingmedium-165247. Accessed August 18, 2015
43. Trinidad DRPJ, Sargent JD, White MM, et al. Susceptibility to Tobacco Product Use Among Youth in Wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH). Sacramento, CA: Study Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco; 2016