-
1
-
-
77649204665
-
The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings
-
Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, et al. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ 2010;340: c186.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
, pp. c186
-
-
Dawson, J.1
Doll, H.2
Fitzpatrick, R.3
-
2
-
-
84870062280
-
The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy
-
Ahmed S, Berzon RA, Revicki DA, et al. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Med Care 2012;50:1060-70.
-
(2012)
Med Care
, vol.50
, pp. 1060-1070
-
-
Ahmed, S.1
Berzon, R.A.2
Revicki, D.A.3
-
4
-
-
71349086383
-
Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care
-
Ouwens M, Hermens R, Hulscher M, et al. Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care. Support Care Cancer 2010;18:121-30.
-
(2010)
Support Care Cancer
, vol.18
, pp. 121-130
-
-
Ouwens, M.1
Hermens, R.2
Hulscher, M.3
-
6
-
-
0035954119
-
Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting
-
Higginson IJ, Carr AJ. Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ 2001;322:1297-300.
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.322
, pp. 1297-1300
-
-
Higginson, I.J.1
Carr, A.J.2
-
7
-
-
0010524401
-
-
National Institute for health and care excellence. Technology appraisal guidance TA34 Published date: 15 March
-
NICE. Guidance on the use of trastuzumab for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. National Institute for health and care excellence. Technology appraisal guidance [TA34] Published date: 15 March 2002. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta34
-
(2002)
Guidance on the use of trastuzumab for the treatment of advanced breast cancer
-
-
-
9
-
-
0037950627
-
Cancer patients' preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: a qualitative study
-
Brundage M, Leis A, Bezjak A, et al. Cancer patients' preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: a qualitative study. Qual Life Res 2003;12:395-404.
-
(2003)
Qual Life Res
, vol.12
, pp. 395-404
-
-
Brundage, M.1
Leis, A.2
Bezjak, A.3
-
10
-
-
0037265996
-
Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer
-
Davidson BJ, Goldenberg SL, Gleave ME, et al. Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2003;30:107-14.
-
(2003)
Oncol Nurs Forum
, vol.30
, pp. 107-114
-
-
Davidson, B.J.1
Goldenberg, S.L.2
Gleave, M.E.3
-
11
-
-
77950963307
-
Added value of health-related quality of life measurement in cancer clinical trials: the experience of the NCIC CTG
-
Au HJ, Ringash J, Brundage M, et al. Added value of health-related quality of life measurement in cancer clinical trials: the experience of the NCIC CTG. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2010;10:119-28.
-
(2010)
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res
, vol.10
, pp. 119-128
-
-
Au, H.J.1
Ringash, J.2
Brundage, M.3
-
12
-
-
84880909003
-
Toward patient-centered drug development in oncology
-
Basch E. Toward patient-centered drug development in oncology. N Engl J Med 2013;369:397-400.
-
(2013)
N Engl J Med
, vol.369
, pp. 397-400
-
-
Basch, E.1
-
13
-
-
33746024287
-
Health-related quality of life measurement in randomized clinical trials in surgical oncology
-
Blazeby JM, Avery K, Sprangers M, et al. Health-related quality of life measurement in randomized clinical trials in surgical oncology. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3178-86.
-
(2006)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.24
, pp. 3178-3186
-
-
Blazeby, J.M.1
Avery, K.2
Sprangers, M.3
-
14
-
-
84891371156
-
Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02): an open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial
-
Ford HE, Marshall A, Bridgewater JA, et al. Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02): an open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:78-86.
-
(2014)
Lancet Oncol
, vol.15
, pp. 78-86
-
-
Ford, H.E.1
Marshall, A.2
Bridgewater, J.A.3
-
15
-
-
84903547873
-
Gefitinib for oesophageal cancer progressing after chemotherapy (COG): a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial
-
Dutton SJ, Ferry DR, Blazeby JM, et al. Gefitinib for oesophageal cancer progressing after chemotherapy (COG): a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:894-904.
-
(2014)
Lancet Oncol
, vol.15
, pp. 894-904
-
-
Dutton, S.J.1
Ferry, D.R.2
Blazeby, J.M.3
-
16
-
-
84938930250
-
Putting patient-reported outcomes on the 'Big Data Road Map'
-
Calvert M, Thwaites R, Kyte D, et al. Putting patient-reported outcomes on the 'Big Data Road Map'. J R Soc Med 2015;108:299-303.
-
(2015)
J R Soc Med
, vol.108
, pp. 299-303
-
-
Calvert, M.1
Thwaites, R.2
Kyte, D.3
-
17
-
-
84872080748
-
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
-
Chan A, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586.
-
(2013)
BMJ
, vol.346
-
-
Chan, A.1
Tetzlaff, J.M.2
Gøtzsche, P.C.3
-
18
-
-
79960259603
-
Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers
-
Brundage M, Bass B, Davidson J, et al. Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers. Qual Life Res 2011;20:653-64.
-
(2011)
Qual Life Res
, vol.20
, pp. 653-664
-
-
Brundage, M.1
Bass, B.2
Davidson, J.3
-
19
-
-
84908139094
-
Systematic evaluation of the patient-reported outcome (PRO) content of clinical trial protocols
-
Kyte D, Duffy H, Fletcher B, et al. Systematic evaluation of the patient-reported outcome (PRO) content of clinical trial protocols. PLoS One 2014;9:e110229.
-
(2014)
PLoS One
, vol.9
-
-
Kyte, D.1
Duffy, H.2
Fletcher, B.3
-
20
-
-
84885032561
-
Inconsistencies in quality of life data collection in clinical trials: a potential source of bias? Interviews with research nurses and trialists
-
Kyte D, Ives J, Draper H, et al. Inconsistencies in quality of life data collection in clinical trials: a potential source of bias? Interviews with research nurses and trialists. PLoS One 2013;8:e76625.
-
(2013)
PLoS One
, vol.8
-
-
Kyte, D.1
Ives, J.2
Draper, H.3
-
21
-
-
84941624004
-
Planning and reporting of quality-of-life outcomes in cancer trials
-
Schandelmaier S, Conen K, von Elm E, et al. Planning and reporting of quality-of-life outcomes in cancer trials. Ann Oncol 2015;26:1966-73.
-
(2015)
Ann Oncol
, vol.26
, pp. 1966-1973
-
-
Schandelmaier, S.1
Conen, K.2
von Elm, E.3
-
22
-
-
84940954510
-
PROMOTION Registry. Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting across cancer randomized controlled trials according to the CONSORT PRO extension: a pooled analysis of 557 Trials
-
Efficace F, Fayers P, Pusic A, et al. On behalf of EORTC Quality of Life Group. PROMOTION Registry. Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting across cancer randomized controlled trials according to the CONSORT PRO extension: a pooled analysis of 557 Trials. Cancer 2015;121:3335-42.
-
(2015)
Cancer
, vol.121
, pp. 3335-3342
-
-
Efficace, F.1
Fayers, P.2
Pusic, A.3
-
23
-
-
84892142354
-
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set
-
Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 2014;383:156-65.
-
(2014)
Lancet
, vol.383
, pp. 156-165
-
-
Chalmers, I.1
Bracken, M.B.2
Djulbegovic, B.3
-
24
-
-
84928498620
-
Predictive value of urine interleukin-18 in the evolution and outcome of acute kidney injury in critically ill adult patients
-
Nisula S, Yang R, Poukkanen M, et al. Predictive value of urine interleukin-18 in the evolution and outcome of acute kidney injury in critically ill adult patients. Br J Anaesth 2015;114:460-8.
-
(2015)
Br J Anaesth
, vol.114
, pp. 460-468
-
-
Nisula, S.1
Yang, R.2
Poukkanen, M.3
-
26
-
-
84872075614
-
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials
-
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200-7.
-
(2013)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.158
, pp. 200-207
-
-
Chan, A.W.1
Tetzlaff, J.M.2
Altman, D.G.3
-
27
-
-
84874371892
-
Reporting of patient reported outcomes in randomised trials: the CONSORT PRO extension
-
Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of patient reported outcomes in randomised trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA 2013;309:814-22.
-
(2013)
JAMA
, vol.309
, pp. 814-822
-
-
Calvert, M.1
Blazeby, J.2
Altman, D.G.3
-
28
-
-
77950679021
-
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
-
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000251.
-
(2010)
PLoS Med
, vol.7
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Altman, D.G.2
Moher, D.3
-
29
-
-
78751697239
-
Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists
-
Smyth RM, Kirkham JJ, Jacoby A, et al. Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists. BMJ 2011;342:c7153..
-
(2011)
BMJ
, vol.342
, pp. c7153
-
-
Smyth, R.M.1
Kirkham, J.J.2
Jacoby, A.3
-
30
-
-
84885176452
-
Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards
-
Brundage M, Blazeby J, Revicki D, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1161-75.
-
(2013)
Qual Life Res
, vol.22
, pp. 1161-1175
-
-
Brundage, M.1
Blazeby, J.2
Revicki, D.3
-
31
-
-
2442695245
-
What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models
-
Babyak MA. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med 2004;66:411-21.
-
(2004)
Psychosom Med
, vol.66
, pp. 411-421
-
-
Babyak, M.A.1
|