Urban expansion using remote-sensing data and a monocentric urban model

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 77, Issue , 2019, Pages

  Gao, Zhenyu ^a   Kii, Masanobu ^a   Nonomura, Atsuko ^a   Nakamura, Kazuki ^b  

^a KAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b MEIJO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Monocentric urban model; Remote sensing; Urban development intensity; Urban expansion

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FLOORS; HOUSING; LAND USE; POPULATION STATISTICS; SPACE OPTICS; URBAN GROWTH;

DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; INDISPENSABLE TOOLS; RAPID URBANIZATIONS; REMOTE SENSING DATA; STATISTICAL MEASURES; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN EXPANSION; URBAN MODEL;

REMOTE SENSING;

ECONOMIC GROWTH; MODELING; PLANNING PRACTICE; POPULATION GROWTH; REMOTE SENSING; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

CHINA;

EID: 85020053954     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Acheampong, R.A., Silva, E., Land use-transport interaction modelling: A review of the literature and future research directions. Journal of Transport and Land Use 8:3 (2015), 11–38.
2. Alonso, W., Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. 1964, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Anas, A., A unified theory of consumption, travel and trip chaining. Journal of Urban Economics 62:2 (2007), 162–186.
4. Arribas-Bel, D., Sanz-Gracia, F., The validity of the monocentric city model in a polycentric age: US metropolitan areas in 1990, 2000 and 2010. Urban Geography 35:7 (2014), 980–997.
5. Asadoorian, M.O., Simulating the spatial distribution of population and emissions to 2100. Environmental and Resource Economics 39:3 (2008), 199–221.
6. Bagan, H., Yamagata, Y., Landsat analysis of urban growth: How Tokyo became the world's largest megacity during the last 40 years. Remote Sensing of Environment 127:Dec (2012), 210–222.
7. Baum-Snow, N., Suburbanization and transportation in the monocentric model. Journal of Urban Economics 62:3 (2007), 405–423.
8. Beijing Statistical Information Net, Beijing statistical yearbook. http://www.bjstats.gov.cn, 2016 (Accessed: 16.10.25).
9. China National Tourism Administration, Report on the development of national tourism and leisure. http://www.cnta.gov.cn, 2016 (Accessed: 16.10.25).
10. Deng, X., Huang, J., Rozelle, S., Uchida, E., Growth, population and industrialization, and urban land expansion of China. Journal of Urban Economics 63:1 (2008), 96–115.
11. DeSalvo, J., Su, Q., Determinants of urban sprawl: A panel data approach. (Retrieved from) http://economics.usf.edu/PDF/Desalvo_3.pdf, 2013.
12. Duranton, G., Puga, D., The growth of cities. CEPR discussion paper no. 9590. (Retrieved from) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2309234, 2013.
13. Duranton, G., Puga, D., Urban land use. CEPR discussion paper no. 10282. (Retrieved from) http://real.wharton.upenn.edu/~duranton/Duranton_Papers/Handbook/Urban_land_use.pdf, 2014.
14. Fujita, M., Urban economic theory: Land use and city size. 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Gaffin, S.R., Rosenzweig, C., Xing, X., Yetman, G., Downscaling and geo-spatial gridding of socio-economic projections from the IPCC special report on emissions scenarios (SRES). Global Environmental Change 14:2 (2004), 105–123.
16. Grübler, A., O'Neill, B., Riahi, K., Chirkov, V., Goujon, A., Kolp, P., Slentoe, E., Regional, national, and spatially explicit scenarios of demographic and economic change based on SRES. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74:7 (2007), 980–1029.
17. GTAP, Working Paper No. 42. An integrated global land use data base for CGE analysis of climate policy options. 2008, 29–31 (Retrieved from) https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=2603.
18. Gubins, S., Verhoef, E.T., Dynamic bottleneck congestion and residential land use in the monocentric city. Journal of Urban Economics 80:Mar (2014), 51–61.
19. Haikou Municipal Government, China, Haikou statistical yearbook. http://www.haikou.gov.cn/rshk/hknj/, 2016 (Accessed: 16.10.25).
20. Homer, C., Huang, C., Yang, L., Wylie, B., Coan, M., Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 70:7 (2004), 829–840.
21. Hunt, J.D., Kriger, D.S., Miller, E.J., Current operational urban land-use-transport modelling frameworks: A review. Transport Reviews 25:3 (2005), 329–376.
22. Iacono, M., Levinson, D., El-Geneidy, A., Models of transportation and land use change: A guide to the territory. Journal of Planning Literature 22:4 (2008), 323–340.
23. Imhoff, M.L., Zhang, P., Wolfe, R.E., Bounoua, L., Remote sensing of the urban heat island effect across biomes in the continental USA. Remote Sensing of Environment 114:3 (2010), 504–513.
24. Jiao, L., Urban land density function: A new method to characterize urban expansion. Landscape and Urban Planning 139:Jul (2015), 26–39.
25. Kii, M., Nakanishi, H., Nakamura, K., Doi, K., Transportation and spatial development: An overview and a future direction. Transport Policy 49:Jul (2016), 148–158.
26. Legislative Affairs Office of the State Council P. R. China, Rules of the State Council on Working Hours of Workers and Staff Members. http://fgk.chinalaw.gov.cn/article/xzfg/199503/19950300268667.shtml, 1995 (Accessed: 16.10.25).
27. Lu, D., Weng, Q., Use of impervious surface in urban land-use classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 102:1–2 (2006), 146–160.
28. Mills, E.S., Studies in the structure of the urban economy. 1972, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
29. Muth, R.F., Cities and housing: The spatial pattern of urban residential land use. 1969, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
30. Oueslati, W., Alvanides, S., Garrod, G., Determinants of urban sprawl in European cities. Urban Studies 52:9 (2015), 1594–1614.
31. Paulsen, K., Yet even more evidence on the spatial size of cities: Urban spatial expansion in the US, 1980–2000. Regional Science and Urban Economics 42:4 (2012), 561–568.
32. Salvati, L., Carlucci, M., Distance matters: Land consumption and the mono-centric model in two southern European cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 127:Jul (2014), 41–51.
33. Shahtahmassebi, A.R., Song, J., Zheng, Q., Blackburn, G.A., Wang, K., Huang, L.Y., Deng, J.S., Remote sensing of impervious surface growth: A framework for quantifying urban expansion and re-densification mechanisms. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 46:Apr (2016), 94–112.
34. Statistics Bureau of Nanjing, China, Nanjing statistical yearbook. http://221.226.86.104/file/nj2004/njtjnj.htm, 2016 (Accessed: 16.10.25).
35. U.S. Geological Survey, Earth explorer. http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov, 2016 (Accessed: 16.10.25).
36. United Nations, World population prospects: The 2012 revision. 2013, United Nations, New York.
37. Wegener, M., Overview of land-use transport models. Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, 5, 2004, 127–146.
38. World Bank, World development indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator#topic-7, 2013 (Accessed: 16.10.25).
39. Xian, G., Crane, M., Assessments of urban growth in the Tampa Bay watershed using remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment 97:2 (2005), 203–215.
40. Yang, L., Huang, C., Homer, C., Wylie, B., Coan, M., An approach for mapping large-area impervious surfaces: Synergistic use of Landsat 7 ETM + and high spatial resolution imagery. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 29:2 (2002), 230–240.
41. Yuan, F., Bauer, M.E., Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 106:3 (2007), 375–386.
42. Zhou, D., Zhao, S., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Spatiotemporal trends of terrestrial vegetation activity along the urban development intensity gradient in China's 32 major cities. Science of the Total Environment 488:Jun (2014), 136–145.