Assessing drivers of economy-wide energy use and emissions: IDA versus SDA

Energy Policy

Volumn 107, Issue , 2017, Pages 585-599

  Wang, H ^a   Ang, B W ^a   Su, Bin ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Economy wide analysis; Energy consumption; Energy related emissions; Index decomposition analysis; Structural decomposition analysis

Indexed keywords

ENERGY UTILIZATION;

ECONOMY-WIDE ANALYSIS; ENERGY AND CLIMATE POLICIES; ENERGY-RELATED EMISSIONS; INDEX DECOMPOSITION ANALYSES (IDA); INDEX DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; MULTIPLICATIVE DECOMPOSITION; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS (SDA);

ENERGY POLICY;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; EMISSION INVENTORY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; PLANNING METHOD; POLICY ANALYSIS; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION;

EID: 85019572594     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.034     Document Type: Article

References (146)

1. Ang, B.W., Decomposition of industrial energy consumption: the energy intensity approach. Energy Econ. 16 (1994), 163–174.
2. Ang, B.W., Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method?. Energy Policy 32 (2004), 1131–1139.
3. Ang, B.W., Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: From energy–GDP ratio to composite efficiency index. Energy Policy 34 (2006), 574–582.
4. Ang, B.W., LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy 86 (2015), 233–238.
5. Ang, B.W., Choi, K.-H., Decomposition of aggregate energy and gas emission intensities for industry: a refined divisia index method. Energy J. 18:3 (1997), 59–73.
6. Ang, B.W., Goh, T., Carbon intensity of electricity in ASEAN: drivers, performance and outlook. Energy Policy 98 (2016), 170–179.
7. Ang, B.W., Huang, H.C., Mu, A.R., Properties and linkages of some index decomposition analysis methods. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 4624–4632.
8. Ang, B.W., Lee, S.Y., Decomposition of industrial energy consumption: some methodological and application issues. Energy Econ. 16 (1994), 83–92.
9. Ang, B.W., Liu, F.L., A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation. Energy 26 (2001), 537–548.
10. Ang, B.W., Liu, F.L., Chew, E.P., Perfect decomposition techniques in energy and environmental analysis. Energy Policy 31 (2003), 1561–1566.
11. Ang, B.W., Liu, F.L., Chung, H.-S., A generalized Fisher index approach to energy decomposition analysis. Energy Econ. 26 (2004), 757–763.
12. Ang, B.W., Liu, N., Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach. Energy Policy 35 (2007), 238–246.
13. Ang, B.W., Liu, N., Negative-value problems of the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach. Energy Policy 35 (2007), 739–742.
14. Ang, B.W., Mu, A.R., Zhou, P., Accounting frameworks for tracking energy efficiency trends. Energy Econ. 32 (2010), 1209–1219.
15. Ang, B.W., Su, B., Carbon emission intensity in electricity production: a global analysis. Energy Policy 94 (2016), 56–63.
16. Ang, B.W., Su, B., Wang, H., A spatial-temporal decomposition approch to performance assessment in energy and emissions. Energy Econ. 60 (2016), 112–121.
17. Ang, B.W., Wang, H., Index decomposition analysis with multidimensional and multilevel energy data. Energy Econ. 51 (2015), 67–76.
18. Ang, B.W., Xu, X.Y., Tracking industrial energy efficiency trends using index decomposition analysis. Energy Econ. 40 (2013), 1014–1021.
19. Ang, B.W., Xu, X.Y., Su, B., Multi-country comparisons of energy performance: the index decomposition analysis approach. Energy Econ. 47 (2015), 68–76.
20. Arto, I., Rueda-Cantuche, J.M., Peters, G.P., Comparing the GTAP-MRIO and WIOD databases for carbon footprint analysis. Econ. Syst. Res. 26:3 (2014), 327–353.
21. Baiocchi, G., Minx, J.C., Understanding changes in the UK's CO2 emissions: a global perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:4 (2010), 1177–1184.
22. Balk, B.M., Ideal indices and indicators for two or more factors. J. Econ. Social. Meas. 28 (2003), 203–217.
23. Balk, B.M., Searching for the holy grail of index number theory. J. Econ. Social. Meas. 33:1 (2008), 19–25.
24. Bartoletto, S., Varas, Md.M.R., Energy transition and CO2 emissions in Southern Europe: Italy and Spain (1861–2000). Glob. Environ. 2 (2008), 47–81.
25. Bashmakov, I., Myshak, A., Russian energy efficiency accounting system. Energy Effic. 7 (2014), 743–759.
26. Belzer, D.B., 2014. A Comprehensive System of Energy Intensity Indicators for the U.S.: Methods, Data and Key Trends. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
27. Boyd, G., McDonald, J.F., Ross, M., Hanson, D.A., Separating the changing composition of US manufacturing production from energy efficiency improvements: a Divisia index approach. Energy J. 8:2 (1987), 77–96.
28. Boyd, G.A., Hanson, D.A., Sterner, T., Decomposition of changes in energy intensity—a comparison of the Divisia index and other methods. Energy Econ. 10 (1988), 309–312.
29. Cellura, M., Longo, S., Mistretta, M., Application of the Structural Decomposition Analysis to assess the indirect energy consumption and air emission changes related to Italian households consumption. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16:2 (2012), 1135–1145.
30. Chen, C.-Y., Rose, A., A structural decomposition analysis of changes in energy demand in Taiwan: 1971–1984. Energy J. 11:1 (1990), 127–146.
31. Choi, K.-H., Ang, B.W., Attribution of changes in Divisia real energy intensity index — An extension to index decomposition analysis. Energy Econ. 34 (2012), 171–176.
32. Das, A., Paul, S.K., Changes in energy requirements of the residential sector in India between 1993–94 and 2006–07. Energy Policy 53 (2013), 27–40.
33. Das, A., Paul, S.K., CO2 emissions from household consumption in India between 1993–94 and 2006–07: a decomposition analysis. Energy Econ. 41 (2014), 90–105.
34. de Boer, P., Additive structural decomposition analysis and index number theory: an empirical application of the montgomery decomposition. Econ. Syst. Res. 20:1 (2008), 97–109.
35. de Boer, P., Generalized Fisher index or Siegel–Shapley decomposition?. Energy Econ. 31 (2009), 810–814.
36. de Boer, P., Multiplicative decomposition and index number theory: an empirical application of the sato-vartia decomposition. Econ. Syst. Res. 21:2 (2009), 163–174.
37. Dietzenbacher, E., Stage, J., Mixing oil and water? Using hybrid input-output tables in a structural decomposition analysis. Econ. Syst. Res. 18:1 (2006), 85–95.
38. Dietzenbacher, E., Hoen, A.R., Los, B., Labor productivity in Western Europe 1975–1985: an intercountry, interindustry analysis. J. Reg. Sci. 40:3 (2000), 425–452.
39. Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Structural decomposition techniques: sense and sensitivity. Econ. Syst. Res. 10:4 (1998), 307–324.
40. Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., Timmer, M., de Vries, G., The construction of world input–output tables in the wiod project. Econ. Syst. Res. 25:1 (2013), 71–98.
41. Du, H., Guo, J., Mao, G., Smith, A.M., Wang, X., Wang, Y., CO2 emissions embodied in China–US trade: input–output analysis based on the emergy/dollar ratio. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 5980–5987.
42. EEA, Resource-efficient Green Economy and EU Policies. 2014, European Environment Agency, Denmark.
43. EEA, Why did Greenhouse Gas Emissions Decrease in the EU between 1990 and 2012?. 2014, European Environment Agency, Denmark.
44. Elliot, T., Duncan, J., Field, B., 2016. Changes in Energy Use: New Zealand 1990–2011. Energy Information and Modelling Group of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, and Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority, Wellington. 〈http://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/sectors-industries/energy/energy-data-modelling/publications/changes-in-energy-use〉.
45. Environment Canada, 2014. Canada's Emissions Trends. Environment Canada, Minister of the Environment, Canada.
46. Feng, K., Davis, S.J., Sun, L., Hubacek, K., Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013. Nat. Commun., 6, 2015, 7714, 10.1038/ncomms8714.
47. Fernández González, P., Exploring energy efficiency in several European countries: an attribution analysis of the Divisia structural change index. Appl. Energy 137 (2015), 364–374.
48. Fernández González, P., Landajo, M., Presno, M.J., Multilevel LMDI decomposition of changes in aggregate energy consumption. A cross country analysis in the EU-27. Energy Policy 68 (2014), 576–584.
49. Forster, H., Schumacher, K., De Cian, E., HÜBler, M., Keppo, I., Mima, S., Sands, R.D., European energy efficiency and decarbonization strategies beyond 2030—A sectoral multi-model decomposition. Clim. Change Econ., 04(supp01), 2013, 1340004.
50. FSO, Air Emissions Accounts: Decomposition of Switzerland's Fossil CO2 Emissions. 2015, Federal Statistical Office, Switzerland.
51. Fu, F., Liu, H., Polenske, K.R., Li, Z., Measuring the energy consumptioin of China's domestic investment from 1992 to 2007. Appl. Energy 102 (2013), 1267–1274.
52. Gambhir, A., Schulz, N., Napp, T., Tong, D., Munuera, L., Faist, M., Riahi, K., A hybrid modelling approach to develop scenarios for China's carbon dioxide emissions to 2050. Energy Policy 59 (2013), 614–632.
53. Geng, Y., Zhao, H., Liu, Z., Xue, B., Fujita, T., Xi, F., Exploring driving factors of energy-related CO2 emissions in Chinese provinces: a case of Liaoning. Energy Policy 60 (2013), 820–826.
54. Ghosh, A., Input-output approch in an allocation system. Economica 25:97 (1958), 58–64.
55. Gingrich, S., Kušková, P., Steinberger, J.K., Long-term changes in CO2 emissions in Austria and Czechoslovakia—Identifying the drivers of environmental pressures. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 535–543.
56. Gould, B.W., Kulshreshtha, S.N., An interindustry analysis of structural change and energy use linkages in the Saskatchewan economy. Energy Econ. 8 (1986), 186–196.
57. Gowdy, J.M., Miller, J.L., Technological and demand change in energy use: an input—output analysis. Environ. Plan. A 19:10 (1987), 1387–1398.
58. Guan, D., Hubacek, K., Weber, C.L., Peters, G.P., Reiner, D.M., The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Glob. Environ. Change 18 (2008), 626–634.
59. Hasanbeigi, A., Jiang, Z., Price, L., Retrospective and prospective analysis of the trends of energy use in Chinese iron and steel industry. J. Clean. Prod. 74 (2014), 105–118.
60. Hasanbeigi, A., Price, L., Fino-Chen, C., Lu, H., Ke, J., Retrospective and prospective decomposition analysis of Chinese manufacturing energy use and policy implications. Energy Policy 63 (2013), 562–574.
61. Hasegawa, R., Regional comparisons and decomposition analyses of CO2 emissions in Japan. Environ. Sci. 19:4 (2006), 277–289.
62. Hoekstra, R., Michel, B., Suh, S., The emission cost of international sourcing: using structural decomposition analysis to calculate the contribution of international sourcing to CO2-emission growth. Econ. Syst. Res., 2016, 1–17.
63. Hoekstra, R., van der Bergh, J.J.C.J.M., Comparing structural and index decomposition analysis. Energy Econ. 25 (2003), 39–64.
64. IEA, Worldwide Trends in Energy Use and Efficiency. 2008, International Energy Agency, Pairs.
65. IEA, Energy Efficiency Indicators: essentials for Policy Making. 2014, International Energy Agency, Paris.
66. IEA, World Energy Outlook 2014. 2014, International Energy Agency, Paris.
67. IEA, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. 2015, International Energy Agency, Paris.
68. IEA, Energy Efficiency Market Report 2015: Market Trends and Medium-term Prospects. 2015, International Energy Agency, Pairs.
69. IEA, World Bank, Sustainable Energy for All 2015—Progress Toward Sustainable Energy (June). 2015, World Bank, Washington, DC, 10.1596/978-1-4648-0690-2.
70. IPCC, Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C., (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
71. Jacobsen, H.K., Energy demand, structural change and trade: a decomposition analysis of the Danish manufacturing industry. Econ. Syst. Res. 12:3 (2000), 319–343.
72. Jimenez, R., Mercado, J., Energy intensity: a decomposition and counterfactual exercise for Latin American countries. Energy Econ. 42 (2014), 161–171.
73. Kagawa, S., Inamura, H., A structural decomposition of energy consumption based on a hybrid rectangular input-output framework: Japan's case. Econ. Syst. Res. 13:4 (2001), 339–363.
74. Kaya, Y., Yokoburi, K., Environment, Energy, and Economy: Strategies for Sustainability. 1997, United Nations Univ. Press, Tokyo.
75. Kesicki, F., Costs and potentials of reducing CO2 emissions in the UK domestic stock from a systems perspective. Energy Build. 51 (2012), 203–211.
76. Kesicki, F., Intertemporal issues and marginal abatement costs in the UK transport sector. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 17:5 (2012), 418–426.
77. Kesicki, F., Marginal abatement cost curves: combining energy system modelling and decomposition analysis. Environ. Model. Assess. 18:1 (2012), 27–37.
78. Kotchen, M.J., Mansur, E.T., Correspondence: reassessing the contribution of natural gas to US CO2 emission reductions since 2007. Nat. Commun., 7, 2016.
79. Lenzen, M., Structural analyses of energy use and carbon emissions – an overview. Econ. Syst. Res. 28:2 (2016), 119–132.
80. Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., Geschke, A., Building Eora: a global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Econ. Syst. Res. 25:1 (2013), 20–49.
81. Leontief, W., The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1929. 1941, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, (mors) (Second Ed. 1951, New York, Oxford University Press).
82. Leontief, W., Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 52:3 (1970), 262–271.
83. Li, A., Hu, M., Wang, M., Cao, Y., Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Eastern and Central China: a temporal and a cross-regional decomposition analysis. Technol. Forecast. Social. Change 103 (2016), 284–297.
84. Lim, H.-J., Yoo, S.-H., Kwak, S.-J., Industrial CO2 emissions from energy use in Korea: a structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 686–698.
85. Liu, H., Xi, Y., Guo, Je, Li, X., Energy embodied in the international trade of China: an energy input–output analysis. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 3957–3964.
86. Liu, J., Wang, R., Yang, J., Shi, Y., The relationship between consumption and production system and its implications for sustainable development of China. Ecol. Complex. 7:2 (2010), 212–216.
87. Liu, N., Ma, Z., Kang, J., Changes in carbon intensity in China's industrial sector: decomposition and attribution analysis. Energy Policy 87 (2015), 28–38.
88. Liu, X.Q., Ang, B.W., Ong, H.L., The application of the divisia index to the decomposition of changes in industrial energy consumption. Energy J. 13:4 (1992), 161–177.
89. Liu, Z., Davis, S.J., Feng, K., Hubacek, K., Liang, S., Anadon, L.D., Chen, B., Liu, J., Yan, J., Guan, D., Targeted opportunities to address the climate-trade dilemma in China. Nat. Clim. Change 6:2 (2016), 201–206.
90. Löschel, A., Pothen, F., Schymura, M., Peeling the onion: analyzing aggregate, national and sectoral energy intensity in the European Union. Energy Econ. 52 (2015), S63–S75.
91. Ma, C., A multi-fuel, multi-sector and multi-region approach to index decomposition: an application to China's energy consumption 1995–2010. Energy Econ. 42 (2014), 9–16.
92. Miller, R.E., Blair, P.D., 2009. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions.
93. Minx, J.C., Baiocchi, G., Wiedmann, T., Barrett, J., 2009. Understanding Changes in UK CO2 Emissions 1992–2004: A Structural Decomposition Analysis, Report to the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs by Stockholm Environment Institute at the University of York and the University of Durham, DEFRA, London, UK.
94. Mu, A., Index Decomposition Analysis: Some Methodological Issues, PhD thesis. 2012, National University of Singapore.
95. Mulder, P., de Groot, H.L.F., Structural change and convergence of energy intensity across OECD countries, 1970–2005. Energy Econ. 34 (2012), 1910–1921.
96. Myers, L., Nakamura, L., Saving Energy in Manufacturing. 1978, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
97. Narayanan, B.G., Walmsley, T.L., Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: the GTAP 7 Data Base, Center for Global Trade Analysis. 2008, Purdue University.
98. Nasseri, I., Assané, D., Konan, D.E., While visitors conserve, residents splurge: patterns and changes in energy consumption, 1997–2007. Energy Econ. 49 (2015), 282–292.
99. NBS, China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2007. 2008, China Statistics Press, Beijing.
100. NBS, China Statistical Yearbook 2007. 2008, China Statistics Press, Beijing.
101. NBS, China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2012. 2013, China Statistics Press, Beijing.
102. NBS, China Statistical Yearbook 2012. 2013, China Statistics Press, Beijing.
103. ODYSSEE, 2015. Energy Efficiency Trends and Policies in the EU. Available at 〈http://www.odyssee-mure.eu〉.
104. OEE, 2013. Energy Efficiency Trends in Canada 1990 to 2010. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa.
105. Okushima, S., Tamura, M., Multiple calibration decomposition analysis: energy use and carbon dioxide emissions in the Japanese economy, 1970–1995. Energy Policy 35 (2007), 5156–5170.
106. Owen, A., Steen-Olsen, K., Barrett, J., Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., A structural decomposition approach to comparing MRIO databases. Econ. Syst. Res. 26:3 (2014), 262–283.
107. Parker, S., Liddle, B., Energy efficiency in the manufacturing sector pf the OECD: analysis of prices elasticities. Energy Econ. 58 (2016), 38–45.
108. Pløger, E., 1983. Input-output analysis of the changes in energy consumption in Danish industries, 1966–1979. In: Proceedings of the 4th IIASA Task Forces Meeting on Input-output Modeling.
109. Pløger, E., 1984. The effects of structural changes on Danish energy consumption. In: Proceedings of the 5th IIASA Task Forces Meeting on Input-output Modeling.
110. Pothen, F., Schymura, M., Bigger cakes with fewer ingredients? A comparison of material use of the world economy. Ecol. Econ. 109 (2015), 109–121.
111. Rose, A., Casler, S., Input–output structural decomposition analysis: a critical appraisal. Econ. Syst. Res. 8:1 (1996), 33–62.
112. Rose, A., Chen, C.Y., Sources of change in energy use in the U.S. economy, 1972–1982. Resour. Energy 13:1 (1991), 1–21.
113. Siegel, I.H., The bideal Q index-number formula. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 40 (1945), 520–523.
114. Stanwix, G., Pham, P., Ball, A., 2015. End-use energy intensity in Australia, Department of Industry and Science, Canberra.
115. Su, B., Ang, B.W., Multi-region input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: the feedback effects. Ecol. Econ. 71 (2011), 42–53.
116. Su, B., Ang, B.W., Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: aggregation issues. Econ. Syst. Res. 24:3 (2012), 299–317.
117. Su, B., Ang, B.W., Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Econ. 34 (2012), 177–188.
118. Su, B., Ang, B.W., Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: competitive versus non-competitive imports. Energy Policy 56 (2013), 83–87.
119. Su, B., Ang, B.W., Attribution of changes in the generalized Fisher index with application to embodied emission studies. Energy 69 (2014), 778–786.
120. Su, B., Ang, B.W., Multiplicative decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity change using input-output analysis. Appl. Energy 154 (2015), 13–20.
121. Su, B., Ang, B.W., Multi-region comparisons of emission performance: the structural decomposition analysis approach. Ecol. Indic. 67 (2016), 78–87.
122. Su, B., Ang, B., Li, Y., Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore's carbon emissions. Energy Policy 105 (2017), 484–492.
123. Su, B., Ang, B.W., Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Economics 65 (2017), 137–147.
124. Sun, J.W., Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Econ. 20 (1998), 85–100.
125. Sun, J.W., Ang, B.W., Some properties of an exact energy decomposition model. Energy 25 (2000), 1177–1188.
126. Tian, X., Chang, M., Lin, C., Tanikawa, H., China's carbon footprint: a regional perspective on the effect of transitions in consumption and production patterns. Appl. Energy 123 (2014), 19–28.
127. Tian, X., Chang, M., Tanikawa, H., Shi, F., Imura, H., Structural decomposition analysis of the carbonization process in Beijing: a regional explanation of rapid increasing carbon dioxide emission in China. Energy Policy 53 (2013), 279–286.
128. Voigt, S., De Cian, E., Schymura, M., Verdolini, E., Energy intensity developments in 40 major economies: structural change or technology improvement?. Energy Econ. 41 (2014), 47–62.
129. Wadeskog, A., Palm, V., 2003. Structural decomposition of environmental accounts data-The Swedish case. Statistics Sweden.
130. Wang, H., Ang, B.W., Su, B., Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of energy and emission intensities: some methodological issues. Energy 123 (2017), 47–63.
131. Wu, J.H., Chen, Y.Y., Huang, Y.H., Trade pattern change impact on industrial CO2 emissions in Taiwan. Energy Policy 35 (2007), 5436–5446.
132. Wu, R., Geng, Y., Dong, H., Fujita, T., Tian, X., Changes of CO2 emissions embodied in China–Japan trade: drivers and implications. J. Clean. Prod. 112:Part 5 (2016), 4151–4158.
133. Xu, J.-H., Fan, Y., Yu, S.-M., Energy conservation and CO2 emission reduction in China's 11th Five-Year Plan: a performance evaluation. Energy Econ. 46 (2014), 348–359.
134. Xu, M., Li, R., Crittenden, J.C., Chen, Y., CO2 emissions embodied in China's exports from 2002 to 2008: a structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 7381–7388.
135. Xu, X.Y., Ang, B.W., Multilevel index decomposition analysis: approaches and application. Energy Econ. 44 (2014), 375–382.
136. Xu, Y., Dietzenbacher, E., A structural decomposition analysis of the emissions embodied in trade. Ecol. Econ. 101 (2014), 10–20.
137. Yu, Y., Ren, H., Kharrazi, A., Ma, T., Zhu, B., Exploring socioeconomic drivers of environmental pressure on the city level: the case study of Chongqing in China. Ecol. Econ. 118 (2015), 123–131.
138. Zeng, L., Xu, M., Liang, S., Zeng, S., Zhang, T., Revisiting drivers of energy intensity in China during 1997–2007: a structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 67 (2014), 640–647.
139. Zhang, F., The energy transition of the transition economies: an empirical analysis. Energy Econ. 40 (2013), 679–686.
140. Zhang, H., Lahr, M.L., China's energy consumption change from 1987 to 2007: a multi-regional structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 67 (2014), 682–693.
141. Zhang, M., Liu, X., Wang, W., Zhou, M., Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from electricity generation in China. Energy Policy 52 (2013), 159–165.
142. Zhang, Y., Structural decomposition analysis of sources of decarbonizing economic development in China: 1992–2006. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2399–2405.
143. Zhang, Y., Supply-side structural effect on carbon emissions in China. Energy Econ. 32 (2010), 186–193.
144. Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Yang, J., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Input-output analysis of carbon emissions embodied in China-Japan trade. Appl. Econ. 48:16 (2016), 1515–1529.
145. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., 2014. Index decomposition analysis for tracking energy efficiency trends. Book Chapter in the Handbook of Environmental Economics.
146. Zhu, Q., Peng, X., Wu, K., Calculation and decomposition of indirect carbon emissions from residential consumption in China based on the input–output model. Energy Policy 48 (2012), 618–626.