Energy embodied in the international trade of China: An energy input-output analysis

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 3957-3964

  Liu, Hongtao ^a,b   Xi, Youmin ^a   Guo, Ju'e ^a   Li, Xia ^a  

^a XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Embodied energy; Energy input output analysis; Structural decomposition analysis

Indexed keywords

CHINESE ECONOMY; DRIVING FORCES; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EMBODIED ENERGY; ENERGY FLOW; ENERGY INPUTS; INPUT-OUTPUT; INTERMEDIATE INPUTS; KEY FACTORS; PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; PRIMARY ENERGIES; PRIMARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY RESOURCES; STATISTICS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EXPORT; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; NATURAL RESOURCE;

CHINA;

EID: 77953693527     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Asia Economic Institute, 2009. China grows to be the world's third largest economy. http://www.asiaecon.org/special_articles/read_sp/12024/0/.
2. Ang B.W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method?. Energy Policy 2004, 32(9):1131-1139.
3. Ang B.W., Liu F.L. A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation. Energy 2001, 26(6):537-548.
4. Bullard C.W., Herendeen R.A. The energy cost of goods and services. Energy Policy 1975, 3(4):268-278.
5. Bullard C.W., Penner P.S., Pilati D.A. Net energy analysis: handbook for combining process and input-output analysis. Resources and Energy 1978, 1(3):267-313.
6. Casler S.D., Hannon B. Readjustment potentials in industrial energy efficiency and structure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1989, 17:93-108.
7. Casler S.D., Rose A. Carbon dioxide emissions in the US economy. Environmental and Resource Economics 1998, 11(3-4):349-363.
8. 2 emission (1989-2004) in Taiwan by input-output structural decomposition. Energy Policy 2008, 36(7):2471-2480.
9. Cohen C., Lenzen M., Schaeffer R. Energy requirements of households in Brazil. Energy Policy 2005, 33(4):555-562.
10. Dietzenbacher E., Los B. Structural decomposition techniques: sense and sensitivity. Economic Systems Research 1998, 10(4):307-323.
11. Hawdon D., Pearson P. Input-output simulations of energy, environment, economy interactions in the UK. Energy Economics 1995, 17(1):73-86.
12. Hoekstra R., van den Bergh J.C.J.M. Structural decomposition analysis of physical flows in the economy. Environmental and Resource Economics 2002, 23(3):357-378.
13. Hu J.L., Wang S.C. Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy 2006, 34(17):3206-3217.
14. Kagawa S., Inamura H. A structural decomposition of energy consumption based on a hybrid rectangular input-output framework: Japan's case. Economic Systems Research 2001, 13:339-363.
15. 2 emissions in Japan: influences of imports and exports. Applied Energy 1998, 59(2-3):163-174.
16. Leontief W. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1970, 52(3):262-271.
17. Lenzen M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 1998, 26(6):495-506.
18. Lenzen M., Dey C., Foran B. Energy requirements of Sydney households. Ecological Economics 2004, 49(3):375-399.
19. Li H., Zhang P.D., He C., Wang G. Evaluating the effects of embodied energy in international trade on ecological footprint in China. Ecological Economics 2007, 62(1):136-148.
20. Li Y., Hewitt C.N. The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy 2008, 36(6):1907-1914.
21. 2 emissions in China. Energy Policy 2007, 35(3):1685-1700.
22. Liao H., Fan Y., Wei Y.M. What induced China's energy intensity to fluctuate: 1997-2006?. Energy Policy 2007, 35(9):4640-4649.
23. Limmeechokchai B., Suksuntornsiri P. Embedded energy and total greenhouse gas emissions in final consumptions within Thailand. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2007, 11(2):259-281.
24. Liu L.C., Wu G., Wei Y.M. Changes in carbon intensity in China: empirical findings from 1980-2003. Ecological Economics 2007, 62(3-4):683-691.
25. Liu N., Ang B.W. Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: energy intensity versus product mix. Energy Economics 2007, 29(4):609-635.
26. Llop M. Economic structure and pollution intensity within the environmental input-output framework. Energy Policy 2007, 35(6):3410-3417.
27. Machado Giovani, Schaeffer Roberto, Worrell Ernst Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input-output approach. Ecological Economics 2001, 39(3):409-424.
28. Ma C., Stern David I. China's changing energy intensity trend: a decomposition analysis. Energy Economics 2008, 30(3):1037-1053.
29. Mäenpää Ilmo, Siikavirta Hanne Greenhouse gases embodied in the international trade and final consumption of Finland: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 2007, 35(1):128-143.
30. Murthy N.S., Panda M., Parikh J. Economic development, poverty reduction and carbon emissions in India. Energy Economics 1997, 19(3):327-354.
31. National Bureau of Statistics of China China Statistical Yearbook 2008 2008, China Statistics Press.
32. 2 emissions of Japanese industries during the period between 1985 and 1995. Energy Policy 2004, 32(5):595-610.
33. Pachauri S., Spreng D. Direct and indirect energy requirements of households in India. Energy Policy 2002, 30(6):511-523.
34. Pan J., Phillips J., Chen Y. China's balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2008, 24(2):354-376.
35. Park H.C., Heo E. The direct and indirect household energy requirements in the Republic of Korea from 1980 to 2000-an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 2008, 35(5):2839-2851.
36. Peters Glen P., Hertwich Edgar G. Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Global Environmental Change 2006, 16(4):379-387.
37. 2 emissions-a race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains. Environmental Science and Technology 2007, 41(17):5939-5944.
38. Polenske Karen R., McMichael Francis C. A Chinese cokemaking process-flow model for energy and environmental analyses. Energy Policy 2002, 30(10):865-883.
39. Rose A., Casler S. Input-output structural decomposition analysis: a critical appraisal. Economic Systems Research 1996, 8(1):33-62.
40. Schaeffer R., Leal de Sá A. The embodiment of carbon associated with Brazilian imports and exports. Energy Conversion and Management 1996, 37(6-8):955-960.
41. 2 embodiment in US-China trade. Energy Policy 2006, 34(18):4063-4068.
42. 2 emissions in the OECD: 1960-1995. The Energy Journal 1999, 20(3):147-155.
43. Tuyet T.A., Ishihara K. Analysis of changing hidden energy flow in Vietnam. Energy Policy 2006, 34(14):1883-1888.
44. Vanden K.F., Jefferson G.H., Liu H., Tao Q. What is driving China's decline in energy intensity?. Resource and Energy Economics 2004, 26(1):77-97.
45. Wassily Leontief Composite commodities and the problem of index numbers. Econometrica 1936, 4(1):39-59.
46. Weber C.L. Measuring structural change and energy use: decomposition of the US economy from 1997 to 2002. Energy Policy 2009, 37(4):1561-1570.
47. Wiedmann M., Lenzen K., Turner K., Barrett J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities-part 2: review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics 2007, 61(1):15-26.
48. Wood R., Lenzen M. Structural path decomposition. Energy Economics 2009, 31(3):335-341.
49. Wu R.H., Chen C.Y. On the application of input-output analysis to energy issues. Energy Economics 1990, 12(1):71-76.