Trust and the poverty trap

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 114, Issue 21, 2017, Pages 5327-5329

  Farah, Martha J ^a   Hook, Cayce J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; COMMUNITY; CROATIAN (CITIZEN); DECISION MAKING; DELAY DISCOUNTING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HIGHEST INCOME GROUP; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MEMORY; NOTE; PENSION; POVERTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETIREMENT; SOCIAL STATUS; TRUST; INCOME;

INCOME; POVERTY; TRUST;

EID: 85019546597     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704798114     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Peart SJ (2000) Irrationality and intertemporal choice in early neoclassical thought. Can J Econ 33:175-189.
2. Jachimowicz JM, Chafik S, Munrat S, Prabhu JC, Weber EU (2017) Community trust reduces myopic decisions of low-income individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:5401-5406.
3. Gottfried AW, Gottfried AE, Bathurst K, Guerin DW, Parramore MM (2003) Socioeconomic status in children's development and family environment: Infancy through adolescence. Socioeconomic Status, Parenting and Child Development, eds Bornstein MH, Bradley RH (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), pp 189-207.
4. Herrmann D, Guadagno MA (1997) Memory performance and socio-economic status. Appl Cogn Psychol 11:113-120.
5. Lawson GM, Hook CJ, Farah MJ A meta-analysis of the relationship between socioeconomic status and executive function performance among children. Dev Sci, in press.
6. Sirin SR (2005) Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Rev Educ Res 75:417-453.
7. Golsteyn BH, Grönqvist H, Lindahl L (2014) Adolescent time preferences predict lifetime outcomes. Econ J (Oxf) 124:F739-F761.
8. Brown JR, Ivkovi c Z, Weisbenner S (2015) Empirical determinants of intertemporal choice. J Financ Econ 116:473-486.
9. Lewis O (1966) La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty-San Juan and New York (Random House, New York).
10. Mullainathan S, Shafir E (2013) Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much (Macmillan, New York).
11. Haushofer J, Fehr E (2014) On the psychology of poverty. Science 344:862-867.
12. Joshi PD, Fast NJ (2013) Power and reduced temporal discounting. Psychol Sci 24:432-438.
13. Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Delton AW, Robertson TE (2011) The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 100:1015-1026.
14. Perry JL, Stairs DJ, Bardo MT (2008) Impulsive choice and environmental enrichment: Effects of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate. Behav Brain Res 193:48-54.
15. Darna M, Beckmann JS, Gipson CD, Bardo MT, Dwoskin LP (2015) Effect of environmental enrichment on dopamine and serotonin transporters and glutamate neurotransmission in medial prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex. Brain Res 1599:115-125.
16. Sweitzer MM, et al. (2013) Polymorphic variation in the dopamine D4 receptor predicts delay discounting as a function of childhood socioeconomic status: Evidence for differential susceptibility. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8:499-508.