Continuous Material Flow Analysis Approach for Bulk Nonmetallic Mineral Building Materials Applied to the German Building Sector

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 673-688

  Schiller, Georg ^a   Gruhler, Karin ^a   Ortlepp, Regine ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGICAL URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

bulk nonmetallic mineral building materials; circular economy; continuous MFA (C MFA); industrial ecology; material flow analysis (MFA); recycling

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES; BUILDING MATERIALS; CONCRETE AGGREGATES; CONCRETES; DEMOLITION; MINERAL RESOURCES; MINERALS; RECYCLING; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

CIRCULAR ECONOMY; CONTINUOUS MFA (C-MFA); INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; MATERIAL FLOW ANALYSIS; NONMETALLIC MINERALS;

BUILDINGS;

BUILDING; CONCRETE; CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; MATERIAL FLOW ANALYSIS; MINERAL; PROCESSING; RECYCLING; RESOURCE ECONOMY; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE TECHNOLOGY;

GERMANY;

EID: 85019459747     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12595     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adriaanse, A., S. Bringezu, Y. Hammond, E. Moriguchi, D. Rodenburg, D. Rogich, and H. Schütz. 1997. Resource flows: The material basis of industrial economies. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
2. Agrela, F., M. Sánchez de Juan, J. Ayuso, V. L. Geraldes, and J. R. Jiménez. 2011. Limiting properties in the characterisation of mixed recycled aggregates for use in the manufacture of concrete. Construction and Building Materials 25(10): 3950–3955.
3. Angulo, S. C., P. M. Carrijo, A. D. igueiredo, A. P. Chaves, and V. M. John. 2010. On the classification of mixed construction and demolition waste aggregate by porosity and its impact on the mechanical performance of concrete. Materials and Structures 43(4): 519–528.
4. Baustoff-Recycling Bayern. 2008. Merkblatt für recycliertes Brechgut aus Betonrestmassen [Leaflet for recycled crushed material from residual concrete mass]. München: Baustoff Recycling Bayern e.V. Vol. 2008.
5. Baynes, T. M. and D. B. Müller. 2016. A socio-economic metabolism approach to sustainable development and climate change mitigation. In Taking stock of industrial ecology, edited by R. Clift and A. Druckman. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. pp. 117–135. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-20571-7_6.
6. BBR (Bundessamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung). 2009. Raumordnungsprognose 2025/2050. Bevölkerung, private Haushalte, Erwerbspersonen [Planning forecast 2025/2050. Population, households, labor force]. BBR-Berichte Vol. 29, Bonn, Germany: Bundessamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung.
7. BCA (Building and Construction Authority). 2008. Sustainable construction: A guide on the use of recycled materials. In BCA sustainable construction series, Vol. 4. Singapore: Building and Construction Authority.
8. Bergsdal, H., R. A. Bohne, and H. Brattebø. 2008. Projection of construction and demolition waste in Norway. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(3): 27–39.
9. Bilitewski, B. and G. Härdtle. 2013. Abfallwirtschaft. Handbuch für Praxis und Lehre [Waste management. Manual for practice and teaching], 4th ed. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
10. Breit, W. and J. Scheit. 2016. Aktuelle Ergebnisse aus dem im HighTechMatBau geförderten BMBF-Forschungsvorhaben R-Beton [Current results from the research project R-concrete funded by the BMBF-HighTechMatBau-programme]. In Fachtagung Recycling R-16, 19–20 September, Weimar, Germany.
11. Brito, J., A. S. Pereira, and J. R. Correia. 2005. Mechanical behaviour of non-structural concrete made with recycled ceramic aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites 27(4): 429–433.
12. Buchert, M., U. Fritsche, W. Jenseit, L. Rausch, C. Deilmann, G. Schiller, S. Siedentop, and A. Lipkow. 2004. Stoffflussbezogene Bausteine für ein nationales Konzept der nachhaltigen Entwicklung—Verknüpfung des Bereiches Bauen und Wohnen mit dem komplementären Bereich öffentliche Infrastruktur [Material flow related components for a national concept of sustainable development—Linking the sector building and living with the complementary sector of public infrastructure]. Text 01/04. Berlin: UBA.
13. Cha, H., K. Kim, and C. Kim. 2012. Case study on selective demolition method for refurbishing deteriorated domestic apartments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 138(2): 294–303.
14. Bru, K., Y. Menard, S. Touzé, A. Le Moign, J. E. Poirier et al. 2011. Innovative process routes for a high-quality concrete recycling in the aggregates and cement industries. In SARDINIA 2011—Thirteenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, 3–7 October, Cagliari, Italy. p. 1.
15. DAfStb. 2010. DAfStb Beton, rezyklierte Gesteinskörnung:2010-09. DAfStb-Richtline: Beton nach DIN EN 206-1 und DIN 1045-2 mit rezyklierten Gesteinskörnungen nach DIN EN 12620, Teil 1: Anforderungen an den Beton für die Bemessung nach DIN EN 1992-1-1 [DAfStb guideline Concrete according to EN 206-1 and DIN 1045-2 with RA according to EN 12620, Part 1: Requirements for the concrete for dimensioning in accordance with EN 1992-1-1]. Berlin: Beuth.
16. Deilmann, C. 2015. Building mining—Sensitivity study of recycling potentials until 2050. In Mining the technosphere: Drivers and barriers, challenges and opportunities, edited by J. Lederer et al. Proceedings of International Workshop on Technospheric Mining. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology.
17. De Schepper, M., P. van den Heede, I. van Driessche, and N. De Belie. 2014. Life cycle assessment of completely recyclable concrete. Materials 2014 7(8): 6010–6027.
18. Destatis. 1999. Bautätigkeit und Wohnen [Building activity and housing]. Subject-matter series 5, Series 1: Construction. Stuttgart, Germany: Metzler-Poeschel.
19. DΙΝ 4226−100: 2002−02. 2002. Gesteinskörnungen für Beton und Mörtel—Teil 100: Rezyklierte Gesteinskörnungen [Aggregates for concrete and mortar—Part 100: Recycled aggregates]. Berlin: Beuth.
20. EC (European Commission). 2014. Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. (COM(2014) 398 final). Brussels: EC.
21. EC (European Commission). 2015. Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. (COM(2015) 614 final). Brussels: EC.
22. EN 12620 2013. Aggregates for concrete. Berlin: Beuth.
23. EN 206 2013. Concrete. Specification, performance, production and conformity. Berlin: Beuth.
24. EN 933-11 2009. Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates. Classification test for the constituents of coarse recycled aggregate. Berlin: Beuth.
25. Gruhler, K. and R. Böhm. 2011. Auswirkungen des demografischen Wandels auf das Stofflager und die Stoffflüsse des Wohngebäudebestandes—Deutschland 2050. [Impact of demographic change on the material stock and material flows of the housing stock—Germany 2050]. Stuttgart, Germany: Fraunhofer IRB, Series Science no. 25.
26. Gruhler, K. and C. Deilmann. 2010. Despite all strategies for enhancing resource efficiency, per capita material stock is increasing—Housing stock and building materials flows in Germany 2050. In Central Europe towards sustainable building—From theory to practice, edited by P. Hajek et al. Proceedings of CESB 10. Prague: Czech Technical University.
27. Haas, W., F. Krausmann, D. Wiedenhofer, and M. Heinz. 2015. How circular is the global economy?: An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the european union and the world in 2005. Journal of Industrial Ecology 19: 765–777.
28. Hansen, T. C. 1986. Recycled aggregates and recycled aggregate concrete: Second state-of-the-art report: Developments 1945–1985. Materials and Stuctures 19(3): 201–246.
29. Hashimoto, S., H. Tanikawa, and Y. Moriguchi. 2007. Where will large amounts of materials accumulated within the economy go?—A material flow analysis of construction minerals for Japan. Waste Management 27(12): 1725–1738.
30. Hendriks, C. F. and G. M. T. Jannsen. 2004. A new vision on the building cycle. Boxtel, the Netherlands: Æneas Technical Publishers.
31. Hoffmann, C. and F. Jacobs. 2007. Recyclingbeton aus Beton- und Mischabbruchgranulat: Sachstandsbericht [Recycled concrete made of RCA and RA: State-of-the-art-report]. Dübendorf, Switzerland: EMPA.
32. Hu, M., E. van der Voet, and G. Huppes. 2010. Dynamic material flow. Analysis for strategic construction and demolition waste management in Beijing. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14(3): 440–456.
33. Huang, B., X. Shu, and E. G. Burdette. 2006. Mechanical properties of concrete containing recycled asphalt pavements. Magazine of Concrete Research 58(5): 313–320.
34. Kuosa, H. 2012. Reuse of recycled aggregates and other C&D wastes. Research report. Espoo, Finland: VTT Finland.
35. KWTBau KREISLAUFWIRTSCHAFTSTRÃGER BAU 1996–2008. Monitoring-Berichte 1 bis 7 (1996–2008) [Monitoring reports 1 to 7 (1996–2008)]. Berlin/üsseldorf/Duisburg: Arbeitsgemeinschaft e.V. http://www.kreislaufwirtschaft-bau.de/#whyus. Accessed 24 January 2017.
36. Laner, D., H. Rechberger, and T. Astrup. 2014. Systematic evaluation of uncertainty in material flow analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 18(6): 859–870.
37. Limbachiya, M. C., T. Leelawat, and R. K. Dhir. 2000. Use of recycled concrete aggregate in high-strength concrete. Materials and Structures 33(9): 574–580.
38. Mas, B., A. Cladera, T. del Olmo, and F. Pitarch. 2012. Influence of the amount of mixed recycled aggregates on the properties of concrete for non-structural use. Construction and Building Materials 27(1): 612–622.
39. Miliutenko, S. 2009. Aggregate provision and sustainability issues in selected European cities around the Baltic Sea. Master's thesis, KTH, Department of Urban Planning and Environment Division of Environmental Strategies Research—fms, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, Stockholm.
40. Moriguchi, Y. and S. Hashimoto. 2016. Material flow analysis and waste management. In Taking stock of industrial ecology, edited by R. Clift and A. Druckman. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. pp. 247–262. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-20571-7_12.
41. Mulder, E., T. P. R. de Jong, and L. Feenstra. 2007. Closed cycle construction: An integrated process for the separation and reuse of C&D waste. Waste Management 27(10): 1408–1415.
42. Müller, A. 2013a. Opportunities and limitations of concrete recycling (part 1). BFT International 79(4): 78–92.
43. Müller, A. 2013b. Opportunities and limitations of concrete recycling (part 2). BFT International 79(5): 28–39.
44. Müller, A. 2015. Progress in the recycling of masonry rubble (part 1). Zi Ziegelindustrie International 2015(1): 20–26.
45. Müller, D. B. 2006. Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows—Case study for housing in the Netherlands. Ecologic Economics 59(1): 142–156.
46. Nicolai, M. 1997. Zur Konfiguration von verfahrenstechnischen Anlagen zum wirtschaftlichen Recycling von Bauschutt [On the configuration of process plants for economic recycling of construction waste]. Dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
47. Nobis, C. and A. Vollpracht. 2015. Verwendung von Recyclingmaterial in der Betonproduktion—Sachstand [Use of recycled materials in concrete production—State-of-the-Art]. Research report no. F 7099. Aachen, Germany: RWTH, IBAC.
48. Oikonomou, N. D. 2005. Recycled concrete aggregates. Cement & Concrete Composites 27(2): 315–318.
49. Ortlepp, R., K. Gruhler, and G. Schiller. 2016a. Material stocks in Germany's non-domestic buildings: A new quantification method. Building Research & Information 44(8): 840–862.
50. Ortlepp, R., K. Gruhler, and G. Schiller. 2016b. Materials in Germany's domestic building stock: calculation model and uncertainties. Building Research & Information, Early View. http://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1264121.
51. Pacheco-Torgal, F., L.-F. Cabeza, J. Labrincha, and A. de Magalhães. 2014. Eco efficient construction and building materials. Oxford, UK: Woodhead.
52. Pauliuk, S., R. L. Milford, D. B. Müller, and J. M. Allwood. 2013. The steel scrap age. Environmental Science & Technology 47(7): 3448–3454.
53. Raess, C., M. Hiete, and O. Rentz. 2006. A planning system for waste management on construction sites. In Abfall und Deponietechnik, Altlasten, Abfallwirtschaft [Waste and landfill engineering, contaminated sites, waste management], edited by A. Vogrin. Proceedings of 8th DepoTech Conference, 22–24 November, Montanuniversität, Loeben, Austria. Essen, Germany: VGE Verlag.
54. Reformat, M. 2016. Mechanische Aktivierung von Altbetonbrechsand—Grundlagenuntersuchung [Mechanical activation of crushed concrete sand—Basic investigation]. In Fachtagung Recycling R-16, 19–20 September, Weimar, Germany.
55. Rao, A., K. N. Jha, and S. Misra. 2007. Use of aggregates from recycled construction and demolition waste in concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 50: 71–81.
56. Saiz-Martínez, P., W. González-Cortina, and F. Fernández-Martínez. 2015. Characterization and influence of fine recycled aggregates on masonry mortars properties. Materiales de Construcción 65(319): e058.
57. Sánchez-Roldán, Z., M. Martín-Morales, I. Valverde-Palacios, I. Valverde-Espinosa, and M. Zamorano. 2016. Study of potential advantages of pre-soaking on the properties of pre-cast concrete made with recycled coarse aggregate. Materiales de Construcción 66(321): e076.
58. Schiller, G., C. Deilmann, J. Reichenbach, K. Gruhler, P. Röhm, J. Baumann, and M. Günther. 2010. Ermittlung von Ressoucenschonungspotenzialen bei der Verwertung von Bauabfällen und Erarbeitung von Empfehlungen zu deren Nutzung [Determining resource conservation potentials in the recovery of construction waste and formulating recommendations on their use]. Text no. 56/2010. Berlin: UBA.
59. Schiller, G., F. Müller, and R. Ortlepp. 2016. Mapping the anthropogenic stock in Germany to support evidence-based policies towards the circular economy. Resources, Conservation & Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.007.
60. Schubert, S. and C. Hoffmann. 2011. Grundlagen für die Verwendung von Recyclingbeton mit Mischgranulat [Bases for the use of recycled concrete with mixed granulate]. Final report of cemsuisse-Projekt 200602. Bern: cemsuisse. http://www.cemsuisse.ch/cemsuisse/forschung/forschungsberichte/berichte_2011/index.html?lang=de. Accessed 1 May 2017.
61. Schultmann, F. and N. Sunke. 2007. Energy oriented deconstruction and recovery planning. Building Research and Information 35(6): 602–615.
62. Schultmann, F. and N. Sunke. 2006. Closed-loop oriented project management in construction: An approach for sustainable construction management, in: Proceedings of Conference Rethinking Sustainable Construction 2006, 19–22 September, Sarasota, FL, USA.
63. Shima, H., H. Tateyashiki, R. Matsuhashi, and Y. Yoshida. 2005. An advanced concrete recycling technology and its applicability assessment through input-output analysis. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology 3(1): 53–67.
64. SIA 2030. 2010. Recyclingbeton. [Recycled concrete]. Zürich: Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA).
65. Statistische Ämter. 2007. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder: Statistik lokal—Ausgabe 2007 [Federal Statistical Office and the Statistical Offices of the Länder: Statistics local—Vol. 2007].
66. SUN (Stiftungsfonds für Umweltökonomie und Nachhaltigkeit), Ellen MacArthur Foundation, McKinsey Center for Business and Environment, eds. 2015. Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/growth-within-a-circular-economy-vision-for-a-competitive-europe. Accessed 25 April 2016.
67. Tabsh, S. W. and A. S. Abdelfatah. 2009. Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on strength properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials 23(2): 1163–1167.
68. Tanikawa, H., T. Fishman, K. Okuoka, and K. Sugimoto. 2015. The weight of society over time and space: A comprehensive account of the construction material stock of Japan, 1945–2010. Journal of Industrial Ecology 19(5): 778–791.
69. UNEP (United Nations Environment Program) International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management: Working Group on the Global Metal Flows, ed. 2010. Metal stocks in society: Scientific synthesis. Paris: UNEP DTIE. www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Portals/24102/PDFs/Metalstocksinsociety.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2016.
70. VDI 2014. Kurzanalyse Nr. 8: Potenziale eines hochwertigen Recyclings im Baubereich [Short analysis No. 8: Potentials of a high-quality recycling in the building sector]. Berlin: VDI ZRE. http://www.ressource-deutschland.de/publikationen/kurzanalysen/?L=0. Accessed 24 January 2017.
71. Weimann, K., J. Matyschik, C. Adam, T. Schulz, E. Linß and A. Müller. 2013. Optimierung des Rückbaus/Abbruchs von Gebäuden zur Rückgewinnung und Aufbereitung von Baustoffen unter Schadstoffentfrachtung (insbes. Sulfat) des RC-Materials sowie ökobilanzieller Vergleich von Primär- und Sekundärrohstoffeinsatz inkl. Wiederverwertung [Optimization of demolition/dismantling of buildings for the recovery and treatment of building materials considering the reduction of harmful substances (in particular sulphates) in the recycled building material and aspects of life-cycle analyses]. Text no. 05/2013. Berlin: UBA. www.uba.de/uba-info-medien/4430.html. Accessed 25 April 2016.
72. Wiedenhofer, D., J. K. Steinberger, N. Eisenmenger, and W. Haas. 2015. Maintenance and expansion: Modeling material stocks and flows for residential buildings and transportation networks in the EU25. Journal of Industrial Ecology 19: 538–551.
73. Wilbrun, D. R. and T. G. Goonan. 1998. Aggregates from natural recycled sources. Economic assessment for construction applications—A materials flow analysis. U.S. Geological Survey Circular no. 1176. Denver, CO, USA: U.S. Department of the Interior. http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1998/c1176/c1176.html. Accessed 25 April 2016.