The index of ideality of correlation: A criterion of predictive potential of QSPR/QSAR models?

Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis

Volumn 819, Issue , 2017, Pages 31-37

  Toropov, Andrey A ^a   Toropova, Alla P ^a  

^a MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

Author keywords

CORAL software; Index of ideality of correlation; Mutagenicity; Predictive potential; QSAR; Salmonella typhimurium

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; INDEX OF IDEALITY OF CORRELATION; MODEL; MUTAGENIC ACTIVITY; MUTAGENICITY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATION; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM; BIOASSAY; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

MUTAGENIC AGENT;

ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUTAGENS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85019367537     PISSN: 13835718     EISSN: 18793592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2017.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Feinberg, M., Constitutive equations for ideal gas mixtures and ideal solutions as consequences of simple postulates. Chem. Eng. Sci. 32:1 (1977), 75–78.
2. Yalkowsky, S.H., Estimation of the aqueous solubility of complex organic compounds. Chemosphere 26:7 (1993), 1239–1261.
3. Hill, R., Milstein, F., Principles of stability analysis of ideal crystals. Phys. Rev. B 15:6 (1977), 3087–3096.
4. Toropov, A.A., Toropova, A.P., Method of ideal symmetry in four-dimensional space: implementation in the QSPR studies on the thermochemistry of complex compounds. Russ. J. Coord. Chem./Koord. Khim. 23:10 (1997), 741–747.
5. Wiener, H., Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 69:1 (1947), 17–20.
6. Wiener, H., Relation of the physical properties of the isomeric alkanes to molecular structure: surface tension, specific dispersion, and critical solution temperature in aniline. J. Phys. Colloid. Chem. 52:6 (1948), 1082–1089.
7. Golbraikh, A., Tropsha, A., Beware of q2!. J Mol. Graph. Model 20:4 (2002), 269–276.
8. Roy, K., On some aspects of validation of predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship models. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2:12 (2007), 1567–1577.
9. Chirico, N., Gramatica, P., Real external predictivity of QSAR models: how to evaluate It? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51:9 (2011), 2320–2335.
10. Matsushita, T., Hashizuka, M., Kuriyama, T., Matsui, Y., Shirasaki, N., Use of orbitrap-MS/MS and QSAR analyses to estimate mutagenic transformation products of iopamidol generated during ozonation and chlorination. Chemosphere 148 (2016), 233–240.
11. Matsushita, T., Kobayashi, N., Hashizuka, M., Sakuma, H., Kondo, T., Matsui, Y., Shirasaki, N., Changes in mutagenicity and acute toxicity of solutions of iodinated X-ray contrast media during chlorination. Chemosphere 135 (2015), 101–107.
12. Toropov, A.A., Toropova, A.P., Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic data into endpoint prediction: mutagenicity of fullerene as a mathematical function of conditions. Chemosphere 104 (2014), 262–264.
13. Toropov, A.A., Toropova, A.P., Quasi-QSAR for mutagenic potential of multi-walled carbon-nanotubes. Chemosphere 124:1 (2015), 40–46.
14. Toropov, A.A., Toropova, A.P., Quasi-SMILES and nano-QFAR: United model for mutagenicity of fullerene and MWCNT under different conditions. Chemosphere 139 (2015), 18–22.
15. Plošnik, A., Zupan, J., Vračko, M., Evaluation of toxic endpoints for a set of cosmetic ingredients with CAESAR models. Chemosphere 120 (2015), 492–499.
16. Carlsen, L., Kenesova, O.A., Batyrbekova, S.E., A preliminary assessment of the potential environmental and human health impact of unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine as a result of space activities. Chemosphere 67:6 (2007), 1108–1116.
17. Chroust, K., Pavlová, M., Prokop, Z., Mendel, J., Božková, K., Kubát, Z., Zajíčková, V., Damborský, J., Quantitative structure-activity relationships for toxicity and genotoxicity of halogenated aliphatic compounds: wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster. Chemosphere 67:1 (2007), 152–159.
18. Cash, G., Prediction of the genotoxicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines using electrotopological state indices. Mutat. Res. 491 (2001), 31–37.
19. Veselinovic, J.B., Nikolic, G.M., Trutic, N.V., Živkovic, J.V., Veselinovic, A.M., Monte Carlo QSAR models for predicting organophosphate inhibition of acetylcholinesterase. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 26:6 (2015), 449–460.
20. Achary, P.G.R., QSPR modelling of dielectric constants of π-conjugated organic compounds by means of the CORAL software. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25:6 (2014), 507–526.
21. Achary, P.G.R., Simplified molecular input line entry system-based optimal descriptors: QSAR modelling for voltage-gated potassium channel subunit Kv7.2. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25:1 (2014), 73–90.
22. Ghaedi, A., Predicting the cytotoxicity of ionic liquids using QSAR model based on SMILES optimal descriptors. J. Mol. Liq. 208 (2015), 269–279.
23. Toropova, A.P., Toropov, A.A., Veselinovic, J.B., Veselinovic, A.M., QSAR as a random event: a case of NOAEL. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22:11 (2014), 8264–8271.
24. Toropova, A.P., Toropov, A.A., Rallo, R., Leszczynska, D., Leszczynski, J., Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic data into prediction of cytotoxicity for metal oxide nanoparticles under different conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 112 (2015), 39–45.
25. Toropov, A.A., Toropova, A.P., Martyanov, S.E., Benfenati, E., Gini, G., Leszczynska, D., Leszczynski, J., Comparison of SMILES and molecular graphs as the representation of the molecular structure for QSAR analysis for mutagenic potential of polyaromatic amines. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 109:1 (2011), 94–100.
26. Toropova, A.P., Toropov, A.A., Raskova, M., Raska, I., Improved building up a model of toxicity towards Pimephales promelas by the Monte Carlo method. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 48 (2016), 278–285.
27. Hawkins, D.M., Basak, S.C., Mills, D., Assessing model fit by cross-validation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (2003), 579–586.
28. 2 metrics and regression through origin approach: reliable and useful validation tools for predictive QSAR models (Commentary on ‘Is regression through origin useful in external validation of QSAR models?'). Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 62 (2014), 111–114.
29. Cash, G.G., Anderson, B., Mayo, K., Bogaczyk, S., Tunkel, J., Predicting genotoxicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines using electrotopological state indices. Mutat. Res. 585 (2005), 170–183.
30. Bhat, K.L., Hayik, S., Sztandera, L., Bock, C.W., Mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines and related compounds: a QSAR investigation. QSAR Comb. Sci. 24 (2005), 831–843.
31. Leong, M.K., Lin, S.-W., Chen, H.-B., Tsai, F.-Y., Predicting mutagenicity of aromatic amines by various machine learning approaches. Toxicol. Sci. 116:2 (2010), 498–513.
32. Valkova, I., Vračko, M., Basak, S.C., Modeling of structure-mutagenicity relationships: counter propagation neural network approach using calculated structural descriptors. Anal. Chim. Acta 509:2 (2004), 179–186.
33. Vracko, M., Mills, D., Basak, S.C., Structure-mutagenicity modelling using counter propagation neural networks. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 16:1-2 (2004), 25–36.