Integrated knowledge translation: Digging deeper,moving forward

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 71, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 619-623

  Kothari, Anita ^a   Wathen, C Nadine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA MANAGEMENT; DATA MINING; HEALTH POLICY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; KNOWLEDGE; PLANNING PROCESS; POLICY MAKING; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RESEARCH WORK;

CONSENSUS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INVESTMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MODEL; SCIENTIST; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; STANDARDS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; TRENDS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85019266462     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2016-208490     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Kothari A, Wathen CN. A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy 2013;109:187-91.
2. Gagliardi AR, Berta W, Kothari A, et al. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review. Implement Sci 2016;11:38.
3. Wells KJ, Lima DS, Meade CD, et al. Assessing needs and assets for building a regional network infrastructure to reduce cancer related health disparities. Eval Program Plann 2014;44:14-25.
4. Stop HIV/AIDS. Stop HIV/AIDS-Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV/AIDS.2015,http://stophivaids.ca/ (accessed 12 Feb 2016).
5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Guide to Knowledge Translation Planning at CIHR: Integrated and end-of-Grant Approaches. 2015. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/ 45321.html (accessed 12 Feb 2016).
6. Viswanathan M, Lux L, Lohr KN, et al. Translating evidence-based interventions into practice: the design and development of the Merck Childhood Asthma Network Inc. (MCAN). Health Promot Pract 2011;12(Suppl 1):9S-19S.
7. Villarruel AM, Gal TL, Eakin BL, et al. From research to practice: the importance of community collaboration in the translation process. Res Theory Nurs Pract 2010;24:25-34.
8. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, et al. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications, 1994.
9. Van de Ven A, Johnson P. Knowledge for theory and practice. Aacad Manag Rev 2006;31:802-21.
10. Greenhalgh T, Fahy N. Research impact in the community-based health sciences: an analysis of 162 case studies from the 2014 UK Research of Excellence Framework. BMC Med 2015;13:232.
11. Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, et al. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disabil Rehabil 2015;37:1390-400.
12. Kitson A, Powell K, Hoon E, et al. Knowledge translation within a population health study: How do you do it? Implement Sci 2013;8:54.
13. Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 14: organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst 2009;7(Suppl 1):S14.
14. Boyko JA, Lavis JN, Abelson J, et al. Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making. Soc Sci Med 2012;75:1938-45.
15. Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Gauvin FP. Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1287.
16. Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, et al. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. 2013. http://gdt.guidelinedevelopment.org/app/handbook/handbook.html.
17. World Health Organization. HO Handbook for Guideline Development. Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75146/1/ 9789241548441_eng.pdf (accessed 12 Feb 2016).
18. Alexander P, Gionfriddo M, Li S, et al. A number of factors explain why WHO guideline developers make strong recommendations inconsistent with GRADE guidance. Clin Epidemiol 2016;70:111-22.
19. McKellar KA, Pitzul KB, Juliana JY, et al. Evaluating communities of practice and knowledge networks: a systematic scoping review of evaluation frameworks. Ecohealth 2014;11:383-99.
20. Allender S, Nichols M, Foulkes C, et al. The development of a network for community-based obesity prevention: the CO_OPS Collaboration. BMC Public Health 2011;11:132.
21. Wathen CN, MacGregor JC, Hammerton J, et al. Priorities for research in child maltreat, intimate partner violence and resilience to violence exposure: results of an international Delphi consensus development process. BMC Public Health 2012;12:684.
22. Kothari A, Sibbald S, Wathen C. Evaluation of partnerships in a transnational family violence research network using an integrated knowledge translation and exchange model: a mixed methods study. Health Res Policy Syst 2014;12:25.
23. Trochim WM. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann 1989;12:1-16.
24. Burke JG, O'Campo P, Peak GL, et al. An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1392-410.
25. Luke DA, Harris JK. Network analysis in public health: history, methods and application. Annu Rev Public Health 2007;28:69-93.
26. Milward H, Provan K. Measuring network structure. Public Adm 1998;76:387-407.
27. Valente TW. Network interventions. Science 2012;337:49-53.
28. Kothari A, Hamel N, MacDonald J, et al. Exploring community collaborations: social network analysis as a reflective tool for public health. Syst Pract Action Res 2014;27:123-37.
29. Greenhalgh T, Hurwitz B. Narrative based medicine: why study narrative? BMJ 1999;318:48-50.
30. McCormack B, Kitson A, Harvey G, et al. Getting evidence into practice: the meaning of context. J Adv Nurs 2002;38:94-104.
31. Contandriopoulos D, Lemire M, Denis JL, et al. Knowledge exchange process in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative. Milbank Q 2010;88:444-83.
32. Browne AJ, Varcoe CM, Ford-Gilboe M, et al. EQUIP Healthcare: An overview of a multi-component intervention to enhance equity-oriented care in primary health care settings. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2015;14:152.
33. Garinger C. The clinic narrative: a multiple case study of integrated knowledge translation and equity-oriented primary health care. The University of Western Ontario, 2014. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/2305 (accessed 15 Feb 2016).
34. Equip Healthcare. EQUIP Healthcare: Research to Equip Primary Healthcare for Equity. http://equiphealthcare.ca/reports-resources/community-context-profiles/ (accessed 15 Feb 2016).
35. Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P. Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. J Health Serv Res 2003;8:94-9.
36. Wathen CN, MacMillan HL. The role of integrated knowledge translation in intervention research. Prev Sci. Published Online First: 13 May 2015. doi:10.1007/ s11121-015-0564-9.
37. Wathen CN, Macgregor JC, Sibbald SL, et al. Exploring the uptake and framing of research evidence on universal screening for partner violence against women: a knowledge translation case study. Health Res Policy Syst 2013;11:13.
38. Greenhalgh T, Wieringa S. Is it time to drop the "knowledge translation" metaphor? A critical literature review. J R Soc Med 2011;104:501-9.