Recovery of genetic diversity levels of a Neotropical tree in Atlantic Forest restoration plantations

Biological Conservation

Volumn 211, Issue , 2017, Pages 110-116

  Sujii, Patricia Sanae ^a   Schwarcz, Kaiser Dias ^a   Grando, Carolina ^a   de Aguiar Silvestre, Ellida ^a   Mori, Gustavo Maruyama ^b,c   Brancalion, Pedro H S ^d   Zucchi, Maria Imaculada ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b AGÊNCIA PAULISTA DE TECNOLOGIA DOS AGRONEGÓCIOS   (Brazil)

^c SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Atlantic Forest; Centrolobium tomenstosum; Effective population size; Inbreeding; Population genetics

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; DECIDUOUS TREE; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; NEOTROPICAL KINGDOM; PLANTATION FORESTRY; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; PROTECTED AREA; RECOVERY PLAN; REINTRODUCTION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ATLANTIC FOREST; BRAZIL;

CENTROLOBIUM;

EID: 85019177233     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aguilar, R., Quesada, M., Ashworth, L., Herrerias-Diego, Y., Lobo, J., Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol. Ecol. 17:24 (2008), 5177–5188.
2. Aidar, M.P.M., Ecologia do araribá (Centrolobium tomentosum Guill. ex Benth - Fabaceae) e o ecótono mata ciliar da bacia do rio Jacaré-Pepira, São Paulo. (MS Dissertation), 1992, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.
3. Aidar, M.P.M., Joly, C.A., Dinâmica da produção e decomposição da serapilheira do araribá (Centrolobium tomentosum Guill. ex Benth. – Fabaceae) em uma mata ciliar, Rio Jacaré-Pepira, São Paulo. Rev. Bras. Bot. 26:2 (2003), 193–202.
4. Angeloni, F., Ouborg, N.J., Leimu, R., Meta-analysis on the association of population size and life history with inbreeding depression in plants. Biol. Conserv. 144 (2011), 35–43.
5. ST-outlier method. BMC Bioinf., 9, 2008, 323.
6. Bawa, K.S., Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1990, 399–422.
7. Brancalion, P.H.S., Holl, K.D., Functional composition trajectory: a resolution to the debate between Suganuma, Durigan, and Reid. Restor. Ecol. 24 (2016), 1–3.
8. Brancalion, P.H.S., Viani, R.A.G., Aronson, J. et al., Improving planting stocks for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest restoration through community-based seed harvesting strategies. Restor. Ecol. 20 (2012), 704–711.
9. Brancalion, P.H., Cardozo, I.V., Camatta, A. et al., Cultural ecosystem services and popular perceptions of the benefits of an ecological restoration project in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Restor. Ecol. 22:1 (2014), 65–71.
10. Carvalho, P.E.R., Araruva. Embrapa Circular Técnica, 2005, 103 (Colombo).
11. Cavallari, M.M., Siqueira, M.V., Val, T.M. et al., A modified acidic approach for DNA extraction from plant species containing high levels of secondary metabolites. Genet. Mol. Res. 13:3 (2014), 6497–6502.
12. Charlesworth, D., Willis, J.H., The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10:11 (2009), 783–796.
13. Chazdon, R.L., Brancalion, P.H., Lamb, D. et al., A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett., 2015, 10.1111/conl.12220.
14. Cockerham, C.C., Variance of gene frequencies. Evolution, 1969, 72–84.
15. Dixon, K.W., Pollination and restoration. Science, 325(5940), 2009, 571.
16. Durigan, G., Franco, G.A.D.C., Saito, M. et al., Estrutura e diversidade do componente arbóreo da floresta na Estação Ecológica dos Caetetus, Gália, SP. Rev. Bras. Bot. 23 (2000), 371–383.
17. Ellstrand, N.C., Elam, D.R., Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24 (1993), 217–242.
18. Farah, F.T., Rodrigues, R.R., Santos, F.A.M. et al., Forest destructuring as revealed by the temporal dynamics of fundamental species–case study of Santa Genebra Forest in Brazil. Ecol. Indic. 37 (2014), 40–44.
19. Foll, M., Gaggiotti, O., A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180:2 (2008), 977–993.
20. Frankham, R., Bradshaw, C.J., Brook, B.W., Genetics in conservation management: revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol. Conserv. 170 (2014), 56–63.
21. Greene, D.F., Johnson, E.A., Seed mass and dispersal capacity in wind-dispersed diaspores. Oikos, 1993, 69–74.
22. Hardy, O.J., Vekemans, X., SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2 (2002), 618–620.
23. Hartl, D.L., Clark, A.G., Princípios de genética de populações. 2010, Artmed, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul.
24. Holl, K.D., Restoring tropical forests from the bottom up. Science 394:355 (2017), 455–456.
25. Honnay, O., Jacquemyn, H., Susceptibility of common and rare plant species to the genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation. Conserv. Biol. 21:3 (2007), 823–831.
26. Janishevski, L., Santamaria, C., Gidda, S.B. et al., Ecosystem restoration, protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Unasylva 245 (2015), 19–28.
27. Kaiser-Bunbury, C.N., Mougal, J., Whittington, A.E. et al., Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function. Nature 542:7640 (2017), 223–227.
28. Keenan, K., McGinnity, P., Cross, T.F. et al., Diversity: an R package for the estimation of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4 (2013), 782–788.
29. Lesica, P., Allendorf, F.W., Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: mix or match?. Restor. Ecol. 7:1 (1999), 42–50.
30. Loiselle, B.A., Sork, V.L., Nason, J., Graham, C., Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am. J. Bot., 1995, 1420–1425.
31. Lowe, A.J., Boshier, D., Ward, M., Bacles, C.F., Navarro, C., Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 95:4 (2005), 255–273.
32. Lowe, A.J., Cavers, S., Boshier, D. et al., The resilience of forest fragmentation genetics—no longer a paradox—we were just looking in the wrong place. Heredity 115:2 (2015), 97–99.
33. Melo, F.P., Pinto, S.R., Brancalion, P.H. et al., Priority setting for scaling-up tropical forest restoration projects: early lessons from the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact. Environ. Sci. Pol. 33 (2013), 395–404.
34. Mijangos, J.L., Pacioni, C., Spencer, P., Craig, M.D., Contribution of genetics to ecological restoration. Mol. Ecol. 24:1 (2015), 22–37.
35. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G. et al., Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:6772 (2000), 853–858.
36. Neto, O.C., Aguiar, A.V., Twyford, A.D. et al., Genetic and ecological outcomes of Inga vera Subspaffinis (Leguminosae) tree plantations in a fragmented tropical landscape. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e99903.
37. Nogueira, J.C.B., Reflorestamento heterogêneo em essências indígenas. 1977, Instituto Florestal, São Paulo, São Paulo.
38. Oosterhout, V.C., Hutchinson, W.F., Wills, D.P.M., Shipley, P., PROGRAM NOTE MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4 (2004), 535–538.
39. Pagano, M.C., Rhizobia associated with neotropical tree Centrolobium tomentosum used in riparian restoration. Plant Soil Environ. 54 (2008), 498–508.
40. Paquette, S.R., PopGenKit: Useful Functions for (Batch) File Conversion and Data Resampling in Microsatellite Datasets. R package version 1.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PopGenKit, 2012.
41. Pautasso, M., Geographical genetics and the conservation of forest trees. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 11:3 (2009), 157–189.
42. Pinheiro, F., Cozzolino, S., Barros, F., Gouveia, T.M. et al., Phylogeographic structure and outbreeding depression reveal early stages of reproductive isolation in the Neotropical orchid Epidendrum denticulatum. Evolution 67:7 (2013), 2024–2039.
43. R Core Team, R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2015, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (URL) http://www.R-project.org.
44. Raposo, A., Martins, K., Ciampi, A.Y. et al., Diversidade genética de populações de andiroba no Baixo Acre. Pesq. Agrop. Brasileira 42:9 (2007), 1291–1298.
45. Reed, D.H., Frankham, R., Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 17 (2003), 230–237.
46. Ribeiro, M.C., Metzger, J.P., Martensen, A.C. et al., The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 142:6 (2009), 1141–1153.
47. Ritchie, A.L., Krauss, S.L., A genetic assessment of ecological restoration success in Banksia attenuata. Restor. Ecol. 20:4 (2012), 441–449.
48. Rodrigáñez, J., Barragán, C., Alves, E. et al., Genetic diversity and allelic richness in Spanish wild and domestic pig population estimated from microsatellite markers. Span. J. Agric. Res. 6 (2008), 107–115.
49. Rodrigues, N.B., Variabilidade genética de populações de Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart. ex Hayne e Dipteryx alata Vogel em áreas nativas e em plantios de recuperação de áreas degradadas em Paracatu, MG. MS Dissertation. 2013, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.
50. Rodrigues, R.R., Leitão Filho, H.D.F., Crestana, M.S.M., Revegetação do entorno da represa de abastecimento de água do município de Iracemápolis, SP. Simpósio sobre recuperação de áreas degradadas - Anais, Curitiba, Paraná, 1992.
51. Rodrigues, R.R., Lima, R.A.F., Gandolfi, S., Nave, A.G., On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experiences in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol. Conserv. 142 (2009), 1242–1251.
52. Ruiz-Jaen, M.C., Mitchell Aide, T., Restoration success: how is it being measured?. Restor. Ecol. 13:3 (2005), 569–577.
53. Salas-Leiva, D.E., Mayor-Durán, V.M., Toro-Perea, N., Genetic diversity of black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) in natural and reforested areas of Salamanca Island Parkway, Colombian Caribbean. Hydrobiologia 620:1 (2009), 17–24.
54. Schweizer, D., Machado, R., Durigan, G., Brancalion, P.H.S., Phylogenetic patterns of Atlantic forest restoration communities are mainly driven by stochastic, dispersal related factors. For. Ecol. Manag. 354 (2015), 300–308.
55. Scopece, G., Lexer, C., Widmer, A., Cozzolino, S., Polymorphism of postmating reproductive isolation within plant species. Taxon 59:5 (2010), 1367–1374.
56. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Atlas das unidades de conservação ambiental do Estado de São Paulo. Parte II: Interior. Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente, 1998, Metalivros, São Paulo.
57. Shoo, L.P., Freebody, K., Kanowski, J., Catterall, C.P., Slow recovery of tropical old-field rainforest regrowth and the value and limitations of active restoration. Conserv. Biol. 30:1 (2016), 121–132.
58. Smulders, M.J., Cottrell, J.E., Lefèvre, F. et al., Structure of the genetic diversity in black poplar (Populus nigra L.) populations across European river systems: consequences for conservation and restoration. For. Ecol. Manag. 255:5 (2008), 1388–1399.
59. Suding, K., Higgs, E., Palmer, M. et al., Committing to ecological restoration. Science 8 (2015), 638–640.
60. Suganuma, M.S., Durigan, G., Indicators of restoration success in riparian tropical forests using multiple reference ecosystems. Restor. Ecol. 23:3 (2015), 238–251.
61. Sujii, P.S., Schwarcz, K.D., Grando, C. et al., Isolation and characterisation of microsatellite markers for Centrolobium tomentosum (Fabaceae), a neotropical tree species widely used for Atlantic Rainforest restoration. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 7:3 (2015), 733–734.
62. Sezen, U.U., Chazdon, R.L., Holsinger, K.E., Multigenerational genetic analysis of tropical secondary regeneration in a canopy palm. Ecology 88:12 (2007), 3065–3075.
63. Sujii et al., High gene flow through pollen partially compensate spatial limited seed dispersal in a Neotropical tree. 2017 in prep to Journal of Heredity (unpublished data).
64. Szpiech, Z.A., Jakobsson, M., Rosenberg, N.A., ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations. Bioinformatics 24:21 (2008), 2498–2504.
65. Thomas, E., Jalonen, R., Loo, J. et al., Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. For. Ecol. Manag. 333 (2014), 66–75.
66. Vencovsky, R., Crossa, J., Measurements of representativeness used in genetic resources conservation and plant breeding. Crop Sci. 43:6 (2003), 1912–1921.
67. Vranckx, G.U., Jacquemyn, H., Muys, B., Honnay, O., Meta-analysis of susceptibility of woody plants to loss of genetic diversity through habitat fragmentation. Conserv. Biol. 26:2 (2012), 228–237.
68. Weising, K., Gardner, R.C., A set of conserved PCR primers for the analysis of simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in chloroplast genomes of dicotyledonous angiosperms. Genome 42 (1999), 9–19.
69. Weir, B.S., Cockerham, C.C., Estimating F statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:6 (1984), 1358–1370.
70. Wortley, L., Hero, J.M., Howes, M., Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restor. Ecol. 21:5 (2013), 537–543.
71. WRI, World Resources Institute Initiative 20x20. Available at: www.wri.org/our-work/project/initiative-20x20, 2016.
72. Zucchi et al., Restoring genetic diversity in a threatened ecosystem. 2017 submitted to Restoration Ecology (unpublished data).