LCA data quality: A management science perspective

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 156, Issue , 2017, Pages 888-898

  Bicalho, Tereza ^a   Sauer, Ildo ^a   Rambaud, Alexandre ^b   Altukhova, Yulia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE REIMS CHAMPAGNE ARDENNE   (France)

Author keywords

Data quality; Environmental accounting; LCA; Management tools

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; LIFE CYCLE; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; QUALITY CONTROL;

DATA COLLECTION PROCESS; DATA QUALITY; DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTINGS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); MANAGEMENT AND CONTROLS; MANAGEMENT TOOL; SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCES;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85019077065     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.229     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Agrianual, Anuário Estatístico da Agricultura Brasileira. 2010, FNP Consultoria & Comércio, São Paulo.
2. Allard-Poesi, F., Maréchal, G., Construction de l'objet de la recherche. Thiétart, R.-A., (eds.) Méthodes de recherche en Management, third ed., 2007, Dunod, Paris, 34–57.
3. Antheauame, N., Christophe, B., La comptabilité environnementale. Des outils pour évaluer la performance écologique. 2005, E-theque.com.
4. Berry, M., Une technologie invisible? L'impact des instruments de gestion sur l’évolution des systèmes humains. 1983, Centre de Recherche en Gestion, Ecole Polytechnique.
5. Bicalho, T., Les limites de l'ACV – Etude de la soutenabilité d'un biodiesel issu d'huile de palme. (Thèse de Doctorat), 2013, Université Paris Dauphine.
6. Bicalho, T., Richard, J., Bessou, C., Limitations of LCA in environmental accounting for biofuels under RED. Sustainability Accounting. Manag. Policy J. 3:2 (2012), 218–234.
7. Burritt, R., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting – links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Aust. Account. Rev. 12:27 (2002), 39–50.
8. César, A.S., Batalha, M.O., Brazilian biodiesel: the case of the palm's social projects. Energy Policy 56 (2013), 165–174.
9. Chomkhamsri, K., Wolf, M.-A., Pant, R., International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook: review schemes for life cycle assessment. Finkbeiner, M., (eds.) Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management, 2011, Springer, Dordrecht, 107–117.
10. Choo, Y.M., Muhamad, H., Hashim, Z., Subramaniam, V., Puah, C.W., Tan, Y.A., Determination of GHG contributions by subsystems in the oil palm supply chain using the LCA approach. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16 (2011), 669–681.
11. Christophe, B., Les informations écologiques de la comptabilité financière traditionnelle. Rev. Française Comptab. 272 (1995), 86–91.
12. Corley, R.H.V., Tinker, P.B., The Oil Palm. fourth ed., 2003, World agricultural series, Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.
13. David, A., L'aide à la décision. Entre outils et organisations. Entrep. Histoire 13 (1996), 9–26.
14. David, A., Structure et dynamique des innovations managériales. 5ème Conférence de l'AIMS, 13–15 Mai, Lille, 1996.
15. David, A., Models implementation: a state of the art. Actes de EURO Conference, 12–16 July, Brussels, 1998.
16. David, A., Logique épistémologique et des sciences de gestion: trois hypothèses revisitées. David, A., Hatchuel, A., Laufer, R., (eds.) Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion, 2001, Vuibert, Paris, 83–109.
17. David, A., La recherche intervention, un cadre général pour la recherche en Management?. David, A., Hatchuel, A., Laufer, R., (eds.) Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion, 2001, Vuibert, Paris, 193–213.
18. De Vaujany, F.X., Réflexion sur la place de la perspective appropriative au sein des sciences de gestion. De Vaujany, F.X., (eds.) De la conception à l'usage. Vers un management de l'appropriation des outils de gestion, 2005, Management & Sociétés, Caen, 225–234.
19. Edwards, R., Larive, J.-F., Beziat, J.-C., Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Power Trains in the European Context, Version 3c. 2011, Joint Research Centre.
20. Eun, J.H., Son, J.H., Moon, J.M., et Chung, J.S., Integration of life cycle assessment in the environmental information system. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 14:4 (2009), 364–373.
21. European Commission, Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union, L 140 (2009), 16–62 5.6.2009.
22. European Commission, Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products. Off. J. Eur. Union, L 285 (2009), 10–35 31.10.2009.
23. European Commission, Directive 2010/30/EU of 19 May 2010 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products. Off. J. Eur. Union, L 153 (2010), 1–12 18.6.2010.
24. European Commission, International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook – General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment – Detailed Guidance. first ed., 2010, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Luxembourg, 394 March 2010.
25. European Commission, Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide, Deliverable 2 and 4A of the Administrative Arrangement between DG Environment and the Joint Research Centre N° N070307/2009/552517, Including Amendment N°1 from December 2010, Consolidated Version, Ispra. 2012 July, 17, 2012.
26. Finnveden, G., On the limitations of life cycle assessment and environmental systems analysis tools in general. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 5:4 (2000), 229–238.
27. Gale, R., Environmental management accounting as a reflexive modernization strategy in cleaner production. J. Clean. Prod. 14:4 (2006), 1228–1236.
28. Glaserfeld, V.E., The radical constructivist view of science. Foundations of science. Special issue impact Radic. Constr. Sci. 6:1 (2001), 31–43.
29. Grahl, B., Shmincke, E., “Critical review” and “verification” cannot be used synonymously – a plea for a differentiated and precise use of the terms. Proceedings of the Lyfe Cycle Management (LCM) Conference 2011, Berlin, Germany, 2012.
30. Gray, R., Bebbington, J., Accounting for the Environment. second ed., 2001, Sage, London.
31. Grimand, A., Introduction: L'appropriation des outils de gestion, entre rationalité instrumentale et construction du sens. Grimand, A., (eds.) L'appropriation des outils de gestion. Vers de nouvelles perspectives théoriques?, 2006, Publication de l'Université Saint-Etienne, 13–27.
32. Guinée, J.B., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., De Koning, A., Van Oers, L., Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Suh, S., Udo de Haes, H.A., De Bruijn, J.A., Van Duin, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment. Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
33. Hatchuel, A., Frédéric Taylor: une lecture épistémologique. L'expert, le théoricien, le doctrinaire. Bouilloud, J.P., Lécuyer, B.P., (eds.) L'invention de la gestion: histoire et pratiques, 1994, L'Harmattan, Paris, 53–64.
34. Hatchuel, A., David, A., From action research to intervention research in management. Shani, A., Mohrman, S., Pasmore, W., Stymne, B., Adler, N., (eds.) Handbook of Collaborative Management Research, 2008, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 143–162.
35. ISO, ISO 9000 Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary. 2005, International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva.
36. ISO, ISO 14044 Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines. 2006, International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva.
37. ISO, ISO 14040 Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. 2006, International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva.
38. Jasch, C., How to perform an environmental cost assessment in one day. J. Clean. Prod. 14:14 (2006), 1194–1213.
39. Landry, M., Banville, C., Oral, M., Model legitimization in operational research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 92 (1996), 443–453.
40. Leroy, Y., Développement d'une méthodologie de fiabilisation des prises de décisions environnementales dans le cadre d'analyses de cycle de vie basée sur l'analyse et la gestion des incertitudes sur les données d'inventaires. (Thèse de doctorat), 2009, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Institut de Chambéry.
41. Léssard-Hébert, M., Goyette, G., Boutin, G., La recherche qualitative. Fondement et pratiques. 1997, Montréal, Editions Nouvelles AMS, Montréal.
42. Lorino, P., 2002. Vers une théorie pragmatique des outils appliqué aux instruments de gestion. ESSEC, Working paper, DR-02015.
43. Moisdon, J.C., Du mode d'existence des outils de gestion. Les instruments de gestion à l’épreuve de l'organisation. 1997, Seli Arslan, Paris.
44. Perret, V., Seville, M., Fondements épistémologiques de la recherche. Thiétart, R.-A., (eds.) Méthodes de recherche en Management, third ed., 2007, Dunod, Paris, 13–33.
45. Richard, J., Comptabilités environnementales. Colasse, B., (eds.) Encyclopédie de comptabilité, contrôle, audit, 2009, Economica, Paris, 490–494.
46. Richard, J., Comptabilité et développement durable. 2012, Economica, Paris.
47. Schaltegger, S., Economics of life cycle assessment: inefficiency of the present approach. Bus. Strategy Environ. 6 (1997), 1–8.
48. Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concepts and Practice. 2000, Greenleaf, Sheffield.
49. Schaltegger, S., Csutora, M., Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 36 (2012), 1–16.
50. Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., Zvezdov, D., Hörisch, J., Tingey-Helyoak, J., Management roles and sustainability information. Exploring corporate practive. Aust. Account. Rev. 75:25 (2015), 328–345.
51. Schmidt, J.H., Life Cycle Inventory of Rapeseed Oil and Palm Oil. (Ph.D. thesis), 2007, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University.
52. Simon, H., Sciences des systèmes, Sciences de l'artificiel. 1991, Dunod-Bordas, Paris.
53. Stechemesser, K., Guenther, E., Carbon accounting: a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 36 (2012), 17–38.
54. UNEP, Global Guidance Principles for Life Cycle Assessment Databases. A Basis for Greener Processes and Products. 2011, United Nations Environmental Programme, Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, Paris.
55. UNEP, Guidance on Organizational Life Cycle Assessment. 2015, United Nations Environmental Programme, Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, Paris.
56. Usunier, J.-C., Easterby, S.M., Thorpe, R., Introduction à la recherche en gestion. second ed., 2007, Economica, Paris.
57. De Vaujany, F.-X., Pour une théorie de l'appropriation des outils de gestion: vers un dépassement de l'opposition conception-usage. Manag. Avenir 3:9 (2006), 109–126.
58. Wacheux, F., Méthodes qualitatives et recherche en gestion. 1996, Economica, Paris.
59. WBCSD, Generating Value from External Assurance of Sustainability Reporting. 2016, Wolrld Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva.
60. Weidema, B.P., Wesnaes, M.S., Data quality management for life cycle inventories – an example of using data quality indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 4:3 (1996), 167–174.
61. Weidema, B.P., Bauer, C., Hischier, R., Mutel, C., Nemecek, T., Vadenbo, C.O., Wernet, G., Overview and Methodology. Dataquality Guideline for the Ecoinvent Database Version 3. Ecoinvent Report, 2013, The Ecoinvent Centre, St Gallen.
62. Zimmermann, P., Frischknecht, R., Ménard, M., Background inventory data. Schaltegger, S., (eds.) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) – Quo Vadis?, 1996, Birkäuser Verlag, 39–49.