Launch and iterate: Reducing prediction churn

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 3179-3187

  Cormier, Q ^a   Milani Fard, M ^b   Canini, K ^b   Gupta, M R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b GOOGLE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; ITERATIVE METHODS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; STABILIZATION;

BENCHMARK DATASETS; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE-CARLO; STABILIZATION OPERATORS; TRAINING EXAMPLE;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 85018868078     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. L. Devroye and T. Wagner. Distribution-free performance bounds for potential function rules. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 25(5): 601-604, 1979.
2. V. N. Vapnik. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1995.
3. V. N. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley: New York, 1998.
4. O. Bousquet and A. Elisseeff. Algorithmic stability and generalization performance. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13: Proceedings of the 2000 Conference, Volume 13, page 196. MIT Press, 2001.
5. O. Bousquet and A. Elisseeff. Stability and generalization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2(Mar): 499-526, 2002.
6. S. Mukherjee, P. Niyogi, T. Poggio, and R. Rifkin. Learning theory: stability is sufficient for generalization and necessary and sufficient for consistency of empirical risk minimization. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 25(1-3): 161-193, 2006.
7. A. Reinart. Statistics Done Wrong: The Woefully Complete Guide. No Starch Press, San Francisco, USA, 2015.
8. N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1): 1929-1958, 2014.
9. L. Zhang and P. N. Suganthan. A survey of randomized algorithms for training neural networks. Information Sciences, 2016.
10. J. Platt. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, 10(3): 61-74, 1999.
11. A. Niculescu-Mizil and R. Caruana. Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 625-632. ACM, 2005.
12. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12: 2825-2830, 2011.
13. L. Candillier and V. Lemaire. Design and analysis of the Nomao challenge active learning in the real-world. In Proceedings of the ALRA: Active Learning in Real-world Applications, Workshop ECML-PKDD, 2012.
14. K. Fernandes, P. Vinagre, and P. Cortez. Progress in Artificial Intelligence: 17th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, EPIA 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-11, 2015. Proceedings, chapter A Proactive Intelligent Decision Support System for Predicting the Popularity of Online News, pages 535-546. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015.
15. F. Kawala, E. Gaussier, A. Douzal-Chouakria, and E. Diemert. Apprentissage d'ordonnancement et influence de l'ambiguïté pour la prédiction d'activité sur les réseaux sociaux. In Coria'2014, pages 1-15, Nancy, France, France, March 2014.