The science education initiative: An experiment in scaling up educational improvements in a research university

Transforming Institutions: Undergraduate STEM Education for the 21st Century

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 125-139

  Chasteen, Stephanie V ^a   Perkins, Katherine K ^a   Code, Warren J ^b   Wieman, Carl E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018809965     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220-252. doi: 10.1002/jee.20040
2. Chasteen, S. V., Perkins, K. K., Beale, P. D., Pollock, S. J., & Wieman, C. E. (2011). A thoughtful approach to instruction: Course transformation for the rest of us. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(4), 70-76.
3. Chasteen, S. V., & Perkins, K. P. (2014). Change from within: The Science Education Initiative. In M.A. McDaniel, R. F. Frey, S. M. Fitzpatrick and H.L. Roediger, (Eds), Integrating cognitive science with innovative teaching in STEM disciplines (e-reader version), 298-370. St. Louis: Washington University in St. Louis Libraries.
4. Chasteen, S. V., Wilcox, B., Caballero, M. D., Perkins, K. K., Pollock, S. J., & Wieman, C. E. (in press). Educational transformation in upper-level physics: The Science Education Initiative model, outcomes, and lessons learned. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
5. Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2008). Barriers and promises in STEM reform. Washington, D.C.: National Academies of Science.
6. Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2010). Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty. American Journal of Physics, 78(10), 1056-1063.
7. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952-984. doi: 10.1002/tea.20439
8. Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). Use of researchbased instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(2). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020104
9. Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2014). The Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative in the Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, University of British Columbia. (Unpublished benchmark case study, Bay View Alliance).
10. Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change (1 edition.). Boston, Mass: Harvard Business Review Press.
11. Pentland, A. (2014). Social physics: How good ideas spread-The lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin Press HC.
12. Wieman, C., Deslauriers, L., & Gilley, B. (2013). Use of research-based instructional strategies: How to avoid faculty quitting. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9(2), 023102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.023102
13. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (expanded 2nd ed.) Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.