Participatory governance in smart cities: The urbanAPI case study

International Journal of Services, Technology and Management

Volumn 23, Issue 5-6, 2017, Pages 419-444

  Soomro, Kamran ^a   Khan, Zaheer ^a   Ludlow, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Co production; Participatory governance; Smart cities

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; LAND USE; PLANNING; SMART CITY; URBAN GROWTH;

CO-PRODUCTION; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DISTRIBUTION AND MOBILITY; PARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; SPATIAL PLANNING; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GOVERNANCE;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 85018755557     PISSN: 14606720     EISSN: 1741525X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJSTM.2017.10009859     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agarwal, N. (2015) Liferay Portal 6.2 Enterprise Intranets, Packt Publishing, Birmingham, UK.
2. Albrechts, L. et al. (2010) ‘More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead?’, Environment and Planning: B, Planning and Design, Vol. 37, No. 6, p.1115.
3. Al-Kodmany, K. (2002) ‘Visualization tools and methods in community planning: from freehand sketches to virtual reality’, Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp.189–211.
4. Arnstein, S.R. (1969) ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp.216–224.
5. Boyd, S. and Chan, R. (2002) Placemaking Tools for Community Action, Concern, Inc., Environmental Simulation Center, US Department of Energy, Denver.
6. Chua, B.B. and Dyson, L.E. (2004) ‘Applying the ISO 9126 model to the evaluation of an e-learning system’, Proc. of ASCILITE, pp.5–8.
7. City Council of Vitoria-Gasteiz (2012) The Interior Green Belt. Towards an Urban Green Infrastructure in Vitoria-Gasteiz [online] http://www.vitoriagasteiz.org/wb021/http/contenidosEstaticos/adjuntos/es/44411.pdf (accessed 17 September 2016).
8. Doyle, S., Dodge, M. and Smith, A. (1998) ‘The potential of web-based mapping and virtual reality technologies for modelling urban environments’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp.137–155.
9. ESPAS (2013) The Global Economy in 2030: Trends and Strategies for Europe [online] http://europa.eu/espas/pdf/espas-report-economy.pdf (accessed 6 November 2015).
10. Fung, A. (2015) ‘Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp.513–522.
11. Hanzl, M. (2007) ‘Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: a review of experiments and potentials’, Design Studies, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.289–307.
12. Jacquier, C. (2005) ‘On relationships between integrated policies for sustainable urban development and urban governance’, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp.363–376.
13. Janssen, M. and Zuiderwijk, A. (2012) ‘Open data and transformational government’, TGov Conference, London.
14. Kahila, M. and Kyttä, M. (2009) ‘SoftGIS as a bridge-builder in collaborative urban planning’, Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods, pp.389–411, Springer.
15. Khan, Z. and Ludlow, D. et al. (2014a) ‘ICT enabled participatory urban planning and policy development’, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.205–229.
16. Khan, Z. et al. (2015) ‘Towards cloud based big data analytics for smart future cities’, Journal of Cloud Computing, Vol. 4, No. 1, p.2.
17. Khan, Z., Kiani, S. and Soomro, K. (2014b) ‘A framework for cloud-based context-aware information services for citizens in smart cities’, Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 1, p.14.
18. Khan, Z., Ludlow, D. and Caceres, S. (2013a) ‘Evaluating a collaborative IT based research and development project’, Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 40, pp.27–41.
19. Khan, Z., Ludlow, D. and Loibl, W. (2013b) ‘Applying the CoRes requirements development method for building it tools for urban management systems: the Urbanapi project’, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp.25–59.
20. Kyttä, M. (2011) ‘The inhabitant friendly, health promoting urban structure’, Guest Editor, p.72.
21. Lang, V. and Sittler, P. (2012) ‘Augmented reality for real estate’, 18th Pacific-RIM Real Estate Society (PRRES) Conference, Research paper, Adelaide, Australia.
22. Lew, P., Olsina, L. and Zhang, L. (2010) ‘Web engineering’, in Benatallah, B. et al. (Eds.): 10th International Conference, ICWE 2010, Vienna Austria, 5–9 July 2010, pp.218–232, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
23. Liberatore, A. and Funtowicz, S. (2003) ‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy: what does this mean, and why bother?’, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp.146–150.
24. Linders, D. (2012) ‘From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media’, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp.446–454.
25. Loibl, W. and Peters-Anders, J. (2012) ‘Mobile phone data as source to discover spatial activity and motion patterns’, G1_Forum, pp.524–533.
26. Manoharan, T., Taylor, H. and Gardiner, P. (2002) ‘A collaborative analysis tool for visualisation and interaction with spatial data’, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on 3D Web Technology: Web3D’02, pp.75–83, ACM, New York, NY, USA.
27. Moulaert, F. et al. (2007) ‘Introduction: social innovation and governance in european cities: urban development between path dependency and radical innovation’, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.195–209.
28. Parycek, P. and Sachs, M. (2010) ‘Open government – information flow in Web 2.0’, European Journal of ePractice, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.1–70.
29. Peters-Anders, J. et al. (2014) ‘Exploring population distribution and motion dynamics through mobile phone device data in selected cities – lessons learned from the urbanAPI project’, 19th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society – REAL CORP 2014, pp.871–876, REAL CORP 2014 Tagungsband, Vienna.
30. Sarkan, H.M., Ahmad, T.P.S. and Bakar, A.A. (2011) ‘Using JIRA and Redmine in requirement development for agile methodology’, 2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering, pp.408–413, IEEE.
31. Stellingwerff, M. and Kuhk, A. (2004) ‘3D/4D communication tools for facilitators in public participation’, Architecture in the Network Society: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design, pp.15–18, Copenhagen.
32. The Open Government Working Group (2012) Open Government Data [online] http://opengovernmentdata.org/ (accessed 30 November 2015).
33. UVM Systems (2013) CityGrid [online] http://www.uvmsystems.com/index.php/en/ (accessed 1 April 2016).
34. Wampler, B. and McNulty, S.L. (n.d.) Does Participatory Governance Matter? [online] http://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/does-participatory-governance-matter (accessed 30 November 2015).
35. Weber, E.P. and Khademian, A.M. (2008) ‘Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp.334–349.
36. Weerakkody, V. and Dhillon, G. (2008) ‘Moving from e-government to t-government: a study of process reengineering challenges in a UK local authority context’, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp.1–16.
37. Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M. and Dwivedi, Y.K. (2011) ‘Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): lessons from the British and Dutch public sector’, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.320–328.