A minimal prototype for integrating GIS and geographic simulation through geographic automata systems

GeoDynamics

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 347-367

  Benenson, Itzhak ^a   Torrens, Paul M ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018500148     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Albin, P. S. 1975. The Analysis of Complex Socioeconomic Systems. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
2. Batty, M., H. Couclelis, and M. Eichen. 1997. Special issue: urban systems as cellular automata. Environment and Planning B 24(2).
3. Benenson, I. 1998. Multi-agent simulations of residential dynamics in the city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 22:25-42.
4. Benenson, I. 1999. Modelling population dynamics in the city: from a regional to a multi-agent approach. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 3:149-170.
5. Benenson, I. and I. Omer. 2000. Multi-scale approach to measuring residential segregation and the case of Yaffo, Tel-Aviv. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on GeoComputation, edited by R. Abrahart. Manchester: GeoComputation CD-ROM.
6. Benenson, I. and I. Omer. 2003. High-resolution Census data: a simple way to make them useful. Data Science Journal (Spatial Data Usability Special Section) 2:117-127.
7. Benenson, I. and P. M. Torrens. 2004a. Geosimulation: Automata-Based Modeling of Urban Phenomena. London: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Benenson, I. and P. M. Torrens. 2004b. Geosimulation: object-based modeling of urban phenomena. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28:1-8.
9. Benenson, I., S. Aronovich, and S. Noam. 2001. OBEUS: nObject-Based Environment for Urban Simulations. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on GeoComputation, edited by D.V. Pullar. Brisbane: University of Queensland, GeoComputation CD-ROM.
10. Benenson, I., I. Omer, and E. Hatna. 2002. Entity-based modeling of urban residential dynamics: the case of Yaffo, Tel Aviv. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29:491-512.
11. Benenson, I., S. Aronovich, and S. Noam. 2004. Let’s talk objects. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems (forthcoming).
12. Berec, L. 2002. Techniques of spatially explicit individual-based models: construction, simulation, and mean-field analysis. Ecological Modelling 150:55-81.
13. Box, P. 2001. Spatial units as agents: making the landscape an equal player in agent-based simulations. In Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-Based Modeling Techniques for Simulating Social and Ecological Processes, edited by H.R. Gimblett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Brown, John Seely and Paul Duguid. 2000. The Social Life of Information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
15. Chapin, F. S. and S. F. Weiss. 1968. Aprobabilistic model for residential growth. Transportation Research 2:375-390.
16. Couclelis, H. 1985. Cellular worlds: a framework for modeling micro-macro dynamics. Environment and Planning A 17:585-596.
17. Dijkstra, J., H.J.P. Timmermans, and A.J. Jessurun. 2000. A multi-agent cellular automata system for visualising simulated pedestrian activity. In Theoretical and Practical Issues on Cellular Automata, edited by S. Bandini and T. Worsch. London: Springer-Verlag.
18. Epstein, J. M. 1999. Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity 4:41-60.
19. Epstein, J. M. and R. Axtell. 1996. Growing Artificial Societies from the Bottom Up. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
20. Gimblett, H. Randy, Ed. 2002. Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-Based Modeling Techniques for Simulating Social and Ecological Processes, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Hegselmann, R. and A. Flache. 1999. Understanding complex social dynamics: a plea for cellular automata based modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1(3): .
22. Kohler, T. A. 2000. Putting social sciences together again: an introduction to the volume. In Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies, edited by T.A. Kohler and G. Gumerman. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Liu, X.-H. and C. Andersson. 2004. Assessing the impact of temporal dynamics on land-use change modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28: 107-124.
24. Meyer, J.-A., A. Berthoz, D. Floreano, H. L. Roitblat, and S. W. Wilson, Eds. 2000. From Animals to Animats 6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Miller, H. J. 1999. Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: basic theory and computation procedures. Geographical Analysis 31: 187-213.
26. Nakajima, T. 1977. Application de la théorie de l’automate à la simulation de l’évolution de l’espace urbain. In Congrès Sur La Méthodologie De L’Aménagement Et Du Dévelopment. Montreal: Association Canadienne-Française Pour L’Avancement Des Sciences et Comité De Coordination Des Centres De Recherches En Aménagement, Développement Et Planification (CRADEP).
27. Noble, J. 2000. Basic relationship patterns. In Pattern Languages of Program Design 4, edited by N. Harrison, B. Foote and H. Rohnert. New York: Addison-Wesley.
28. O’Sullivan, D. 2001. Exploring spatial process dynamics using irregular cellular automaton models. Geographical Analysis 33:1-18.
29. O’Sullivan, D. and P. M. Torrens. 2000. Cellular models of urban systems. In Theoretical and Practical Issues on Cellular Automata, edited by S. Bandini and T. Worsch. London: Springer-Verlag.
30. Peckham, J., B. MacKellar, and M. Doherty. 1995. Data models for extensible support of explicit relationships in design databases. VLDB Journal 4:157-191.
31. Peuquet, D. J. 2002. Representations of Space and Time. New York: Guilford.
32. Phipps, M. 1989. Dynamic behavior of cellular automata under the constraint of neighborhood coherence. Geographical Analysis 21:197-215.
33. Polhill, J.G., N.M. Gotts, and A.N.R. Law. 2001. Imitative and non-imitative strategies in a land use simulation. Cybernetics and Systems 32:285-307.
34. Portugali, J. 2000. Self-Organization and the City. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
35. Portugali, J., I. Benenson, and I. Omer. 1997. Spatial cognitive dissonance and sociospatial emergence in a self-organizing city. Environment and Planning B 24:263-285.
36. Portugali, J., I. Benenson, and I. Omer. 1994. Socio-spatial residential dynamics: stability and instability within a self-organized city. Geographical Analysis 26: 321-340.
37. Reynolds, C. 1987. Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics 21:25-34.
38. Reynolds, C. 1999. Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. Paper read at Game Developers Conference, at San Jose, CA.
39. Sakoda, J.M. 1971. The checkerboard model of social interaction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1:119-132.
40. Sanders, L., D. Pumain, H. Mathian, F. Guérin-Pace, and S. Bura. 1997. SIMPOP: a multiagent system for the study of urbanism. Environment and Planning B 24:287-305.
41. Schelling, T. C. 1969. Models of segregation. American Economic Review 59: 488-493.
42. Schelling, T. C. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1:143-186.
43. Schelling, T. C. 1974. On the ecology of micro-motives. In The Corporate Society, edited by R. Marris. London: Macmillan.
44. Schelling, T. C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: WW Norton and Company.
45. Schofisch, B. and K.P. Hadeler. 1996. Dimer automata and cellular automata. Physica D 94:188-204.
46. Schumacher, M. 2001. Objective Coordination in Multi-Agent System Engineering. Berlin: Springer.
47. Semboloni, F. 2000. The growth of an urban cluster into a dynamic selfmodifying spatial pattern. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27:549-564.
48. Shi, W. and M. Yick Cheung Pang. 2000. Development of Voronoi-based cellular automata —an integrated dynamic model for Geographical Information Systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14:455-474.
49. Tobler, W. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46:234-240.
50. Tobler, W. 1979. Cellular geography. In Philosophy in Geography, edited by S. Gale and G. Ollson. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
51. Torrens, P. M. 2001. New tools for simulating housing choices. Berkeley, CA: University of California Institute of Business and Economic Research and Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics.
52. Torrens, P. M. 2002a. Cellular automata and multi-agent systems as planning support tools. In Planning Support Systems in Practice, edited by S. Geertman and J. Stillwell. London: Springer-Verlag.
53. Torrens, P. M. 2002b. SprawlSim: modeling sprawling urban growth using automatabased models. In Agent-Based Models of Land-Use/Land-Cover Change, edited by D.C. Parker, T. Berger, S.M. Manson, and W.J. McConnell. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: LUCC International Project Office.
54. Torrens, P. M. 2003. Automata-based models of urban systems. In Advanced Spatial Analysis, edited by P.A. Longley and M. Batty. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
55. Torrens, P. M. 2004a. Geosimulation approaches to traffic modeling. In Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, edited by P. Stopher, K. Button, K. Haynes, and D. Hensher. London: Pergamon.
56. Torrens, P. M. 2004b. Looking forward: remote sensing as dataware for human settlement simulation. In Remote Sensing of Human Settlements, edited by M. Ridd. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
57. Torrens, P. M. and David O’Sullivan. 2000. Cities, cells, and cellular automata: Developing a research agenda for urban geocomputation. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on GeoComputation, edited by R. Abrahart. Manchester: GeoComputation CD-ROM.
58. Torrens, P. M. and David O’Sullivan. 2001. Cellular automata and urban simulation: where do we go from here? Environment and Planning B 28:163-168.
59. Wahle, J., L. Neubert, J. Esser, and M. Schreckenberg. 2001. A cellular automaton traffic flow model for online simulation of traffic. Parallel Computing 27:719-735.
60. White, R., G. Engelen, and I. Uljee. 1997. The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land use dynamics. Environment and Planning B 24:323-343.
61. Woolridge, M.J. and N.R. Jennings. 1995. Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10:115-152.