An integrated system for demolition techniques selection

Architectural Engineering and Design Management

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 130-148

  Anumba, C J ^a   Abdullah, A ^b   Ruikar, K ^c  

^a The Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^c LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Demolition techniques; Integrated systems; Multi criteria decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018413313     PISSN: 17452007     EISSN: 17527589     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3763/aedm.2008.0071     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Abdullah, A., 2003. Intelligent Selection of Demolition Techniques PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, UK
2. Abdullah, A., and Anumba, C. J., 2002a. “ ‘Decision criteria for the selection of demolition techniques’ ”. In Proceedings of the Second International Postgraduate Research Conference, University of Salford, April 2002 Edited by:Sun, M., 410–419. Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
3. Abdullah, A., and Anumba, C. J., 2002b. “ ‘Decision model for the selection of demolition techniques’ ”. In International Conference on Advances in Building Technology, Hong Kong, December 2002, 2 Edited by:Anson, M., 1671–1679. Oxford:Elsevier.
4. Al-Harbi, K. M.A.S., 2001. ‘Application of the AHP in project management’. International Journal of Project Management, 19 (1):19–27.
5. Alhazmi, T., and McCaffer, R., 2000. ‘Project procurement system selection model’. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126 (3):176–184.
6. Diaper, D., ed. 1989. Knowledge Elicitation:Principles, Techniques, and Applications Chichester:Ellis Horwood.
7. Forman, E. H., and Shvartsman, A., 2000. Expert Choice:Advanced Decision Support Software, Expert Choice 2000 Professional Pittsburg, PA:Expert Choice Inc.
8. Hazelrigg, G. A., 2003. ‘Validation of engineering design alternative selection method’. Engineering Optimization, 35 (2):103–120.
9. Kasai, Y., ed. 1988. “ ‘Demolition and Reuse of Concrete and Masonry:Demolition Methods and Practice’ ”. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium held by RILEM (the International Union of Testing and Research Laboratories for Materials and Structures), Nihon Daigaku Kaikan, Tokyo, November 1988 London:Chapman and Hall.
10. Mahdi, I. M., Riley, M. J., Fereig, S. M., and Alex, P. A., 2002. ‘Multi-criteria approach to contractor selection’. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 1 (9):29–37.
11. Saaty, T. L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process:Planning, Priority Setting, and Resource Allocation New York:McGraw-Hill.
12. Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G., 2001. Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science London:Kluwer Academic.
13. Triantaphyllou, E., and Mann, S. H., 1995. ‘Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications:Some challenges’. International Journal of Industrial Engineering:Application and Practice, 2 (1):35–44.
14. Turban, E., and Aronson, J. E., 1998. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 5th edn Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
15. Zeleny, M., 1982. Multiple Criteria Decision Making New York:McGraw-Hill Series in Quantitative Methods for Management. McGraw-Hill