Macro BIM adoption: Comparative market analysis

Automation in Construction

Volumn 81, Issue , 2017, Pages 286-299

  Kassem, Mohamad ^a   Succar, Bilal ^b,c  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ChangeAgents Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

BIM adoption benchmarks; BIM Framework; BIM policy development; Macro adoption models

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; DIFFUSION; SURVEYS;

ADOPTION MODEL; BIM FRAMEWORK; BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING; CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLICY INTERVENTION; STATISTICAL CORRELATION;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 85018274103     PISSN: 09265805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Autodesk, Autodesk Survey Shows Building Information Modelling Continues to Gain Momentum Across Europe. News Room. http://bit.ly/AutodeskSurvey2011, 2011.
2. Baldry, D., Newton, R., Quantitative and Qualitative Research in the Built Environment: Application of Mixed Research Approach, (March). 2001, 10.1108/00438020210415488.
3. Bertram, D., Likert Scales, Topic Repo (the Faculty of Mathematics University of Belgrad). 2009, 1–10.
4. Buckley, J.W., Buckley, M.H., Chiang, H.-F., Research Methodology & Business Decisions. 1976, NAA, New York.
5. Cao, D., Li, H., Wang, G., Impacts of isomorphic pressures on BIM adoption in construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 2014, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000903.
6. Coyne, I.T., Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: merging or clear boundaries?. J. Adv. Nurs. 26 (1997), 623–630.
7. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W., The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev., 1983, 147–160.
8. Economic Policy Unit, A Practical Guide to Policy Making in Northern Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.ofmdfmni.gov.uk/policylink, 2005.
9. Froise, T., Shakantu, W., Diffusion of Innovations: An Assessment of Building Information Modelling Uptake Trends in South Africa. http://bit.ly/1v62nSH, 2014.
10. Geroski, P.A., Models of technology diffusion. Res. Policy 29:4 (2000), 603–625.
11. Gilligan, B., Kunz, J., VDC Use in 2007: Significant Value, Dramatic Growth, and Apparent Business Opportunity. TR171. 2007, 36.
12. Gu, N., London, K., Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Autom. Constr. 19:8 (2010), 988–999, 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.002.
13. Heckathorn, D.D., Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: analyzing continuous variables and controlling for differential recruitment. Sociol. Methodol. 41:2011 (2015), 355–366.
14. Hippel, E. Von, Franke, N., Prügl, R., Pyramiding: efficient search for rare subjects. Res. Policy 38 (2009), 1397–1406, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.005.
15. Kassem, M., Succar, B., Dawood, N., A proposed approach to comparing the BIM maturity of countries. CIB W078 - 30th International Conference on Applications of IT in the AEC Industry, October 9–12, Beijing, China, 2013, 10.13140/2.1.2308.5766.
16. Kassem, M., Succar, B., Dawood, N., Building Information Modeling: Analyzing Noteworthy Publications of Eight Countries Using a Knowledge Content Taxonomy. Issa, R., Olbina, S., (eds.) Building Information Modeling: Applications and Practices in the AEC Industry, 2014, ASCE Press, 10.1061/9780784413982.ch13.
17. Khosrowshahi, F., Arayici, Y., Roadmap for implementation of BIM in the UK construction industry. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 19:6 (2012), 610–635, 10.1108/09699981211277531.
18. Kjartansdóttir, I.B., BIM Adoption in Iceland and Its Relation to Lean Construction. (Master's of Science in Construction Management Master's), 2011, Reykjavík University, Reykjavík.
19. Koerber, A., McMichael, L., Qualitative sampling methods: a primer for technical communicators. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 22:4 (2008), 454–473.
20. Latour, B., Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Bijker, W.E., Law, J., (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society, 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 225–258.
21. Lehtinen, T., Advantages and Disadvantages of Vertical Integration in the Implementation of Systemic Process Innovations: Case Studies on Implementing Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the Finnish Construction Industry. (Master's Thesis), 2010, Aalto University Retrieved from http://lib.tkk.fi/Dipl/2010/urn100299.pdf.
22. Linderoth, H.C.J., Automation in construction understanding adoption and use of BIM as the creation of actor networks. Autom. Constr. 19:1 (2010), 66–72, 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.09.003.
23. Liu, R., Issa, R., Olbina, S., Factors influencing the adoption of building information modeling in the AEC Industry. Tizani, W., (eds.) Computing in Civil and Building Engineering Proceedings of the International Conference, 2010, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK (30 June-2 July, 2010, ISBN 978-1-907284-60-1) http://www.engineering.nottingham.ac.uk/icccbe/proceedings/html/contents.
24. Luthra, A., Implementation of Building Information Modeling in Architectural Firms in India. (Master's of Science Master's), 2010, Purdue University.
25. McGraw-Hill-Construction, The business value of BIM Europe. SmartMarket Report, 2010.
26. McGraw-Hill-Construction, The business value of BIM in North America: multi-year trend analysis and user ratings (2007–2012). SmartMarket Report, 2012.
27. McGraw-Hill-Construction, The business value of BIM in Australia and New Zealand. SmartMarket Report, 2014.
28. Mom, M., Tsai, M.H., Hsieh, S.-H., On decision-making and technology-implementing factors for BIM adoption. Bargstädt, H.J., Ailland, K., (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, 2011, Verlag der Bauhaus-Universitat Weimar, Weimar, Germany (3-4 November 2011, ISBN 978-3-86068-458-0, doi: nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111102-15603).
29. NBS, International BIM report 2013. Newcastle Upon Type, 2013, NBS, UK.
30. NBS, International BIM report 2014. Newcastle Upon Type, 2014, NBS, UK.
31. NBS, International BIM report 2014. Newcastle Upon Type, 2016, NBS, UK.
32. Noy, C., Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research. vol. 11(4), 2008, 327–344, 10.1080/13645570701401305.
33. Ostrom, E., Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York.
34. Ostrom, E., Understanding Institutional Diversity. 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
35. Panuwatwanich, K., Peansupap, V., Factors affecting the current diffusion of BIM: a qualitative study of online professional network. Hajdu, M., Skibniewski, M.J., (eds.) Proceedings of Creative Construction Conference, 2013, Szent Istvan University Ybl Miklos Faculty, Budapest, Hungary, 575–586 (July 6–9, 2013, ISBN 978-963-269-297-5).
36. RICS, Collaborative Building Information Modelling (BIM): Insights From Behavioural Economics and Incentive Theory, Report for Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. 2015, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), London http://www.rics.org/research.
37. Samuelson, O., Björk, B.-C., Adoption processes for EDM, EDI and BIM technologies in the construction industry. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 19:Suppl. 1 (2013), S172–S187, 10.3846/13923730.2013.801888.
38. Smith, P., BIM implementation: global strategies. Procedia Eng. 85:2014 (2014), 482–492, 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.575 (ISSN 1877-7058).
39. Succar, B., Automation in construction building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom. Constr. 18:3 (2009), 357–375, 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003.
40. Succar, B., Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom. Constr. 18:3 (2009), 357–375, 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003.
41. Succar, B., Building information modelling maturity matrix. Underwood, J., Isikdag, U., (eds.) Handbook of Research on Building Information Modelling and Construction Informatics: Concepts and Technologies, 2010, Information Science Reference, IGI Publishing, 65–103.
42. Succar, B., The five components of BIM performance measurement. Barret, P. Proceedings of CIB 2010 World Congress, 2010, Salford Quays, UK (10–13 May 2010, ISBN 978-1-905732-91-3) http://www.disaster-resilience.net/cib2010/.
43. Succar, B., Kassem, M., Automation in construction macro-BIM adoption: conceptual structures. Autom. Constr. 57 (2015), 64–79, 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.04.018.
44. Succar, Kassem, Building information modelling: point of adoption. Nenonen, S., Junnonen, J.M., (eds.) Proceedings of the CIB World Building Congress 2016, vol. IV, 2016 (Tampere, Finland, May 30–June 3, 2016, pp. ISBN 978-952-15-3744-8) https://tutcris.tut.fi/portal/files/6186967/WBC16_Vol_4.pdf.
45. Wong, A.K.D., Wong, F.K.W., Nadeem, A., Attributes of building information modelling implementations in various countries. Architectural Engineering and Design Management Special Issue: Integrated Design and Delivery Solutions, 6, 2010, 288–302.
46. Young, O., The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge.
47. Young, B.H.P., American economic association. Innovation Diffusion in Heterogeneous Populations: Contagion, Social Influence, and Social Learning Author (s): H. Peyton Young Source: The American Economic Review, vol. 99 (5), 2009, 1899–1924.
48. Zahrizan, Z., Ali, N.M., Haron, A.T., Marshall-Ponting, A., Abd, Z., Exploring the adoption of building information modelling (BIM) in the Malaysian construction industry: a qualitative approach. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 2:8 (2013), 384–395.
49. Strang, D., Adding social structure to diffusion models: an event history framework. Sociol. Methods Res. 19 (1991), 324–353.
50. Jentoft, S., Institutions in Fisheries: What They Are, What They Do, and How They Change. Mar. Policy 28:2 (2004), 137–149.