A Randomized Controlled Trial of Assisted Intention Monitoring for the Rehabilitation of Executive Impairments Following Acquired Brain Injury

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 323-333

  Gracey, Fergus ^a,b,c   Fish, Jessica E ^c,d   Greenfield, Eve ^d   Bateman, Andrew ^b,c   Malley, Donna ^c   Hardy, Gemma ^c,d   Ingham, Jessica ^c,d   Evans, Jonathan J ^e   Manly, Tom ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Alliance   (United Kingdom)

^c Princess of Wales Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^d MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

brain injuries; executive function; rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSING OVER; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EFFECT SIZE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEUROREHABILITATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PROSPECTIVE MEMORY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITIVE THERAPY; GAME; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE PHONE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

BRAIN INJURIES; CELL PHONES; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; GOALS; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85018269116     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968316680484     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Stuss DT., Traumatic brain injury: relation to executive dysfunction and the frontal lobes. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011; 24: 584-589.
2. Burgess PW, Veitch E, de Lacy Costello A, Shallice T., The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38: 848-863.
3. Hanks RA, Rapport LJ, Millis SR, Deshpande SA., Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1030-1037.
4. Spitz G, Ponsford JL, Rudzki D, Maller JJ., Association between cognitive performance and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal multilevel examination. Neuropsychology. 2012; 26: 604-612.
5. Levine B, Schweizer TA, O'Connor C, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5: 9.
6. Levine B, Robertson IH, Clare L, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functioning: an experimental-clinical validation of Goal Management Training. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000; 6: 299-312.
7. Lezak MD., Neuropsychological Assessment. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2004.
8. Fish J, Wilson BA, Manly T., The assessment and rehabilitation of prospective memory problems in people with neurological disorders: a review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010; 20: 161-179.
9. Ellis JA,. Memory for future intentions: investigating pulses and steps. In: Gruneberg MM, Morris PE, Sykes RN, eds. Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues. Vol 1. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1988: 371-376.
10. Duncan J, Emslie H, Williams P, Johnson R, Freer C., Intelligence and the frontal lobe: the organization of goal-directed behavior. Cogn Psychol. 1996; 30: 257-303.
11. Ponsford J, Bayley M, Wiseman-Hakes C, et al. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part II: attention and information processing speed. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014; 29: 321-337.
12. Velikonja D, Tate R, Ponsford J, McIntyre A, Janzen S, Bayley M., INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part V: memory. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014; 29: 369-386.
13. Brands I, Kohler S, Stapert S, Wade D, van Heugten C., How flexible is coping after acquired brain injury? A 1-year prospective study investigating coping patterns and influence of self-efficacy, executive functioning and self-awareness. J Rehabil Med. 2014; 46: 869-875.
14. Krpan KM, Levine B, Stuss DT, Dawson DR., Executive function and coping at one-year post traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007; 29: 36-46.
15. Robertson IH, Manly T, Stuss DT, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5: 9.
16. Krasny-Pacini A, Chevignard M, Evans J., Goal management training for rehabilitation of executive functions: a systematic review of effectivness in patients with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2014; 36: 105-116.
17. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 519-530.
18. Manly T, Hawkins K, Evans J, Woldt K, Robertson IH., Rehabilitation of executive function: facilitation of effective goal management on complex tasks using periodic auditory alerts. Neuropsychologia. 2002; 40: 271-281.
19. Manly T, Heutink J, Davison B, et al. An electronic knot in the handkerchief: "content free cueing" and the maintenance of attentive control. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004; 14: 89-116.
20. Tate R, Kennedy M, Ponsford J, et al. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part III: executive function and self-awareness. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014; 29: 338-352.
21. O'Connor C, Robertson IH, Levine B., The prosthetics of vigilant attention: random cuing cuts processing demands. Neuropsychology. 2011; 25: 535-543.
22. Tornas S, Lovstad M, Solbakk AK, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functions in patients with chronic acquired brain injury with goal management training, external cuing, and emotional regulation: a randomized controlled trial. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016; 22: 436-452.
23. Fish J, Evans JJ, Nimmo M, et al. Rehabilitation of executive dysfunction following brain injury: "content-free" cueing improves everyday prospective memory performance. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45: 1318-1330.
24. Council MR., Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. London, UK: Medical Research Council; 2008.
25. Wilson BA, Evans JJ, Emslie H, Malinek V., Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997; 63: 113-115.
26. Wilson BA, Bateman A, Evans JJ,. The Understanding Brain Injury (UBI) group. In: Wilson BA, Gracey F, Evans JJ, Bateman A, eds. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: Theory, Models, Therapy and Outcome. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009: 68-80.
27. Nelson HE., The National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. Berkshire, UK: NFER-Nelson; 1982.
28. Baddeley A, Emslie H, Nimmo-Smith I., The Speed and Capacity of Language Processing. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Co; 1992.
29. Wechsler D., Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Edition, UK. London, UK: The Psychological Corporation; 1999.
30. Wechsler D., Wechsler Memory Scale. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
31. Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH., Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation; 2001.
32. Manly T, Robertson IH,. The Sustained Attention to Response Test (SART). In: Laurent I, Geraint R, Tsotsos JK, Laurent Itti GR, John KT, eds. Neurobiology of Attention. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2005: 337-338.
33. Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J., "Oops!": performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia. 1997; 35: 747-758.
34. Burgess P, Alderman N, Emslie H, Evans J, Wilson B, Shallice T., The Simplified Six Element Test: Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Co; 1996.
35. Endler NS, Parker JDA, Ridder DTD, van Heck GL., Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Swets Test Publishers; 2004.
36. Brands IMH, Köhler S, Stapert SZ, Wade DT, van Heugten CM,. Psychometric properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) in patients with acquired brain injury. Psychol Assess. 2014; 26: 848-856.
37. Simblett SK, Gracey F, Ring H, Bateman A., Measuring coping style following acquired brain injury: a modification of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations Using Rasch analysis. Br J Clin Psychol. 2015; 54: 249-265.
38. McNair D, Lorr M, Droppleman L., Revised Manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services. 1992; 731-733.
39. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A., G∗ Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191.
40. Fish J, Manly T, Emslie H, Evans JJ, Wilson BA., Compensatory strategies for acquired disorders of memory and planning: differential effects of a paging system for patients with brain injury of traumatic versus cerebrovascular aetiology. J Neurol. 2008; 79: 930-935.
41. Khoyratty NB, Wang Y, O'Gorman JG, et al. Forming implementation intentions improves prospective memory in early psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 228: 265-271.
42. Kersten P, McPherson KM, Kayes NM, Theadom A, McCambridge A., Bridging the goal intention-action gap in rehabilitation: a study of if-then implementation intentions in neurorehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37: 1073-1081.
43. Cuberos-Urbano G, Caracuel A, Valls-Serrano C, Garcia-Mochon L, Gracey F, Verdejo-Garcia A,. A pilot investigation of the potential for incorporating lifelog technology into executive function rehabilitation for enhanced transfer of self-regulation skills to everyday life [published online June 2, 2016]. Neuropsychol Rehabil. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1187630.