Interprofessional education in the care of people diagnosed with dementia: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Pelone, Ferruccio ^a   Reeves, Scott ^a   Ioannides, Andreas ^a   Emery, Claire ^a   Titmarsh, Kumud ^a   Jackson, Marcus ^a   Hassenkamp, Anne Marie ^a   Greenwood, Nan ^a  

^a KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; DEMENTIA; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DEMENTIA; EDUCATION, PROFESSIONAL; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 85018215093     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2014-007490     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Dementia: a public health priority. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75263/1/9789241564458_eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 28 Nov 2014).
2. Prince M, Prina M, Guerchet M. World Alzheimer report 2013. Journey of caring: An analysis of long-term care for dementia. London, UK: Alzheimer's Disease International, 2013. http://www.alz.co.uk/research/world-report-2013 (accessed 28 Nov 2014).
3. Hammick M, Freeth D, Koppel I, et al. A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Med Teach 2007;29:735-51.
4. Sockalingam S, Tan A, Hawa R, et al. Interprofessional education for delirium care: a systematic review. J Interprof Care 2014;28:345-51.
5. Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, et al. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;3:CD002213.
6. Brody AA, Galvin JE. A review of interprofessional dissemination and education interventions for recognizing and managing dementia. Gerontol Geriatr Educ 2013;34:225-56.
7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264-9, W64.
8. Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR), 2004; HTA Initiative HTA Initiative, 02(13). http://www.ihe.ca/documents/HTA-FR13.pdf (accessed 28 Nov 2014).
9. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. for the GRADE Working Group. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924-6.
10. Biggs JB. What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical view and clarification. Br J Educ Psychol 1993;63:3-19.
11. Freeth D, Reeves S. Learning to work together: using the presage, process, product (3P) model to highlight decisions and possibilities. J Interprof Care 2004;18:43-56.
12. Reeves S, Freeth D. Re-examining the evaluation of interprofessional education for community mental health teams with a different lens: understanding presage, process and product factors. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2006;13:765-70.