The Supertree Toolkit 2: A new and improved software package with a Graphical User Interface for supertree construction

Biodiversity Data Journal

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Hill, Jon ^a   Davis, Katie E ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data curation; Meta data; Phylogeny; Supertree

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018194007     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13142828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1053     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bininda-Emonds O, Beck R, Purvis A (2005) Getting to the Roots of Matrix Representation. Systematic Biology 54 (4): 668-672. DOI: 10.1080/10635150590947113
2. Bininda-Emonds O, Jones KE, Price S, Cardillo M, Grenyer R, Purvis A (2004) Garbage in, garbage out: data issues in supertree construction. In: Bininda-Emonds OP (Ed.) Phylogenetic supertrees: combining information to reveal the Tree of Life. Kluwer Academic Publishers [ISBN 978-1-4020-2329-3]
3. Cardillo M, Bininda-Emonds OP, Boakes E, Purvis A (2004) A species-level phylogenetic supertree of marsupials. Journal of Zoology 264 (1): 11-31. DOI: 10.1017/S0952836904005539
4. Cornwallis C, West S, Davis K, Griffin A (2010) Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature 466 (7309): 969-972. DOI: 10.1038/nature09335
5. Crozier RH, Dunnett LJ, Agapow P (2005) Phylogenetic biodiversity assessment based on systematic nomenclature. Evolutionary bioinformatics online 1: 11-36
6. Davies TJ, Barraclough TG, Chase MW, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Savolainen V (2004) Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (7): 1904-1909. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0308127100
7. Davis K (2008) Reweaving the Tapestry: A supertree of birds. University of Glasgow, 269 pp. URL: http://theses.gla.ac.uk/178/
8. Davis KE, Hill J (2010) The Supertree Tool Kit. BMC Research Notes 3 (1): 95. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-95
9. Edwards E, Still C, Donoghue M (2007) The relevance of phylogeny to studies of global change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22 (5): 243-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.02.002
10. Gatesy J (2004) A Critique of Matrix Representation with Parsimony Supertrees. In: Bininda-Emonds OP (Ed.) Phylogenetic Supertrees. Spinger [ISBN 978-1-4020-2329-3]. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2330-9_18
11. Goloboff P, Farris J, Nixon K (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24 (5): 774-786. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x
12. Ham DA, Farrell PE, Gorman GJ, Maddison JR, Wilson CR, Kramer SC, Shipton J, Collins GS, Cotter CJ, Piggott MD (2009) Spud 1.0: generalising and automating the user interfaces of scientific computer models. Geoscientific Model Development 2 (1): 33-42. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2-33-2009
13. Han MV, Zmasek CM (2009) phyloXML: XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 10 (1): 356. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-356
14. Helmus M, Bland T, Williams C, Ives A (2007) Phylogenetic Measures of Biodiversity. The American Naturalist 169 (3): E68-E83. DOI: 10.1086/511334
15. Isaac NB, Turvey S, Collen B, Waterman C, Baillie JM (2007) Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation Priorities Based on Threat and Phylogeny. PLoS ONE 2 (3): e296. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000296
16. Jeffery J, Wilkinson M (2004) PerlEQ
17. Lloyd GT, Davis KE, Pisani D, Tarver JE, Ruta M, Sakamoto M, Hone DW, Jennings R, Benton MJ (2008) Dinosaurs and the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275 (1650): 2483-2490. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0715
18. Ragan M (1992) Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1 (1): 53-58. DOI: 10.1016/1055-7903 (92)90035-F
19. Sanderson M, Purvis A, Henze C (1998) Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13 (3): 105-109. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01242-1
20. Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts
21. Vos RA, Balhoff JP, Caravas JA, Holder MT, Lapp H, Maddison WP, Midford PE, Priyam A, Sukumaran J, Xia X, Stoltzfus A (2012) NeXML: rich, extensible, and verifiable representation of comparative data and metadata. Systematic Biology 61 (4): 675-689. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys025
22. Wilkinson M (1995) Coping with Abundant Missing Entries in Phylogenetic Inference Using Parsimony. Systematic Biology 44 (4): 501-514. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/44.4.501
23. Wilkinson M (2001) TAXEQ3. Software and documentation. Natural History Museum, London