Introduction: Ethics and anticipatory governance of nano-neurotechnological convergence

Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-17

  Robert, Jason Scott ^a   Miller, Clark A ^a   Milleson, Valerye ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BRAIN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; HUMAN BRAIN; HUMAN CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEMS; INTERDISCIPLINARY FIELDS; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS;

FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING;

EID: 85018101077     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1787-9_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Allhoff, Fritz. 2008. On the autonomy and justification of nanoethics. In Nanotechnology & society:Current and emerging ethical issues, ed. Fritz Allhoff and Patrick Lin, 3-38. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
2. Alpert, Sheri. 2008. Neuroethics and nanoethics: Do we risk ethical myopia? Neuroethics 1:55-68.
3. Berne, Rosalyn W. 2006. Nanotalk: Conversations with scientists and engineers about ethics, meaning, and belief in the development of nanotechnology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bond, Phillip J. 2003. Preparing the path for nanotechnology. In Nanotechnology: Societal implications - Maximizing benefits for humanity: Report of the national nanotechnology initiative workshop, December 2-3, 2003, ed. Mihail C. Roco and Williams Sims Bainbridge, 16-21. Arlington: National Science Foundation.
5. Drexler, K.Eric. 1986. Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology. New York: Anchor Books.
6. Godman, Marion. 2008. But is it unique to nanotechnology? Science and Engineering Ethics 14:391-403.
7. Grunwald, Armin. 2000. Against over-estimating the role of ethics in technology development. Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 181-196.
8. Grunwald, Armin. 2005. Nanotechnology - A new field of ethical inquiry? Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 187-201.
9. Guston, David H. 2008. Innovation policy: Not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454: 940-941.
10. Guston, David H., and Daniel Sarewitz. 2002. Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society 24: 93-109.
11. Hansson, Sven Ove. 2004. Great uncertainty about small things. Technè 8(2): 26-35.
12. Hodge, Graeme, Diana Bowman, and Karinne Ludlow. 2007. Introduction: Big questions for small technologies. In New global frontiers in regulation: The age of nanotechnology, ed. Graeme Hodge, Diana Bowman, and Karinne Ludlow, 3-26. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
13. Holm, Sören. 2005. Does nanotechnology require a new ʼnanoethics’? London: Cardiff Centre for Ethics, Law & Society.
14. Johnson, Deborah G. 2007. Ethics and technology ‘in the making’: An essay on the challenge of nanoethics. NanoEthics 1: 21-30.
15. Kaiser, Mario. 2006. Drawing boundaries of nanoscience - Rationalizing the concerns? The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34: 667-674.
16. Keiper, Adam. 2007. Nanoethics as a discipline? The New Atlantis 16: 55-67.
17. Lin, Patrick, and Fritz Allhoff. 2007. Nanoscience and nanoethics: Defining the discipline. In Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology, ed. Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin, James Moor, and John Weckert, 3-16. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.
18. Litton, Paul. 2007. “Nanoethics”? What’s new? The Hastings Center Report 37: 22-25.
19. Meaney, Mark E. 2006. Lessons from the sustainability movement: Toward an integrative decisionmaking framework for nanotechnology. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34: 682-688.
20. Nordmann, Alfred. 2007. If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics 1: 31-46.
21. Parens, Erik, and Josaphine Johnston. 2007. Does it make sense to speak of neuroethics? European Molecular Biology Organization 8: S61-S64.
22. Parr, Douglas. 2005. Will nanotechnology make the world a better place? Trends in Biotechnology 23(8): 395-398.
23. Pidgeon, Nick, and Tee Rogers-Hayden. 2007. Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the public: Risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’? Health, Risk and Society 9(2):191-210.
24. Resnik, David B. 1998. The ethics of science: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
25. Robert, Jason Scott. 2008. Nanoscience, nanoscientists, and controversy. In Nanotechnology & society: Current and emerging ethical issues, ed. Fritz Allhoff and Patrick Lin, 225-239. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
26. Robert, Jason Scott, Ira Bennett, and Jennifer Brian. Forthcoming. Just scenarios? Cultivating anticipatory assessment of novel nanotechnologies.
27. Roco, Mihail C. 2003. Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5: 181-189.
28. Roco, Mihail C., and W.S. Bainbridge (eds.). 2003. Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. van de Poel, Ibo. 2008. How should we do nanoethics? A network approach for discerning ethical issues in nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2: 25-38.
30. Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.