Development and application of the RE-AIM QuEST mixed methods framework for program evaluation

Preventive Medicine Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2017, Pages 322-328

  Forman, Jane ^a   Heisler, Michele ^a,b   Damschroder, Laura J ^a   Kaselitz, Elizabeth ^a,b   Kerr, Eve A ^a,b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical pharmacist intervention; Mixed methods; Program evaluation; RE AIM

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PHARMACY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 85017617621     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22113355     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Averill, J.B., Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual. Health Res. 12:6 (2002), 855–866.
2. Bakken, S., Ruland, C.M., Translating clinical informatics interventions into routine clinical care: how can the RE-AIM framework help?. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16:6 (2009), 889–897 (PMC3002125).
3. Balas, E.A., Boren, S.A., Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearb. Med. Inform. 1 (2000), 65–70.
4. Damschroder, L.J., Hagedorn, H.J., A guiding framework and approach for implementation research in substance use disorders treatment. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 25:2 (2011), 194–205.
5. Damschroder, L.J., Aron, D.C., Keith, R.E., Kirsh, S.R., Alexander, J.A., Lowery, J.C., Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement. Sci., 4, 2009, 50 (PMCID: PMC2736161).
6. Estabrook, B., Zapka, J., Lemon, S.C., Evaluating the implementation of a hospital work-site obesity prevention intervention: applying the RE-AIM framework. Health Promot. Pract. 13:2 (2012), 190–197.
7. Estabrooks, P.A., Allen, K.C., Updating, employing, and adapting: a commentary on what does it mean to “employ” the RE-AIM model. Eval. Health Prof. 36:1 (2013), 67–72.
8. Fetters, M.D., Curry, L.A., Creswell, J.W., Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv. Res. 48:6 Pt 2 (2013), 2134–2156 (PMC4097839).
9. Forman, J., Damschroder, L., Qualitative Content Analysis. Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer. 2007, 39–62.
10. Glasgow, R.E., Strycker, L.A., King, D.K., et al. Robustness of a computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention across patient characteristics, healthcare settings, and intervention staff. Am. J. Manag. Care 12:3 (2006), 137–145.
11. Harden, S.M., Gaglio, B., Shoup, J.A., et al. Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review. Syst. Rev., 4, 2015, 155 (PMC4637141).
12. Heisler, M., Hofer, T.P., Klamerus, M.L., et al. Study protocol: the Adherence and Intensification of Medications (AIM) study—a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness study. Trials, 11, 2010, 95 (PMCID: PMC2967508).
13. Heisler, M., Hofer, T.P., Schmittdiel, J.A., et al. Improving blood pressure control through a clinical pharmacist outreach program in patients with diabetes mellitus in 2 high-performing health systems: the adherence and intensification of medications cluster randomized, controlled pragmatic trial. Circulation 125:23 (2012), 2863–2872 (PMCID: PMC3999872).
14. Kessler, R.S., Purcell, E.P., Glasgow, R.E., Klesges, L.M., Benkeser, R.M., Peek, C.J., What does it mean to “employ” the RE-AIM model?. Eval. Health Prof. 36:1 (2013), 44–66.
15. Klesges, L.M., Estabrooks, P.A., Dzewaltowski, D.A., Bull, S.S., Glasgow, R.E., Beginning with the application in mind: designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. Ann. Behav. Med. 29:Suppl (2005), 66–75.
16. McGlynn, E.A., Asch, S.M., Adams, J., et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:26 (2003), 2635–2645.
17. Patton, M., Use of Multiple Data Sources Allows Triangulation of Data and Provides a more Holistic and Valid Understanding of the Implementation Intervention at each Site. 2001, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
18. Stetler, C.B., Legro, M.W., Wallace, C.M., et al. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 21:Suppl. 2 (2006), S1–S8.
19. Taylor-Powell, E., Steele, S., Collecting evaluation data: Direct observation. Program Development and Evaluation. 1996, University of Wisconsin-Extension, Wisconsin.
20. Tunis, S.R., Stryer, D.B., Clancy, C.M., Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 290:12 (2003), 1624–1632.
21. Ware, J.H., Hamel, M.B., Pragmatic trials—guides to better patient care?. N. Engl. J. Med. 364:18 (2011), 1685–1687.