Meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 660-668

  Huttner F J ^a   Probst, P ^a   Knebel, P ^a   Strobel, O ^a   Hackert, T ^a   Ulrich, A ^a   Buchler M W ^a   Diener, M K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; META ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC FISTULA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REOPERATION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC FISTULA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REOPERATION;

EID: 85017539581     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10505     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z'Graggen K. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 1310–1314.
2. Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220: 530–536.
3. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al.; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8–13.
4. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007; 142: 761–768.
5. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007; 142: 20–25.
6. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR. Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (3)CD006232.
7. Wang Z, Chen J, Su K, Dong Z. Abdominal drainage versus no drainage post-gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (5)CD008788.
8. Zhang HY, Zhao CL, Xie J, Ye YW, Sun JF, Ding ZH et al. To drain or not to drain in colorectal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31: 951–960.
9. Cyr DP, Truong JL, Lam-McCulloch J, Cleary SP, Karanicolas PJ. Canadian practice patterns for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Can J Surg 2015; 58: 121–127.
10. Haane C, Mardin WA, Schmitz B, Dhayat S, Hummel R, Senninger N et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy – current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013; 398: 1097–1105.
11. Giovinazzo F, Butturini G, Salvia R, Mascetta G, Monsellato D, Marchegiani G et al. Drain management after pancreatic resection: state of the art. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011; 18: 779–784.
12. Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D'Angelica M, Fong Y, Dematteo RP, Kingham TP et al. Operative drainage following pancreatic resection: analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution. Ann Surg 2013; 258: 1051–1058.
13. Fisher WE, Hodges SE, Silberfein EJ, Artinyan A, Ahern CH, Jo E et al. Pancreatic resection without routine intraperitoneal drainage. HPB (Oxford) 2011; 13: 503–510.
14. Mehta VV, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Staley CA, Kooby DA. Is it time to abandon routine operative drain use? A single institution assessment of 709 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216: 635–642.
15. Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, Smith A, Jarnagin W, Coit DG et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 487–493.
16. Van Buren G II, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ, Winter J, Behrman SW, Zyromski NJ et al. A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 605–612.
17. Peng S, Cheng Y, Yang C, Lu J, Wu S, Zhou R et al. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (8)CD010583.
18. van der Wilt AA, Coolsen MM, de Hingh IH, van der Wilt GJ, Groenewoud H, Dejong CH et al. To drain or not to drain: a cumulative meta-analysis of the use of routine abdominal drains after pancreatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 2013; 15: 337–344.
19. Wang YC, Szatmary P, Zhu JQ, Xiong JJ, Huang W, Gomatos I et al. Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 2510–2521.
20. Witzigmann H, Diener MK, Kienkotter S, Rossion I, Bruckner T, Barbel W et al. No need for routine drainage after pancreatic head resection: the dual-center, randomized, controlled PANDRA trial (ISRCTN04937707). Ann Surg 2016; 264: 528–537.
21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535.
22. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928.
23. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S et al.; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328: 1490.
24. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13.
25. US Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE); version 4.03, 14 June 2010. http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf [accessed 24 January 2017].
26. Allen PJ. Operative drains after pancreatic resection – the Titanic is sinking. HPB (Oxford) 2011; 13: 595.
27. McMillan MT, Malleo G, Bassi C, Sprys MH, Vollmer CM Jr. Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17: 1145–1154.
28. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G et al. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1514–1522.
29. Huttner FJ, Mihaljevic AL, Hackert T, Ulrich A, Buchler MW, Diener MK. Effectiveness of Tachosil® in the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2016; 401: 151–159.
30. Alsfasser G, Leicht H, Gunster C, Rau BM, Schillinger G, Klar E. Volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2016; 103: 136–143.
31. Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW, Post PN, van de Velde CJ, Tollenaar RA et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 485–494.
32. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 786–795.
33. McMillan MT, Malleo G, Bassi C, Allegrini V, Casetti L, Drebin JA et al. Multicenter, prospective trial of selective drain management for pancreatoduodenectomy using risk stratification. Ann Surg 2016; [Epub ahead of print].