Stimulus-induced reversal of information flow through a cortical network for animacy perception

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 129-135

  Shultz, Sarah ^a   van den Honert, Rebecca N ^a   Engell, Andrew D ^a   McCarthy, Gregory ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animate; Dynamic casual modeling; Effective connectivity; Fusiform; pSTS

Indexed keywords

BRAIN CORTEX; CINGULATE GYRUS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTIVATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; FACE; FEMALE; GOALS; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MOTION PERCEPTION; NERVE NET; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85017286339     PISSN: 17495016     EISSN: 17495024     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsu028     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adolphs, R. (2001). The neurobiology of social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11(2), 231-9.
2. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Beauchamp, M.S., Lee, K.E., Haxby, J.V., Martin, A. (2003). FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(7), 991-1001.
4. Bíró , S., Csibra, G., Gergely, G. (2007). The role of behavioral cues in understanding goaldirected actions in infancy. Progress in Brain Research, 164, 303-22.
5. Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Ostry, D., Evans, A. (1996). Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16(11), 3737-44.
6. Carey, S., Spelke, E. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In: Hirschfeld, L., Gelman, S., editors. Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169-200.
7. Carey, S., Spelke, E. (1996). Science and core knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 515-33.
8. Csibra, G., Bíró , S., Koós, O., Gergely, G. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Science, 27(1), 111-33.
9. Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Bíró , S., Koó s, O., Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of "pure reason" in infancy. Cognition, 72(3), 237-67.
10. Engell, A.D., McCarthy, G. (2010). Selective attention modulates face-specific induced gamma oscillations recorded from ventral occipitotemporal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(26), 8780-6.
11. Engell, A.D., McCarthy, G. (2011). The relationship of gamma oscillations and face-specific ERPs recorded subdurally from occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 21(5), 1213-21.
12. Engell, A.D., McCarthy, G. (2013). Probabilistic atlases for face and biological motion perception: an analysis of their reliability and overlap. Neuroimage, 74, 140-51.
13. Fairhall, S.L., Ishai, A. (2007). Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. Cerebral Cortex, 17(10), 2400-6.
14. Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P.F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308(5722), 662-7.
15. Friston, K. (2011). Dynamic causal modeling and granger causality comments on: the identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. Brain, 58, 303-5.
16. Friston, K.J., Harrison, L., Penny, W. (2003). Dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage, 19, 1273-302.
17. Friston, K.J., Mattout, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N., Ashburner, J., Penny, W. (2007). Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation. Neuroimage, 34(1), 220-34.
18. Gao, T., Scholl, B.J., McCarthy, G. (2012). Dissociating the detection of intentionality from animacy in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(41), 14276-80.
19. Gergely, G., Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naïve theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 287-92.
20. Gibson, E.J., Owsley, C.J., Johnston, J. (1978). Perception of invariants by five-month-old infants: differentiation of two types of motion. Developmental Psychology, 14(4), 407-15.
21. Grossman, E., Blake, R. (2002). Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron, 35(6), 1167-75.
22. Guajardo, J.J., Woodward, A.L. (2004). Is agency skin deep? Surface attributes influence infants' sensitivity to goal-directed action. Infancy, 6(3), 361-84.
23. Haxby, J., Hoffman, E., Gobbini, M. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223-33.
24. Hoffman, E.A., Haxby, J.V. (2000). Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 80-4.
25. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., Chun, M.M. (1997). The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302-11.
26. Kass, R.E., Raftery, A.E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773-95.
27. Leslie, A. (1994). ToMM, ToBy, and agency: core architecture and domain specificity. In: Hirscfeld, L., Gelman, S., editors. Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119-48.
28. Leslie, A. (1995). A theory of agency. In: Sperber, D., Premack, D., Premack, A., editors. Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 121-41.
29. McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Gore, J.C., Allison, T. (1997). Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(5), 605-10.
30. O'Toole, A.J., Roark, D.A., Abdi, H. (2002). Recognizing moving faces: a psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 261-6.
31. Peelen, M.V., Downing, P.E. (2005). Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93(1), 603-8.
32. Penny, W.D., Stephan, K.E., Mechelli, A., Friston, K.J. (2004). Comparing dynamic causal models. Neuroimage, 22, 1157-72.
33. Pitcher, D., Walsh, V., Yovel, G., Duchaine, B. (2007). TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Current Biology, 17(18), 1568-73.
34. Premack, D. (1990). The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36(1), 1-16.
35. Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J.C., McCarthy, G. (1996). Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16(16), 5205-15.
36. Puce, A., Allison, T., Bentin, S., Gore, J.C., McCarthy, G. (1998). Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(6), 2188-99.
37. Puce, A., Allison, T., Gore, J.C., McCarthy, G. (1995). Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74(3), 1192-9.
38. Puce, A., Allison, T., McCarthy, G. (1999). Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials. Cerebral Cortex, 9(5), 445-58.
39. Puce, A., Perrett, D. (2003). Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 435-45.
40. Rossion, B., Hanseeuw, B., Dricot, L. (2012). Defining face perception areas in the human brain: a large-scale factorial fMRI face localizer analysis. Brain and Cognition, 79(2), 138-57.
41. Scholl, B., Tremoulet, P. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(8), 299-309.
42. Schwarzlose, R.F., Baker, C.I., Kanwisher, N. (2005). Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(47), 11055-9.
43. Sergent, J., Ohta, S., Macdonald, B. (1992). Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain, 115(1), 15-36.
44. Shultz, S., McCarthy, G. (2012). Goal-directed actions activate the face-sensitive posterior superior temporal sulcus and fusiform gyrus in the absence of human-like perceptual cues. Cerebral Cortex, 22(5), 1098-106.
45. Simion, F., Regolin, L., Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(2), 809-13.
46. Stephan, K.E., Penny, W.D., Moran, R.J., den Ouden, H.E.M., Daunizeau, J., Friston, K.J. (2010). Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage, 49, 3099-109.
47. Tootell, R.B., Taylor, J.B. (1995). Anatomical evidence for MT and additional cortical visual areas in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 5(1), 39-55.
48. Turk-Browne, N.B., Norman-Haignere, S.V., McCarthy, G. (2010). Face-specific resting functional connectivity between the fusiform gyrus and posterior superior temporal sulcus. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 176.
49. Weiner, K.S., Grill-Spector, K. (2011). Neural representations of faces and limbs neighbor in human high-level visual cortex: evidence for a new organization principle. Psychological Research, 77(1), 74-97.