Structuring supplemental materials in support of reproducibility

Genome Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Greenbaum, Dov ^a,b   Rozowsky, Joel ^b   Stodden, Victoria ^c   Gerstein, Mark ^b  

^a INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMICS; MACHINE; REPRODUCIBILITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PUBLICATION; STANDARDS;

DATA DISPLAY; GENOMICS; HUMANS; PUBLICATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 85017166742     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1205-3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pachter L. Bits of DNA: Stories from the supplement. 2 November 2013. https://liorpachter.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/stories-from-the-supplement/. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.
2. Pop M, Salzberg SL. Use and mis-use of supplementary material in science publications. BMC Bioinf. 2015;16:237.
3. Newton-Cheh C, Johnson T, Gateva V, Tobin MD, Bochud M, Coin L, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):666-76.
4. Maunsell J. Announcement regarding supplemental material. J Neurosci. 2010;30(32):10599-600.
5. Marcus E. Taming supplemental material. Cell. 2009;139(1):11.
6. Zittrain J, Albert K, Lessig L. Perma: scoping and addressing the problem of link and reference rot in legal citations. Leg Inf Manag. 2014;14(2):88-99.
7. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68-74.
8. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489(7414):57-74.
9. Force11.org. Guiding principles for findable, accessible, interoperable and re-usable data publishing: version B1.0. https://www.force11.org/node/6062. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.
10. Haak L, Baker D, Höllrigl T. CASRAI and ORCID: Putting the pieces together to collaboratively support the research community. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014;33:284-8.
11. Stodden V. Enabling reproducible research: licensing for scientific innovation. Int J Communications Law Policy. 2009;13:1.
12. Donoho DL, Maleki A, Shahram M, Ur Rahman I, Stodden V. Reproducible research in computational harmonic analysis. Computing Sci Eng. 2009;11(1):8-18.
13. Bechhofer S, Buchan I, De Roure D, Missier P, Ainsworth J, Bhagat J, et al. Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2013;29(2):599-611.
14. Donoho D, Stodden V. Reproducible research in the mathematical sciences. In: Higham NJ, editor. Princeton companion to applied mathematics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 2015. p. 916-24.
15. Garijo D, Gil Y. A new approach for publishing workflows: abstractions, standards, and linked data. Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-scale Science; 2011 Nov 12-18; Seattle, WA, USA. ACM; 2011
16. GalaxyProject.org. https://galaxyproject.org/. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.
17. Deelman E, Gannon D, Shields M, Taylor I. Workflows and e-Science: an overview of workflow system features and capabilities. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2009;25(5):528-40.
18. Seringhaus M, Gerstein M. Manually structured digital abstracts: a scaffold for automatic text mining. FEBS Lett. 2008;582(8):1170.
19. Gerstein M, Seringhaus M, Fields S. Structured digital abstract makes text mining easy. Nature. 2007;447(7141):142.
20. Cheung KH, Samwald M, Auerbach RK, Gerstein MB. Structured digital tables on the Semantic Web: toward a structured digital literature. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:403.