Norwegian internet shopping sites: An application & extension of the technology acceptance model

Journal of Global Information Technology Management

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 54-73

  Savitskie, Katrina ^a   Royne, Marla B ^a   Persinger, Elif S ^b   Grunhagen, Marko ^c   Witte, Carl L ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affinity; International; Internet shopping; Involvement; Technology acceptance model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

EID: 85017103888     PISSN: 1097198X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1097198X.2007.10856455     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alden, D.L., Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., & Batra, R. (1999). Brand positioning through advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe: The role of global consumer culture. Journal of Marketing, 63(January), 75-87.
2. Anderson, J.C. & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(May), 411-423.
3. Babin, B.J., Darden, W.E., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(March), 644-655.
4. Bentler, P.M. (2004). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
5. Churchill, G.A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(4), 64-73.
6. Computer Industry Almanac (2006). http://www.c-i-a.com/pr0106.htm accessed September 3, 2007.
7. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
8. e-Living Consortium (2002). D11.1 — ICT Uptake and usage: panel data analysis, online available at: http://www.eurescom.de/e-living/deliverables/e-liv-Dl1.1-Final.pdf.
9. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Fomell C., & Larcker D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation model with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
11. Gefen, D. & Staub, D.W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease-of-use in is adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. JAIS, 1(8), 1-30.
12. Grunhagen, M., Grove, S.J, & Gentry, J.W. (2003). The dynamics of store hour changes and consumption behavior: Results of a longitudinal study of consumer attitudes toward Saturday shopping in Germany. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1801-1817.
13. Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, (5th Edition), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
14. Houston, M.J. & Rothschild, M.L. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspectives in involvement in Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, Subhash C. Jain, ed., Chicago: American Marketing Association, 184-187. http://www.intemetworldstats.com/europa2.htm.
15. Igbaria, M. and S. Parasuraman. (1989). A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward microcomputers. Journal of Management, 15(3), 373-388.
16. Ihlwan, M., & Hall, K. (2007). New technology, old habits. Business Week, March 26, 48-49.
17. Jackson, C.M., Chow, S., & Leitch, R.A. (1997). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intentions to use an information system. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 357-389.
18. Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(Fall), 349-356.
19. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40(3), 191-204.
20. McCoy, S., Everard, A., & Jones, B.M. (2005). An examination of the technology acceptance model in Uruguay and the US: A focus on culture. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8(2), 27-45.
21. Mittal, B. & Lee, M. (1989). A causal model of consumer involvement. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(3), 363-390.
22. Netemeyer, R.G., Burton, S., & Lichtenstein, D.R. (1995). Trait aspects of vanity: measurement and relevance to consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Res., 21(3), 46-60.
23. Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.), McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
24. Park, C.W. & Young, S.M. (1986). Consumer response to television commercials: The impact of involvement and background music on brand attitude formation. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(1), 11-24.
25. Pei, Z., Zhenxiang, Z. & Chunping, H. (2007). An extended TAM model for Chinese B2C websites design. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 10(1), 51-66.
26. Richins, M.L. & Bloch, P.H. (1991). Post-purchase product satisfaction: Incorporating the effects of involvement and time. Journal of Business Research, 23(2), 145-159.
27. Rubin, A.M. (1981). An examination of television viewing motivations. Communication Research, 8, 141-165.
28. Scott, C.A. & Yalch, R.F. (1980). Consumer response to initial product trial: A bayesian analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(1), 32-41.
29. Singh, N., Fassott, G., Chao, M.C.H., & Hoffmann, J.A. (2006) Understanding international web site usage. International Marketing Review, 23(1), 83-97.
30. Stafford, T.F. & Stafford, M.R. (2001). Identifying motivations for the use of commercial web sites. Information Resources Management Journal, 14(1), 22-30.
31. Stafford, T.F., Turan, A.H., & Khasawneh, A.M. (2006). MIDDLE-EAST.COM: Diffusion of the Internet and online shopping in Jordan and Turkey. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 9(3), 43-61.
32. Strite, M. & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 679-704.
33. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2005). The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/no.html.
34. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
35. Venkatesh, V., Ramesh, V., & Massey, A.P. (2003). Understanding usability in mobile commerce. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 53-56
36. Vrechopoulos, A.P., Siomkos, G.F., & Doukidis, G.I. (2001). Internet shopping adoption by Greek consumers. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(3), 142-152.
37. Wang, C.C., Hsu, Y., & Fang, W. (2004). Acceptance of technology with network externalities: An empirical study. Journal of IT Theory and Application, 6(4), 15-28.
38. Yip, G.S. (2000). Global strategy in the Internet era. Business Strategy Review, 11(4), 1-14.
39. Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.
40. Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59-70