Convergence of self-report and physiological responses for evaluating creativity support tools

C and C 2011 - Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 455-456

  Carroll, Erin A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Creativity evaluation; Creativity support tools; Physiological measures; Self report

Indexed keywords

PHYSIOLOGY;

CREATIVITY EVALUATIONS; CREATIVITY SUPPORT TOOL (CST); CREATIVITY SUPPORT TOOLS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; QUANTITATIVE METRICS; RESEARCH PLANS; SELF-REPORT;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

EID: 85016441606     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2069618.2069748     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. E. A. Carroll and C. Latulipe. Capturing in-The-moment creativity through data triangulation. In Proceedings of ACM Creativity & Cognition 2011, 2011.
2. E. A. Carroll, C. Latulipe, R. Fung, and M. Terry. Creativity factor evaluation: Towards a standardized survey metric for creativity support. In Proceedings of ACM Creativity & Cognition, 2009.
3. P. J. Lang. The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50(5):372-385, 1995.
4. C. Latulipe, E. A. Carroll, and D. Lottridge. Evaluating longitudinial projects combining technology with temporal arts. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011, 2011.
5. C. Latulipe, E. A. Carroll, and D. Lottridge. Love, hate, arousal, and engagement: Exploring audience responses to performing arts. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011, 2011.
6. C. Martindale. Handbook of Creativity, chapter Biological Bases of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
7. B. Shneiderman, G. Fischer, M. Czerwinski, M. Resnick, B. Myers, L. Candy, E. Edmonds, M. Eisenberg, E. Giaccardi, T. Hewett, et al. Creativity support tools: Report from a US National Science Foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(2):61-77, 2006.