Evaluating longitudinal projects combining technology with temporal arts

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1835-1844

  Latulipe, Celine ^a   Carroll, Erin A ^a   Lottridge, Danielle ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Audience evaluation; Creativity; Evaluation; Interactive dance; Performing arts; Temporal arts

Indexed keywords

AUDIENCE EVALUATION; CREATIVITY; DESIGN SPACES; EVALUATION; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; EVALUATION RESULTS; INTERACTIVE DANCE; INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY; PERFORMING ARTS; TEMPORAL ART;

EID: 79958125042     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979209     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. R. Aylward and J. Paradiso. Sensemble: a wireless, compact, multi-user sensor system for interactive dance. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, page 139. IRCAMCentre Pompidou, 2006.
2. S. Bardzell, J. Bardzell, and T. Pace. Understanding affective interaction: Emotion, engagement, and internet videos. In Proc. of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interactio, 2009.
3. L. Barkhuus and T. Jorgensen. Engaging the crowd: studies of audience-performer interaction. In CHI'08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 2925-2930. ACM, 2008.
4. K. Boehner, P. Sengers, and S. Warner. Interfaces with the ineffable: Meeting aesthetic experience on its own terms. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 15(3):1-29, 2008.
5. G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
6. G. Cockton. Make evaluation poverty history. In CHI '07: alt.chi digital proceedings: http://www.viktoria.se/altchi/, 2007.
7. M. Coniglio. The importance of being interactive. New Visions in Performance. The Impact of New Technologies, pages 5-12, 2004.
8. K. de Spain. Dance and technology: A pas de deux for post-humans. Dance Research Journal, 32(1):2-17, 2000.
9. K. Farley. Digital dance theatre: The marriage of computers, choreography and techno/human reactivity. Body, Space and Technology, 3(1):39-46, 2002.
10. K. Hook, P. Sengers, and G. Andersson. Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art. In Proceeding of ACM CHI 2003, 2003.
11. D. Kahneman. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology, pages 3-25. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, USA, 1999.
12. C. Latulipe, D. Wilson, S. Huskey, M. Word, A. Carroll, E. Carroll, B. Gonzalez, V. Singh, M. Wirth, and D. Lottridge. Exploring the design space in technology-augmented dance. In CHI EA '10: Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 2995-3000, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
13. E. Lindström, A. Camurri, A. Friberg, G. Volpe, and M. Rinman. Affect, Attitude and Evaluation of Multisensory Performances. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1):69-86, 2005. (Pubitemid 44011889)
14. L. Loke and T. Robertson. Studies of dancers: Moving from experience to interaction design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 2010.
15. G. Lupyan and I. Rifkin. Dynamics of applause: Modeling group phenomena through agent interaction. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2003, 2003.
16. R. L. Mandryk, M. S. Atkins, and K. M. Inkpen. A continuous and objective evaluation of emotional experience with interactive play environments. In CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 1027-1036, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. (Pubitemid 44032197)
17. W. S. Meador, T. J. Rogers, K. O'Neal, E. Kurt, and C. Cunningham. Mixing dance realities: collaborative development of live-motion capture in a performing arts environment. Comput. Entertain., 2(2):12-12, 2004.
18. S. Pinker. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. Viking Press, New York, NY, 2002.
19. M. B. Solano. dance-tech.net. http://www.dance-tech.net/.
20. D. Stayman and D. Aaker. Continuous measurement of self-report of emotional response. Journal of Psychology and Marketing, 10(3):199-214, 1993.
21. C. Stevens, R. Glass, E. Schubert, J. Chen, and H. Winskel. Methods for measuring audience reactions. Proceedings of the inaugeral International Conference on Music Communication Science, page 155, 2007.
22. C. J. Stevens, E. Schubert, R. H. Morris, M. Frear, J. Chen, S. Healey, C. Schoknecht, and S. Hansen. Cognition and the temporal arts: Investigating audience response to dance using PDAs that record continuous data during live performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(9):800 - 813, 2009.