Learning generic skills through chemistry education

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 225-228

  Taber, Keith S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016408465     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c6rp90003h     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Collins H., (2010), Tacit and Explicit Knowledge, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
2. Dori Y. J. and Sasson I., (2013), A three-attribute transfer skills framework-part I: establishing the model and its relation to chemical education, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 14 (4), 363-375, DOI: 10.1039/C3RP20093K
3. Flynn A. B., (2014), How do students work through organic synthesis learning activities? Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 15, 747-762, DOI: 10.1039/C4RP00143E
4. Johnson S., (1989), National Assessment: The APU Science Approach, London: Assessment of Performance Unit
5. Kind V. and Taber K. S., (2005), Science: Teaching School Subjects 11-19, London: Routledge Falmer
6. Kirschner P. A., Sweller J. and Clark R. E., (2006), Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching, Educ. Psychol., 41 (2), 75-86
7. Kuhn T. S., (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago
8. Overton T. L. and Randles C. A., (2015), Beyond problem-based learning: using dynamic PBL in chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 16 (2), 251-259, DOI: 10.1039/C4RP00248B
9. Polanyi M., (1962), Personal Knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy, corrected version edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
10. Putica K. and Trivic D. D., (2016), Cognitive apprenticeship as a vehicle for enhancing the understanding and functionalization of organic chemistry knowledge, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 17 (1), 172-196, DOI: 10.1039/C5RP00179J
11. Sasson I. and Dori Y. J., (2015), A three-attribute transfer skills framework-part II: applying and assessing the model in science education, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 16 (1), 154-167, DOI: 10.1039/C4RP00120F
12. Sheardy R. D. (ed.), (2010), Science Education and Civic Engagement: The SENCER Approach, Washington DC: American Chemical Society
13. Solomon J., (1983), Learning about energy: how pupils think in two domains, Eur. J. Sci. Educ., 5 (1), 49-59, DOI: 10.1080/0140528830050105
14. Stephenson N. S. and Sadler-McKnight N. P., (2016), Developing critical thinking skills using the Science Writing Heuristic in the chemistry laboratory, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 17 (1), 72-79, DOI: 10.1039/C5RP00102A
15. Taber K. S., (1995), An analogy for discussing progression in learning chemistry, School Science Review, 76 (276), 91-95
16. Taber K. S., (1998), The sharing-out of nuclear attraction: or 'I can't think about Physics in Chemistry', Int. J. Sci. Educ., 20 (8), 1001-1014
17. Taber K. S., (2008), Towards a curricular model of the nature of science, Sci. Educ., 17 (2-3), 179-218, DOI: 10.1007/s11191-006-9056-4
18. Taber K. S., (2011), Constructivism as educational theory: contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction, in Hassaskhah J. (ed.) Educational Theory, New York: Nova, pp. 39-61, retrieved from https://camtools.cam.ac.uk/wiki/eclipse/Constructivism.html
19. Taber K. S., (2013), Three levels of chemistry educational research, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 14 (2), 151-155, DOI: 10.1039/C3RP90003G
20. Tobias S. and Duffy T. M. (ed.)., (2009), Constructivist instruction: success or failure? New York: Routledge