The role of hydrogen bonding in non-ionic polymer adsorption to cellulose nanocrystals and silica colloids

Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science

Volumn 29, Issue , 2017, Pages 76-82

  Reid, Michael S ^a   Villalobos, Marco ^b   Cranston, Emily D ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CABOT CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanocrystals; Hydrogen bonding; Non ionic polymer adsorption; Polyethylene glycol; Silica

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; BONDING; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; FOAMS; HYDROGEN; NANOCRYSTALS; POLYELECTROLYTES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYETHYLENES; POLYMERS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SILICA;

CELLULOSE NANO-CRYSTALS; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTAL (CNCS); NONIONIC POLYMERS; PETROCHEMICAL RESOURCES; POLYELECTROLYTE ADSORPTION; RENEWABLE MATERIALS; RHEOLOGICAL MODIFIERS; WATERSOLUBLE POLYMERS;

HYDROGEN BONDS;

CELLULOSE; MACROGOL; NANOCRYSTAL; POLYMER; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ADSORPTION; COLLOID; DISPERSION; HYDROGEN BOND; REVIEW; SOLUBILITY;

ADSORPTION; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; HYDROGEN BONDS; POLYELECTROLYTES; RHEOLOGY; SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 85016243701     PISSN: 13590294     EISSN: 18790399     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2017.03.005     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. [1] American Chemical Society, ACS Green Chemistry Insitute® 2016. https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/greenchemistry.html (accessed October 11, 2016).
2. [2] Mariano, M., El Kissi, N., Dufresne, A., Cellulose nanocrystals and related nanocomposites: review of some properties and challenges. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 52 (2014), 791–806, 10.1002/polb.23490.
3. [3] Salas, C., Nypelö, T., Rodriguez-Abreu, C., Carrillo, C., Rojas, O.J., Nanocellulose properties and applications in colloids and interfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 19 (2014), 383–396, 10.1016/j.cocis.2014.10.003.
4. [4] Zhu, H., Luo, W., Ciesielski, P.N., Fang, Z., Zhu, J.Y., Henriksson, G., et al. Wood-derived materials for green electronics, biological devices, and energy applications. Chem Rev 116 (2016), 9305–9374, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225.
5. [5•] Charreau, H., Foresti, M.L., Vazquez, A., Nanocellulose patents trends: a comprehensive review on patents on cellulose nanocrystals, microfibrillated and bacterial cellulose. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 7 (2013), 56–80, 10.2174/1872210511307010056.
6. [6] Nickerson, R.F., Habrle, J.A., Cellulose intercrystalline structure. Ind Eng Chem 39 (1947), 1507–1512, 10.1021/ie50455a024.
7. [7] Ranby, B., Ribi, E., Uber den Feinbau Zellulose. Experientia 6 (1950), 12–14.
8. [8] Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindström, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D.G., et al. Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50 (2011), 5438–5466, 10.1002/anie.201001273.
9. [9•] Moon, R.J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., Youngblood, J., Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40 (2011), 3941–3994, 10.1039/c0cs00108b.
10. [10] Chen, L., Zhu, J.Y., Baez, C., Kitin, P., Elder, T., Highly thermal-stable and functional cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils produced using fully recyclable organic acids. Green Chem 18 (2016), 3835–3843, 10.1039/C6GC00687F.
11. [11] Yu, H., Qin, Z., Liang, B., Liu, N., Zhou, Z., Chen, L., Facile extraction of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals with a high yield of 93% through hydrochloric acid hydrolysis under hydrothermal conditions. J Mater Chem A Mater Energy Sustain 1 (2013), 3938–3944, 10.1039/c3ta01150j.
12. [12] Novo, L.P., Bras, J., García, A., Belgacem, N., Curvelo, A.A.D.S., A study of the production of cellulose nanocrystals through subcritical water hydrolysis. Ind Crop Prod 93 (2016), 88–95, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.012.
13. [13] Reid, M.S., Villalobos, M., Cranston, E.D., Benchmarking cellulose nanocrystals: from the laboratory to industrial production. Langmuir, 2016, 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765 [acs.langmuir.6b03765].
14. [14] Future Markets Inc, The global market for Nanocellulose to 2020. 2013.
15. [15] Kalashnikova, I., Bizot, H., Cathala, B., Capron, I., Modulation of cellulose nanocrystals amphiphilic properties to stabilize oil/water interface. Biomacromolecules 13 (2012), 267–275, 10.1021/bm201599j.
16. [16] Kalashnikova, I., Bizot, H., Bertoncini, P., Cathala, B., Capron, I., Cellulosic nanorods of various aspect ratios for oil in water pickering emulsions. Soft Matter, 9, 2013, 952, 10.1039/c2sm26472b.
17. [17] Cherhal, F., Cousin, F., Capron, I., Influence of charge density and ionic strength on the aggregation process of cellulose nanocrystals in aqueous suspension, as revealed by small-angle neutron scattering. Langmuir 31 (2015), 5596–5602, 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00851.
18. [18] De France, K.J., Chan, K.J.W., Cranston, E.D., Hoare, T., Enhanced mechanical properties in cellulose nanocrystal–poly(oligoethylene glycol methacrylate) injectable nanocomposite hydrogels through control of physical and chemical cross-linking. Biomacromolecules 17 (2016), 649–660, 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01598.
19. [19] Yang, X., Bakaic, E., Hoare, T., Cranston, E.D., Injectable polysaccharide hydrogels reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: morphology, rheology, degradation, and cytotoxicity. Biomacromolecules 14 (2013), 4447–4455, 10.1021/bm401364z.
20. [20] Kelly, J.A., Shukaliak, A.M., Cheung, C.C.Y., Shopsowitz, K.E., Hamad, W.Y., MacLachlan, M.J., Responsive photonic hydrogels based on nanocrystalline cellulose. Angew Chem Int Ed 52 (2013), 8912–8916, 10.1002/anie.201302687.
21. [21] Cao, Y., Zavattieri, P., Youngblood, J., Moon, R., Weiss, J., The relationship between cellulose nanocrystal dispersion and strength. Construct Build Mater 119 (2016), 71–79, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.077.
22. [22] Cao, Y., Tian, N., Bahr, D., Zavattieri, P.D., Youngblood, J., Moon, R.J., et al. The influence of cellulose nanocrystals on the microstructure of cement paste. Cem Concr Compos 74 (2016), 164–173, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.09.008.
23. [23] Kan, K.H.M., Li, J., Wijesekera, K., Cranston, E.D., Polymer-grafted cellulose nanocrystals as pH-responsive reversible flocculants. Biomacromolecules 14 (2013), 3130–3139, 10.1021/bm400752k.
24. [24] Batmaz, R., Mohammed, N., Zaman, M., Minhas, G., Berry, R.M., Tam, K.C., Cellulose nanocrystals as promising adsorbents for the removal of cationic dyes. Cellulose 21 (2014), 1655–1665, 10.1007/s10570-014-0168-8.
25. [25] Oksman, K., Aitomäki, Y., Mathew, A.P., Siqueira, G., Zhou, Q., Butylina, S., et al. Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 83 (2016), 2–18, 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.041.
26. [26•] Habibi, Y., Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev 43 (2014), 1519–1542, 10.1039/c3cs60204d.
27. [27•] Wågberg, L., Polyelectrolyte adsorption onto cellulose fibres. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 15 (2009), 147–172, 10.1515/9783110213447.
28. [28] Hubbe, M.A., Nanko, H., McNeal, M.R., Retention aid polymer interactions with cellulosic surfaces and suspensions: a review. BioResources 4 (2009), 850–906.
29. [29] Martin, C., Jean, B., Nanocellulose/polymer multilayered thin films: tunable architectures towards tailored physical properties. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29 (2014), 19–30.
30. [30] Cranston, E.D., Gray, D.G., Polyelectrolyte multilayer films containing cellulose: a review. Roman, M., (eds.) Model Cellul. Surfaces ACS Symp. Ser., vol. 1019, 2010, ACS Publishing, Washington, DC, 95–114, 10.1021/bk-2009-1019.ch004.
31. [31•] Lindman, B., Karlström, G., Stigsson, L., On the mechanism of dissolution of cellulose. J Mol Liq 156 (2010), 76–81, 10.1016/j.molliq.2010.04.016.
32. [32••] Medronho, B., Romano, A., Miguel, M.G., Stigsson, L., Lindman, B., Rationalizing cellulose (in)solubility: reviewing basic physicochemical aspects and role of hydrophobic interactions. Cellulose 19 (2012), 581–587, 10.1007/s10570-011-9644-6.
33. [33] Glasser, W.G., Atalla, R.H., Blackwell, J., Malcolm Brown, R., Burchard, W., French, A.D., et al. About the structure of cellulose: debating the Lindman hypothesis. Cellulose 19 (2012), 589–598, 10.1007/s10570-012-9691-7.
34. [34] Peri, S., Muthukumar, L., Nazmul Karim, M., Khare, R., Dynamics of cello-oligosaccharides on a cellulose crystal surface. Cellulose 19 (2012), 1791–1806, 10.1007/s10570-012-9771-8.
35. [35] Sundman, O., Adsorption of four non-ionic cellulose derivatives on cellulose model surfaces. Cellulose 21 (2014), 115–124, 10.1007/s10570-013-0105-2.
36. [36] Eronen, P., Junka, K., Laine, J., Österberg, M., Interaction between water-soluble polysaccharides and native nanofibrillar cellulose thin films. BioResources 6 (2011), 4200–4217.
37. [37] Umemura, M., Yuguchi, Y., Hirotsu, T., Hydration at glycosidic linkages of malto- and cello-oligosaccharides in aqueous solution from molecular dynamics simulation: effect of conformational flexibility. J Mol Struct THEOCHEM 730 (2005), 1–8, 10.1016/j.theochem.2005.05.034.
38. [38] Edgar, C.D., Gray, D.G., Influence of dextran on the phase behavior of suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals. Macromolecules 35 (2002), 7400–7406, 10.1021/ma0204195.
39. [39] Beck-Candanedo, S., Viet, D., Gray, D.G., Induced phase separation in low-ionic-strength cellulose nanocrystal suspensions containing high-molecular-weight blue dextrans. Langmuir 22 (2006), 8690–8695, 10.1021/la061310j.
40. [40] Beck-Candanedo, S., Viet, D., Gray, D.G., Induced phase separation in cellulose nanocrystal suspensions containing ionic dye species. Cellulose 13 (2006), 629–635, 10.1007/s10570-006-9084-x.
41. [41] Biermann, C.J., Stock preparation and additives for papermaking. Handb. Pulping Papermak, Second, 1996, Elsevier / Academic Press, 190–208, 10.1016/B978-012097362-0/50012-1.
42. [42] Villares, A., Moreau, C., Dammak, A., Capron, I., Cathala, B., Kinetic aspects of the adsorption of xyloglucan onto cellulose nanocrystals. Soft Matter 11 (2015), 6472–6481, 10.1039/C5SM01413A.
43. [43] Hu, Z., Cranston, E.D., Ng, R., Pelton, R., Tuning cellulose nanocrystal gelation with polysaccharides and surfactants. Langmuir 30 (2014), 2684–2692, 10.1021/la404977t.
44. [44] Boluk, Y., Zhao, L., Incani, V., Dispersions of nanocrystalline cellulose in aqueous polymer solutions: structure formation of colloidal rods. Langmuir 28 (2012), 6114–6123, 10.1021/la2035449.
45. [45] Kargl, R., Mohan, T., Bračič, M., Kulterer, M., Doliška, A., Stana-Kleinschek, K., et al. Adsorption of carboxymethyl cellulose on polymer surfaces: evidence of a specific interaction with cellulose. Langmuir 28 (2012), 11440–11447, 10.1021/la302110a.
46. [46] Lopez, M., Bizot, H., Chambat, G., Marais, M., Zykwinska, A., Ralet, M., et al. Enthalpic studies of xyloglucan − cellulose interactions. Biomacromolecules 11 (2010), 1417–1428, 10.1021/bm1002762.
47. [47] Zhao, Z., Crespi, V.H., Kubicki, J.D., Cosgrove, D.J., Zhong, L., Molecular dynamics simulation study of xyloglucan adsorption on cellulose surfaces: effects of surface hydrophobicity and side-chain variation. Cellulose 21 (2014), 1025–1039, 10.1007/s10570-013-0041-1.
48. [48] Zhang, Q., Brumer, H., Ågren, H., Tu, Y., The adsorption of xyloglucan on cellulose: effects of explicit water and side chain variation. Carbohydr Res 346 (2011), 2595–2602, 10.1016/j.carres.2011.09.007.
49. [49] Benselfelt, T., Cranston, E.D., Ondaral, S., Johansson, E., Brumer, H., Rutland, M.W., et al. Adsorption of xyloglucan onto cellulose surfaces of different morphologies: an entropy-driven process. Biomacromolecules 17 (2016), 2801–2811, 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00561.
50. [50•] Bouchard, J., Méthot, M., Fraschini, C., Beck, S., Effect of oligosaccharide deposition on the surface of cellulose nanocrystals as a function of acid hydrolysis temperature. Cellulose, 2016, 10.1007/s10570-016-1036-5.
51. [51] Beck, S., Bouchard, J., Berry, R., Controlling the reflection wavelength of iridescent solid films of nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 12 (2011), 167–172, 10.1021/bm1010905.
52. [52] Shafiei-Sabet, S., Hamad, W.Y., Hatzikiriakos, S.G., Rheology of nanocrystalline cellulose aqueous suspensions. Langmuir 28 (2012), 17124–17133, 10.1021/la303380v.
53. [53] Knop, K., Hoogenboom, R., Fischer, D., Schubert, U.S., Poly(ethylene glycol) in drug delivery: pros and cons as well as potential alternatives. Angew Chem Int Ed 49 (2010), 6288–6308, 10.1002/anie.200902672.
54. [54] Graham, N.B., Zulfiqar, M., Chemistry, A., Interaction of poly (ethylene oxide) with solvents: 2. Water-poly(ethylene glycol). Polymer (Guildf) 30 (1988), 528–533.
55. [55] Huang, L., Nishinari, K., Interaction between poly(ethylene glycol) and water as studied by differential scanning calorimetry. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 39 (2001), 496–506, 10.1002/1099-0488(20010301)39:5<496::AID-POLB1023>3.0.CO;2-H.
56. [56] Laine, J., Lindström, T., Glad-Nordmark, G., Risinger, G., Studies on topochemical modification of cellulosic fibres. Part 1. Chemical conditions for the attachment of carboxymethyl cellulose onto fibres. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 15 (2000), 520–526, 10.3183/NPPRJ-2000-15-05-p520-526.
57. [57] Xu, X., Wang, H., Jiang, L., Wang, X., Payne, S.A., Zhu, J.Y., et al. Comparison between cellulose nanocrystal and cellulose nanofibril reinforced poly(ethylene oxide) nanofibers and their novel shish-kebab-like crystalline structures. Macromolecules 47 (2014), 3409–3416, 10.1021/ma402627j.
58. [58] Xu, X., Liu, F., Jiang, L., Zhu, J.Y., Haagenson, D., Wiesenborn, D.P., Cellulose nanocrystals vs. cellulose nanofibrils: a comparative study on their microstructures and effects as polymer reinforcing agents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5 (2013), 2999–3009, 10.1021/am302624t.
59. [59] Cheng, D., Wen, Y., Wang, L., An, X., Zhu, X., Ni, Y., Adsorption of polyethylene glycol (PEG) onto cellulose nano-crystals to improve its dispersity. Carbohydr Polym 123 (2015), 157–163, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.035.
60. [60] Bardet, R., Belgacem, N., Bras, J., Flexibility and color monitoring of cellulose nanocrystal iridescent solid films using anionic or neutral polymers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7 (2015), 4010–4018, 10.1021/am506786t.
61. [61] Oguzlu, H., Boluk, Y., Interactions between cellulose nanocrystals and anionic and neutral polymers in aqueous solutions. Cellulose, 2016, 1–16, 10.1007/s10570-016-1096-6.
62. [62] Changsarn, S., Mendez, J.D., Shanmuganathan, K., Foster, E.J., Weder, C., Supaphol, P., Biologically inspired hierarchical design of nanocomposites based on poly(ethylene oxide) and cellulose nanofibers. Macromol Rapid Commun 32 (2011), 1367–1372, 10.1002/marc.201100183.
63. [63] Holappa, S., Kontturi, K.S., Salminen, A., Seppälä, J., Laine, J., Adsorption of hydrophobically end-capped poly(ethylene glycol) on cellulose. Langmuir 29 (2013), 13750–13759, 10.1021/la402494m.
64. [64] Li, Y., Liu, H., Song, J., Rojas, O.J., Hinestroza, J.P., Adsorption and association of a symmetric PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer on polypropylene, polyethylene, and cellulose surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3 (2011), 2349–2357, 10.1021/am200264r.
65. [65] Mazeau, K., Rivet, A., Wetting the (110) and (100) surfaces of Iβ cellulose studied by molecular dynamics. Biomacromolecules 9 (2008), 1352–1354, 10.1021/bm7013872.
66. [66] Pelton RH, Allen LH, Nuget HM. Additives for increased retention and pitch control in paper manufacture. US 4,313,790, 1982.
67. [67] Lindström, T., Glad-Nordmark, G., Flocculation of latex and cellulose dispersions by means of transient polymer networks. Colloids Surf 8 (1984), 337–351, 10.1016/0166-6622(84)80128-6.
68. [68] Lindström, T., Glad-Nordmark, G., Selective adsorption, flocculation, and fractionation of wood pulps with polyethyleneoxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 94 (1983), 404–411, 10.1016/0021-9797(83)90280-1.
69. [69] Abdallah Qasaimeh, M.R., Causes of transient flocculation of fines with polyethylene oxide and a cofactor: implications for mill performance. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 386 (2011), 125–130, 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.07.008.
70. [70] Qasaimeh, M.R.A., Qasaimeh, A., Hani, F.B., Factors affecting fines flocculation performance with cofactor-polyethylene oxide. Adv Chem Eng Sci 4 (2014), 49–55, 10.4236/aces.2014.41007.
71. [71] Utsuno, K., Uludaǧ, H., Thermodynamics of polyethylenimine-DNA binding and DNA condensation. Biophys J 99 (2010), 201–207, 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.016.
72. [72] Cabot Corporation, Hydrophilic fumed silica. http://www.cabotcorp.com/solutions/products-plus/fumed-metal-oxides/hydrophilic, 2016 [accessed October 11, 2016].
73. [73•] Hyde, E.D.E.R., Seyfaee, A., Neville, F., Moreno-Atanasio, R., Colloidal silica particle synthesis and future industrial manufacturing pathways: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 55 (2016), 8891–8913, 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01839.
74. [74] Asadi, A., Miller, M., Sultana, S., Moon, R.J., Kalaitzidou, K., Introducing cellulose nanocrystals in sheet molding compounds (SMC). Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 88 (2016), 206–215, 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.033.
75. [75] Villalpando-Páez, F., Nguyen, L., Abitbol, T., Komarov, A., Prevo, B.G., Corwin, J., et al. Comparison of nanocrystalline cellulose and fumed silica in latex coatings. Green Mater 2 (2014), 206–221, 10.1680/gmat.14.00017.
76. [76] Reid, M.S., Marway, H.S., Moran-Hidalgo, C., Villalobos, M., Cranston, E.D., Will it stick? Polyethylene glycol adsorption to fumed silica versus nanocellulose. Soft Matter, 2017 [Submitted SM-ART-02-2017-000283].
77. [77•] Rubio, J., Kitchener, J., The mechanism of adsorption of poly(ethylene oxide) flocculant on silica. J Colloid Interface Sci 57 (1976), 132–142, 10.1016/0021-9797(76)90182-X.
78. 2 Nanospheres in poly(ethylene oxide). Nano Lett 16 (2016), 459–465, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04117.
79. [79] Qiao, X.G., Dugas, P.-Y., Charleux, B., Lansalot, M., Bourgeat-Lami, E., Synthesis of multipod-like silica/polymer latex particles via nitroxide-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Macromolecules 48 (2015), 545–556, 10.1021/ma5019473.
80. [80] Ma, K., Zhang, D., Cong, Y., Wiesner, U., Elucidating the mechanism of silica nanoparticle PEGylation processes using fluorescence correlation spectroscopies. Chem Mater 28 (2016), 1537–1545, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00030.
81. [81] Bouchoucha, M., C.-Gaudreault, R., Fortin, M., Kleitz, F., Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: selective surface functionalization for optimal relaxometric and drug loading performances. Adv Funct Mater 24 (2014), 5911–5923, 10.1002/adfm.201400524.
82. [82] Han, N., Zhao, Q., Wan, L., Wang, Y., Gao, Y., Wang, P., et al. Hybrid lipid-capped mesoporous silica for stimuli-Responsive drug release and overcoming multidrug resistance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7 (2015), 3342–3351, 10.1021/am5082793.
83. [83••] Mathur, S., Moudgil, B.M., Adsorption mechanism(s) of poly(ethylene oxide) on oxide surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 196 (1997), 92–98, 10.1006/jcis.1997.5192.
84. [84] Voronin, E.F., Gun'ko, V.M., Guzenko, N.V., Pakhlov, E.M., Nosach, L.V., Leboda, R., et al. Interaction of poly(ethylene oxide) with fumed silica. J Colloid Interface Sci 279 (2004), 326–340, 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.06.073.
85. [85] Derkaoui, N., Said, S., Grohens, Y., Olier, R., Privat, M., Polyethylene glycol adsorption on silica: from bulk phase behavior to surface phase diagram. Langmuir 23 (2007), 6631–6637, 10.1021/la070199u.
86. [86] Klonos, P., Pissis, P., Gun'ko, V.M., Kyritsis, A., Guzenko, N.V., Pakhlov, E.M., et al. Interaction of poly(ethylene glycol) with fumed silica and alumina/silica/titania. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 360 (2010), 220–231, 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.03.002.
87. [87] Kim, S.Y., Schweizer, K.S., Zukoski, C.F., Multiscale structure, interfacial cohesion, adsorbed layers, and thermodynamics in dense polymer-nanoparticle mixtures. Phys Rev Lett, 107, 2011, 225504, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.225504.
88. [88••] Kim, S.Y., Meyer, H.W., Saalwächter, K., Zukoski, C.F., Polymer dynamics in PEG-silica nanocomposites: effects of polymer molecular weight, temperature and solvent dilution. Macromolecules 45 (2012), 4225–4237, 10.1021/ma300439k.
89. [89] Kim, S.Y., Hall, L.M., Schweizer, K.S., Zukoski, C.F., Long wavelength concentration fluctuations and cage scale ordering of nanoparticles in concentrated polymer solutions. Macromolecules 43 (2010), 10123–10131, 10.1021/ma1021677.
90. [90] Van Heiningen, J.A., Hill, R.J., Poly(ethylene oxide) adsorption onto and desorption from silica microspheres: new insights from optical tweezers electrophoresis. Macromolecules 44 (2011), 8245–8260, 10.1021/ma2003486.
91. [91] Hasanzadeh, M., Mottaghitalab, V., Rezaei, M., Rheological and viscoelastic behavior of concentrated colloidal suspensions of silica nanoparticles: a response surface methodology approach. Adv Powder Technol 26 (2015), 1570–1577, 10.1016/j.apt.2015.08.011.
92. [92] Khandavalli, S., Rothstein, J.P., Extensional rheology of shear-thickening fumed silica nanoparticles dispersed in an aqueous polyethylene oxide solution. J Rheol (N Y N Y) 58 (2014), 411–431, 10.1122/1.4864620.
93. [93] Raghavan, S.R., Walls, H.J., Khan, S.A., Rheology of silica dispersions in organic liquids: new evidence for solvation forces dictated by hydrogen bonding. Langmuir 16 (2000), 7920–7930, 10.1021/la991548q.
94. [94] Zhang, Q., Archer, L.A., Poly(ethylene oxide)/silica nanocomposites: structure and rheology. Langmuir 18 (2002), 10435–10442, 10.1021/la026338j.
95. [95] Leung, K., Nielsen, I., Criscenti, L., Elucidating the bimodal acid–base behavior of the water–silica interface from first principles. J Am Chem Soc 131 (2009), 18358–18365, 10.1021/ja906190t.
96. [96] Bhattacharyya, L., Rohrer, J.S., (eds.) Applications of ion chromatography for pharmaceutical and biological products, 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 10.1002/9781118147009.
97. [97] West, R., Baney, R.H., Hydrogen bonding studies. II. The acidity and basicity of silanols compared to alcohols. J Am Chem Soc 81 (1959), 6145–6148, 10.1021/ja01532a011.
98. [98] Reid, M.S., Villalobos, M., Cranston, E.D., Cellulose nanocrystal interactions probed by thin film swelling to predict dispersibility. Nanoscale 8 (2016), 12247–12257, 10.1039/C6NR01737A.
99. [99] Niinivaara, E., Faustini, M., Tammelin, T., Kontturi, E., Water vapor uptake of ultrathin films of biologically derived nanocrystals: quantitative assessment with quartz crystal microbalance and spectroscopic ellipsometry. Langmuir 31 (2015), 12170–12176, 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01763.
100. [100] Madathingal, R.R., Wunder, S.L., Confinement effects of silica nanoparticles with radii smaller and larger than Rg of adsorbed poly(ethylene oxide). Macromolecules 44 (2011), 2873–2882, 10.1021/ma1021693.