Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark

Journal of Medical Screening

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 20-26

  Jacobsen, Katja Kemp ^a   Chelpin, My von Euler ^a   Vejborg, Ilse ^b   Lynge, Elsebeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Mental Health Center Glostrup   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Attendance; Breast cancer; Mammography; Mass screening; Protective effect

Indexed keywords

AGED; BREAST TUMOR; CITY; COHORT ANALYSIS; DENMARK; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROCEDURES; REMINDER SYSTEM; UTILIZATION;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CITIES; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DENMARK; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REMINDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 85016185525     PISSN: 09691413     EISSN: 14755793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0969141316641982     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Perry N, Broeders M, de WC, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 614–622.
2. Giordano L, von KL, Tomatis M, et al. Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation. J Med Screen 2012; 19: 72–82.
3. Domingo L, Jacobsen KK, von Euler-Chelpin M, et al. Seventeen-years overview of breast cancer inside and outside screening in Denmark. Acta Oncol 2013; 52: 48–56.
4. von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, et al. Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer 2008; 122: 418–423.
5. Jacobsen KK and von Euler-Chelpin M. Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012; 34: 272–278.
6. Jensen A, Olsen AH, von Euler-Chelpin M, et al. Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere? Int J Cancer 2005; 113: 464–470.
7. Denhaerynck K, Lesaffre E, Baele J, et al. Mammography screening attendance: meta-analysis of the effect of direct-contact invitation. Am J Prev Med 2003; 25: 195–203.
8. Giordano L, Stefanini V, Senore C, et al. The impact of different communication and organizational strategies on mammography screening uptake in women aged 40–45 years. Eur J Public Health 2012; 22: 413–418.
9. Goelen G, De CG and Hanssens S. A community peer-volunteer telephone reminder call to increase breast cancer-screening attendance. Oncol Nurs Forum 2010; 37: E312–E317.
10. Hegenscheid K, Hoffmann W, Fochler S, et al. Telephone counseling and attendance in a national mammography-screening program a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 2011; 41: 421–427.
11. Klabunde CN, Sancho-Garnier H, Broeders M, et al. Quality assurance for screening mammography data collection systems in 22 countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001; 17: 528–541.
12. Olsen AH, Njor SH, Vejborg I, et al. Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study. BMJ 2005; 330: 220.