Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening

Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 272-278

  Jacobsen, Katja Kemp ^a   Von Euler Chelpin, My ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

cancer; health services; screening

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DENMARK; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; REGISTER; STATISTICS;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84861408195     PISSN: 17413842     EISSN: 17413850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr106     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. European Commission. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 4th edn. Luxembourg: European Communities, 2008,17-56.
2. Von Euler-Chelpin M. Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer 2008;122:418-23.
3. Yankaskas BC, Klabunde CN, Ancelle-Park R et al. International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: Can it be done? J Med Screen 2004;11:187-93.
4. Fracheboud J, De Koning HJ, Beemsterboer P et al. J. Nation-wide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: Results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Cancer 1998;75:694-98.
5. Sarkeala T, Anttila A, Forsman H et al. Process indicators from ten centres in the Finnish breast cancer screening programme from 1991 to 2000. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:2116-25.
6. Bennett RL, Blanks RG, Moss SM. Coverage in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme, 1996-2005: Correcting for the first invitation of women between 50 and 52 years. J Public Health (Oxf) 2008;30:167-70.
7. Breen N, Cronin A, Meissner HI et al. Reported drop in mammography: Is this cause for concern? Cancer 2007;109:2405-9.
8. Shields M, Wilkins K. An update on mammography use in Canada. Health Rep 2009;20:7-19.
9. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. BreastScreen Australia Monitoring Report 2005-2006. Canbarra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2009,8-23.
10. Sarkeala T, Anttila A, Saarenmaa I et al. Validity of process indicators of screening for breast cancer to predict mortality reduction. J Med Screen 2005;12:33-7.
11. Autier P, Shannoun F, Scharpantgen A et al. A breast cancer screening programme operating in a liberal health care system: The Luxembourg Mammography Programme, 1992-1997. Int J Cancer 2002;97:828-32.
12. Bennett RL, Blanks RG, Patnick J et al. Results from the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme 2000-05. J Med Screen 2007;14:200-4.
13. Fracheboud J, De Koning HJ, Boer R et al. Nationwide breast cancer screening programme fully implemented in The Netherlands. Breast 2001;10:6-11.
14. Giorgi D, Giordano L, Ventura L et al. Mammography screening in Italy: 2007 survey. Epidemiol Prev 2009;33:13-28.
15. Kalager M, Zelen M, Langmark F et al. Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1203-10.
16. Lidbrink EK, Tornberg SA, Azavedo EM et al. The general mammography screening program in Stockholm. Organisation and firstround results. Acta Oncol 1994;33:353-8.
17. French National Institute of Public Health Surveillance (institut de Veille sanitaire). http://www.invs.sante.fr/surveillance/cancers/default.htm (11 November 2010, date last accessed).
18. Broeders MJ, Scharpantgen A, Ascunce N et al. Comparison of early performance indicators for screening projects within the European Breast Cancer Network: 1989-2000. Eur J Cancer Prev 2005;14:107-16.
19. Dowling EC, Klabunde C, Patnick J et al. Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries. J Med Screen 2010;17:139-46.