Anaphoric dependencies: How are they encoded? Towards a derivation-based typology

Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Typological Explorations

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 499-556

  Reuland, Eric ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016109590     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Anagnostopoulou, Elena and Martin Everaert 1999 Toward amore complete typology of anaphoric expressions. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 97-119
2. Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown and Greville Corbett 2002 The Surrey Syncretisms Database. . Accessed on March 25, 2005
3. Baker, Mark 1996 The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press
4. Baker, Mark 2001 The Atoms of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules of Grammar. New York: Basic Books
5. Benveniste, Emile 1966 Problemes de linguistique generale. Paris: Gallimard
6. Bergeton, Uffe 2004 The Independence of Binding and Intensification. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California. Los Angeles
7. Bonet, Eulalia 1991 Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. Distributed by MITWPL
8. Burzio, Luigi 1991 The Morphological Basis of Anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27.1: 1-60
9. Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris
10. Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin and Use. Praeger: New York
11. Chomsky, Noam 1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
12. Chomsky, Noam 2001 Derivation by Phase. In: Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
13. Chomsky, Noam 2004 Beyond ExplanatoryAdequacy. In: Belletti, Adriana (ed.), Structures and Beyond-TheCartography of Syntactic Structure, Vol 3, 104-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press
14. Dalrymple, Mary, Makoto Kanazawa, Sam Mchombo and Stanley Peters 1994 What do reciprocals mean? In: Harvey, M. and L. Santelman (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, SALT4, 61-87
15. Dalrymple, Mary, MakotoKanazawa, Yookyung Kim, SamMchombo and Stanley Peters 1998 Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 159-210
16. Dimitriadis, Alexis 2000 Beyond identity: Topics in pronominal and reciprocal anaphora. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania
17. Everaert, Martin 2003 Reflexives in discourse. In:Koster, Jan andHenk vanRiemsdijk (eds.), Germania et Alia. AWebschrift for Hans den Besten. http://odur.let.rug.nl/~koster/DenBesten
18. Faltz, Leonard 1977 Reflexivization:A Study in Universal Syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley
19. Frampton, John 2002 Syncretism, Impoverishment, and the Structure of Person Features. In: Andronis, M., E. Debenport, A. Pycha and K. Yoshimura (eds.), Papers from the 2002 Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting, Vol. 38, 207-222
20. Friederici, Angela 2002 Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6.2: 78-84
21. Harley, Heidi and Elizabeth Ritter 2002 Person and number in pronouns: A feature geometric analysis. Language 78: 482-526
22. Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik and Robert May 1991 Reciprocity and Plurality. Linguistic Inquiry 22.1: 63-103
23. Helke, Michael 1973 On reflexives in English. Linguistics 106: 5-23
24. Hellan, Lars 1988 Anaphora in Norwegian and theTheory ofGrammar.Dordrecht: Foris
25. Higginbotham, James 1983 Logical Form, Binding and Nominals. Linguistic Inquiry 14.3: 395-421
26. Hoekstra, Jarich 1994 Pronouns and Case: On the distribution of Frisian harren and se 'them'. Leuvense Bijdragen 83: 47-65
27. Hoop, Helen de 1992 Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. Doctoral Dissertation, Groningen University
28. Jackendoff, Ray 1992 Mme.Tussaudmeets the BindingTheory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 1-33
29. Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A. 1997 Anaphors as Pronouns. Studia Linguistica 51.2: 186-234
30. Keenan, Edward 1988 On Semantics and the Binding Theory. In: Hawkins, J. (ed.), Explaining Language Universals, 105-144. Oxford: Blackwell
31. Keller, Rudolf Ernst 1961 German Dialects: Phonology and Morphology. Manchester:Manchester University Press
32. Keller, Rudolf Ernst 1987 The German Language. London: Faber and Faber
33. Konig, Ekkehard and Peter Siemund 2000 Intensifiers and Reflexives:ATypological Perspective. In: Frajzyngier, Zygmunt and Traci Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and Functions, 41-74. Amsterdam: Benjamins
34. Lidz, Jeffrey 1995 Morphological ReflexiveMarking: Evidence from Kannada. Linguistic Inquiry 26.4: 705-710
35. Papangeli, Dimitra 2004 The Morphosyntax of Argument Realization: Greek Argument Structure and the Lexicon-Syntax Interface. Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht, LOT
36. Pesetsky, David and Esther Torrego 2004 The Syntax ofValuation and the Interpretability of Features.Ms.MIT and UMass/Boston. http://web.mit.edu/linguistics/www/pesetsky/ Pesetsky Torrego Agree paper.pdf
37. Pica, Pierre 1987 On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle. NELS 17: 483-499
38. Pica, Pierre 1991 On the interaction between antecedent-government and binding: the case of long-distance reflexivization. In: Koster, Jan and Eric Reuland (eds.), Long Distance Anaphora, 119-135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
39. Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag 1992 Anaphors in English and the scope of the Binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 261-305
40. Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag 1994 Head DrivenPhrase Structure Grammar. Stanford andChicago:CSLI Publications and University of Chicago Press
41. Postma, Gertjan 2004 Structurele tendensen in de opkomst van het reflexief pronomen 'zich' in het 15deeeuwse Drenthe en de Theorie van Reflexiviteit. Nederlandse Taalkunde 9.2: 144-168
42. Reinhart, Tanya 1998 Wh-in-situ in the framework of the minimalist program. Natural Language Semantics 6: 29-56
43. Reinhart, Tanya 2000 Strategies of Anaphora Resolution. In: Bennis, Hans, Martin Everaert and Eric Reuland (eds.), Interface Strategies, 295-325. Amsterdam: Royal Academy of Sciences
44. Reinhart, Tanya 2002 The Theta System-an Overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28.3: 229-290
45. Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland 1991 Anaphors and Logophors: An Argument Structure Perspective. In: Koster, Jan and Eric Reuland (eds.), Long Distance Anaphora, 283-321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
46. Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland 1993 Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry: 24.4: 657-720
47. Reinhart, Tanya and Tal Siloni 2005 The Lexicon-Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations. Linguistic Inquiry: 389-436
48. Reuland, Eric 2000 Anaphors, logophors and binding. In: Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon and C.-T. James Huang (eds.), Long-Distance Reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33, 343-370. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
49. Reuland, Eric 2001 Primitives of Binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32.2: 439-492
50. Reuland, Eric 2005a Agreeing to bind. In: Broekhuis, Hans, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz and JanKoster (eds.), Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, 505-513. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
51. Reuland, Eric 2005b Long Distance Anaphors in Germanic Languages. In: Everaert, M. and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. III, 85-108. Oxford: Blackwell
52. Reuland, Eric 2006 Gradedness: interpretive dependencies and beyond. In: Fanselow, Gisbert, Caroline Fery, Matthias Schlesewsky and RalfVogel (eds.), Gradience in Grammar. Generative Perspectives, 45-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press
53. Reuland, Eric and Tanya Reinhart 1995 Pronouns, Anaphors and Case. In: Haider, Hubert, Susan Olsen and Sten Vikner (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, 241-269. Dordrecht: Kluwer
54. Schladt, Mathias 2000 The typology and grammaticalization of reflexives. In: Frajzyngier, Zygmunt andTraci Curl (eds.), Reflexives:Forms and Functions, 103-124. Amsterdam: Benjamins
55. Toldova, Svetlana 1996 Materialy k voprosu o povedenii mestoimenijawuz v caxskom dialekte caxurskogo jazyka. Unpublished Ms. Moskva
56. van Gelderen, Elly 2000 A History of English Reflexive Pronouns: Person, Self, and Interpretability. Amsterdam: Benjamins
57. Vinokurova, Nadezhda 2005 Lexical Categories and Argument Structure: A study with reference to Sakha. Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht, LOT
58. Winter, Yoad 2001 Plural Predication and the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis. Journal of Semantics 18: 333-365
59. Zribi-Hertz, Anne 1989 A-type binding and narrative point of view. Language 65: 695-727
60. Zwarts, Joost 1992 X' Syntax-X' Semantics: On the Interpretation of Lexical and Functional Heads. Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht University