Remarks and replies: Toward a more complete typology of anaphoric expressions

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 97-119

  Anagnostopoulou, Elena ^a   Everaert, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binding; Chain formation; Greek; Inalienable possession; Incorporation; Reflexivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 2642562802     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/002438999553977     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
2. Anagnostopoulou, Elena. To appear. On experiencers. In Current issues in Modern Greek syntax, ed. Artemis Alexiadou, Geoffrey Horrocks, and Melita Stavrou. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Anagnostopoulou, Elena, and Martin Everaert. 1995. How exceptional are nominative anaphors? A case study of Greek. In Actes du Deuxième Colloque de Langues & Grammaire, ed. Léa Nash, George Tsoulas, and Anne Zribi-Hertz, 19-32. Department of Language Sciences, University of Paris 8.
4. Baker, Mark. 1998. Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Baker, Mark. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme based morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7. Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6:291-352.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
9. Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann, 506-569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
10. Delfitto, Denis, and Yves D'Hulst. 1995. On possessive pronouns. Ms., Utrecht University and Antwerp University.
11. Everaert, Martin. 1986. The syntax of reflexivization, Dordrecht: Foris.
12. Fox, Danny. 1993. Chain and binding: A modification of Reinhart and Reuland's "Reflexivity." Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
13. Grodzinsky, Yosef, and Tanya Reinhart. 1993. The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24:69-101.
14. Hale, Ken. 1989. Subject obviation, switch reference, and control. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
15. Hale, Ken, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1991. On the syntax of argument structure. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
16. Heike, Michael. 1979. The grammar of English reflexives. New York: Garland.
17. Hoop, Helen de. 1992. Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
18. Iatridou, Sabine. 1988. Clitics, anaphors, and a problem of coindexation. Linguistic Inquiry 19:698-703.
19. Iatridou, Sabine, and David Embick. 1997. Apropos pro. Language 73:58-79.
20. Ingria, Robert. 1982. Why English reflexives are pronouns, or, Ingria contra Heike. In MIT working papers in linguistics 4: Papers in syntax, 55-79. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
21. Jeanne, LaVerne Masayesva. 1978. Aspects of Hopi grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
22. Joseph, Brian. 1979. On the agreement of reflexive forms in English. Linguistics 17:519-523.
23. Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
24. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
25. Keenan, Edward. 1988. On semantics and the binding theory. In Explaining language universals, ed. John Hawkins, 105-145. Oxford: Blackwell.
26. Keyser, Samuel Jay, and Thomas Roeper. 1992. Re: The abstract clitic hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 89-125.
27. Lidz, Jeffrey. 1995. Morphological reflexive marking: Evidence from Kannada. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 705-710.
28. Markantonatou, Stella. 1994. Diptota rimata: Mia lexiko-simasiologiki proseggisi (Ditransitive verbs: A lexico-semantic approach). In Studies in Greek linguistics 15: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics, University of Thessaloniki. Thessaloniki.
29. Pesetsky, David. 1985. Morphology and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 16:193-246.
30. Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
31. Philip, William, and Peter Coopmans. 1996. The role of referentiality in the acquisition of pronominal anaphora. In NELS 26, 241-255. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
32. Pica, Pierre. 1987. On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In Proceedings of NELS 17, 483-499. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
33. Pollard, Carl, and Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. [Distributed by University of Chicago Press.]
34. Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
35. Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1991. Anaphors and logophors: An argument structure perspective. In Long-distance anaphora, ed. Jan Koster and Eric Reuland, 283-334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24:657-720.
37. Reuland, Eric. 1996. Pronouns and features. In NELS 26, 319-333. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
38. Reuland, Eric, and Tanya Reinhart. 1995. Pronouns, anaphors and Case. In Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, ed. Hubert Haider, Susan Olsen, and Sten Vikner, 241-268. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
39. Roberts, Ian. 1991. Excorporation and minimality. Linguistic Inquiry 22:209-218.
40. Safir, Ken. 1995. Abstract incorporation vs. abstract cliticization. In CLS 31. Vol. 2, The Parasession on Clitics, 280-299. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
41. Safir, Ken. 1996. Semantic atoms of anaphora. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14:545-589.
42. Sanchez, Liliane. 1996. On the interpretation of intensified DPs and emphatic pronouns. Ms., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
43. Stowell, Tim. 1996. Tense and article omission in abbreviated English. Ms., UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.
44. Suñer, Margarita. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6:391-434.
45. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta. 1992. The definite determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and in English. Linguistic Inquiry 23:595-652.