Is there a relationship of operator and center volume with access site-related outcomes?

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2016, Pages

  Hulme, William ^a   Sperrin, Matthew ^a   Rushton, Helen ^a   Ludman, Peter F ^b   De Belder, Mark ^c   Curzen, Nick ^d   Kinnaird, Tim ^e   Kwok, Chun Shing ^f,g   Buchan, Iain ^a   Nolan, James ^f,g   Mamas, Mamas A ^a,f,g,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

^f Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF NORTH MIDLANDS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^h KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

hemorrhage; mortality; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; risk reduction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENGLAND; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATOR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ARTERY; RISK REDUCTION; VASCULAR ACCESS; WALES; WORK EXPERIENCE; HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RISK; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

AGED; FEMALE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RISK; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85016098348     PISSN: 19417640     EISSN: 19417632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003333     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, Neyses L, Fraser DG, de Belder M, Ludman PF, Nolan J, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013 6 698 706. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.011.
2. Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, Jolly SS, Rodés-Cabau J, Larose E, Costerousse O, Hamon M, Mann T, Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010 3 1022 1031. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.013.
3. Ratib K, Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Bhatia G, Routledge H, De Belder M, Ludman PF, Fraser D, Nolan J, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015 8 1 pt A 20 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.026.
4. Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Ratib K, Routledge H, Neyses L, Fraser DG, Buchan I, de Belder MA, Ludman P, Nolan J, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society; National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible? Am Heart J 2014 167 900 908.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.007.
5. Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Carr M, Ratib K, Buchan I, Sirker A, Fraser DG, Hildick-Smith D, de Belder M, Ludman PF, Nolan J, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society; National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 64 1554 1564. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.075.
6. Baklanov DV, Kaltenbach LA, Marso SP, Subherwal SS, Feldman DN, Garratt KN, Curtis JP, Messenger JC, Rao SV, The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013 61 420 426. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.032.
7. Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Rao SV, Cheema AN, Steg PG, Cantor WJ, Džavík V, Budaj A, Rokoss M, Valentin V, Gao P, Yusuf S, RIVAL Investigators Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012 60 2490 2499. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050.
8. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Borghi A, Di Russo C, Moretti C, Agostoni P, Loschiavo P, Lioy E, Sheiban I, Sangiorgi G, Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012 60 2481 2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017.
9. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, Klinke WP, Carere RG, Pi D, Berry B, Hilton JD, Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (mortality benefit of reduced transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the arm or leg). Heart 2008 94 1019 1025. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.136390.
10. Hess CN, Peterson ED, Neely ML, Dai D, Hillegass WB, Krucoff MW, Kutcher MA, Messenger JC, Pancholy S, Piana RN, Rao SV, The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation 2014 129 2277 2286. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006356.
11. Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS, Hong T, Kutryk MJ, Graham JJ, Fam NP, Chisholm RJ, Cheema AN, Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011 4 336 341. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.960864.
12. Badheka AO, Patel NJ, Grover P, Singh V, Patel N, Arora S, Chothani A, Mehta K, Deshmukh A, Savani GT, Patel A, Panaich SS, Shah N, Rathod A, Brown M, Mohamad T, Makkar RR, Schreiber T, Grines CL, Rihal CS, Cohen MG, Impact of annual operator and institutional volume on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: a 5-year United States experience (2005-2009). Circulation 2014 130 1392 1406
13. Strom JB, Wimmer NJ, Wasfy JH, Kennedy K, Yeh RW, Association between operator procedure volume and patient outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014 7 560 566. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000884.
14. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemelä M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR, RIVAL trial group Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011 377 1409 1420. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2.
15. Jolly SS, Cairns J, Yusuf S, Niemela K, Steg PG, Worthley M, Ferrari E, Cantor WJ, Fung A, Valettas N, Rokoss M, Olivecrona GK, Widimsky P, Cheema AN, Gao P, Mehta SR, RIVAL Investigators Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 63 954 963. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.052.
16. Gutierrez A, Tsai TT, Stanislawski MA, Vidovich M, Bryson CL, Bhatt DL, Grunwald GK, Rumsfeld J, Rao SV, Adoption of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes according to center radial volume in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare system: insights from the Veterans Affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking (CART) program. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013 6 336 346. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000110.
17. Ludman PF, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry for audit and quality assessment of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United Kingdom. Heart 2011 97 1293 1297. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300299.
18. Mamas MA, Anderson SG, O'Kane PD, Keavney B, Nolan J, Oldroyd KG, Perera D, Redwood S, Zaman A, Ludman PF, de Belder MA, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Impact of left ventricular function in relation to procedural outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. Eur Heart J 2014 35 3004 3012. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu303.
19. Kwok CS, Anderson SG, McAllister KS, Sperrin M, O'Kane PD, Keavney B, Nolan J, Myint PK, Zaman A, Buchan I, Ludman PF, de Belder MA, Mamas MA, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Impact of age on the prognostic value of left ventricular function in relation to procedural outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015 85 944 951. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25732.
20. Little RJ, Rubin DBR, Statistical Analysis With Missing Data 2002 2nd ed New York, NY Wiley
21. von Hippel PT, Regression with missing Ys: an improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociol Methodol 2015 37 83 117
22. Durrleman S, Simon R, Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 1989 8 551 561
23. R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2015. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria
24. van Burren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K, MICE: Multivariable imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 2011 45 1 67
25. Iqbal MB, Arujuna A, Ilsley C, Archbold A, Crake T, Firoozi S, Kalra S, Knight C, Lim P, Malik IS, Mathur A, Meier P, Rakhit RD, Redwood S, Whitbread M, Bromage D, Rathod K, Wragg A, MacCarthy P, Dalby M, London Heart Attack Centre (HAC) Group Investigators Radial versus femoral access is associated with reduced complications and mortality in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: an observational cohort study of 10,095 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014 7 456 464. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001314.
26. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, Rubartelli P, Briguori C, Andò G, Repetto A, Limbruno U, Cortese B, Sganzerla P, Lupi A, Galli M, Colangelo S, Ierna S, Ausiello A, Presbitero P, Sardella G, Varbella F, Esposito G, Santarelli A, Tresoldi S, Nazzaro M, Zingarelli A, de Cesare N, Rigattieri S, Tosi P, Palmieri C, Brugaletta S, Rao SV, Heg D, Rothenbühler M, Vranckx P, Jüni P, MATRIX Investigators Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015 385 2465 2476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6.
27. Anderson SG, Ratib K, Myint PK, Keavney B, Kwok CS, Zaman A, Ludman PF, de Belder MA, Nolan J, Mamas MA, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society; National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Impact of age on access site-related outcomes in 469,983 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015 86 965 972. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25896.
28. Jolly SS, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Cairns J, Chrolavicius S, Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2011 161 254 260.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.021.
29. Le May MR, Singh K, Wells GA, Efficacy of radial versus femoral access in the acute coronary syndrome: is it the operator or the operation that matters? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015 8 1405 1409. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.06.016.