An Existential Hermeneutic Philosophical Approach to Project Management

Project Management Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 48-62

  Rolfe, Bradley ^a,b   Segal, Steven ^b   Cicmil, Svetlana ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

disruption; existential; Heidegger; hermeneutic; redescription; Rorty

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016024466     PISSN: 87569728     EISSN: 19389507     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/875697281604700305     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ackroyd S., (1994). Re-creating common ground: Elements of post-paradigmatic organization studies. In Parker M., & Hassard J., (Eds.), Towards a new theory of organisations (pp. 269–297). London, England: Routledge
2. Arnold S. J., & Fischer E., (1994). Hermeneutics and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 55–69
3. Atkinson R., (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342
4. Ballard M., (2011). Public sector IT: Exploring the challenges involved in large-scale IT in the public sector. Retrieved from http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/
5. Berkun S., (2005). The art of project management. Sebastopal, CA: O'Reilly
6. Bloch M., Blumberg S., & Laartz J., (2012). Delivering large scale IT projects on time, on budget, and on value. McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/delivering-large-scale-it-projects-on-time-on-budget-and-on-value
7. Bolman L. G., & Deal T. E., (2013). Reframing organisations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
8. Bresnen M., (2006). Conflicting and conflated discourses? Project management, organisational change and learning. In Hodgson D., & Cicmil S., (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 68–89). Hampshire, United Kingdom: Palgrave MacMillan
9. Chalmers A., (1976). What is this thing called science? St. Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press
10. Chiu Y.C., (2011). A history of ancient project management: From Mesopotamia to the Roman Empire. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon
11. Christensen C. M., & Overdorf M., (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66–76
12. Cicmil S., & Braddon D., (2012). Fading Glory? Decision-making around the project: How and why “glory” projects fail. In Williams T., & Samset K., (Eds.), Project governance: Getting investments right (pp. 221–255). Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan
13. Cicmil S., & Hodgson D., (2006a). Are projects real? The PMBOK and the legitimation of project management knowledge. In Hodgson D., & Cicmil S., (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 29–50). Hampshire, United Kingdom: Palgrave MacMillan
14. Cicmil S., & Hodgson D., (2006b). New possibilities for project management theory: A critical engagement. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 111–122
15. DeCarlo D., (2004). Extreme project management: Using leadership, principles, and tools to deliver value in the face of volatility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
16. Dreyfus H. L., & Rabinow P., (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
17. Dru J.-M., (1996). Disruption: Overturning conventions and shaking up the marketplace. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons
18. Fincham R., (2002). Narratives of success and failure in systems development. British Journal of Management, 13(1), 1–14
19. Flores F., (2000). Heideggerian thinking and the transformation of business practice. In Wrathall M., & Malpas J., (Eds.), Heidegger, coping, and cognitive science: Essays in honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, (Vol. 2, pp. 271–291). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
20. Flyvbjerg B., (2012). Why mass media matter and how to work with them: Phronesis and mega-projects. In Flyvberg B., Landman T., & Schram S., (Eds.), Real social science: Applied phronesis (pp. 95–121). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
21. Frazier B., (2006). The ethics of rortian redescription. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 32(4), 461–492
22. Hartley S., (2009). Project management: Principles, processes and practice (2nd ed.). Frenchs Forest, New South Wales: Pearson Prentice Hall
23. Heidegger M., (1993). Martin Heidegger: Basic writings. San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins
24. Heidegger M., (1996). Being and time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press
25. Highsmith J. A., (2010). Agile project management: Creating innovative products. Boston, MA: Pearson Education
26. Hodgson D., & Cicmil S., (2007). The politics of standards in modern management: Making ‘the project’ a reality. Journal of Management Studies, 3(44), 431–450
27. Ijsseling S., (1982). Heidegger and the destruction of ontology. Man and World, 16, 3–16
28. Ivory C., Alderman N., McLoughlin I., & Vaughan R., (2006). Sense-making as a process within complex projects. In Hodgson D., & Cicmil S., (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 316–334). Hampshire, United Kingdom: Palgrave MacMillan
29. Kerzner H., (2001). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (7th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc
30. Koskela L., & Howell G., (2008). The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36(2), 22–34
31. Kozak-Holland M., (2011). The history of project management. Ontario, Canada: Multi-Media Publications
32. Kuhn T. S., (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
33. Lakoff G., & Johnson M., (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
34. Lenfle S., (2012). Towards a genealogy of project management: Sidewinder and the management of exploratory projects. Paper presented at the European Group for Organisational Studies (EGOS), Helsinki, Finland
35. Lewis J. P., (1999). The project manager's desk reference: A comprehensive guide to project planning, scheduling, evaluation and systems. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
36. Lindahl M., & Rehn A., (2007). Towards a theory of project failure. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(3), 246–254
37. Linehan C., & Kavanagh D., (2006). From project ontologies to communities of virtue. In Hodgson D., & Cicmil S., (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 51–67). Hampshire, United Kingdom: Palgrave MacMillan
38. MacIntyre A., (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press
39. MacIntyre A., (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press
40. Morris P., (2006). Making the management of projects critical. In Hodgson D., & Cicmil S., (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 335–347). Hampshire, United Kingdom: Palgrave MacMillan
41. Morris R.A., (2008). Project management that works: Real-world advice on problem solving, communicating and every thing else you need to know to get the job done. New York, NY: Amacom
42. Mullen J. D., (1995). Kierkegaard's philosophy: Self-deception and cowardice in the present age. Lanham, MD: University Press of America
43. Nietzsche F., (1969). On the geneology of morals. New York, NY: Random House
44. Perrin R., (2008). Real world project management: Beyond conventional wisdom, best practices, and project methodologies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
45. Plato. (2003). The republic (D. Lee, Trans.). London, England: Penguin Books
46. Reedy P., (2008). Mirror, mirror, on the wall: Reflecting on the ethics and effects of a collective critical management studies identity project. Management Learning, 391(1), 57–72
47. Rorty R., (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
48. Rorty R., (1982). Consequences of pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
49. Rorty R., (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
50. Rorty R., (1991). Essays on Heidegger and others—Philosphical papers, volume 2. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
51. Rorty R., (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London, England: Penguin Books
52. Schumpeter J., (1955). Imperialism and social classes: Two essays by Joseph Schumpeter. Cleveland, OH: Meridian Books
53. Segal S., (2015). Management practice and creative destruction: Existential skills for professional practice. Farnham, United Kingdom: Ashgate Gower
54. Smith C., (2006). A tale of an evolving project: Failed science or serial reinterpretation. In Hodgson D., & Cicmil S., (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 190–204). Hampshire, United Kingdom: Palgrave MacMillan
55. Spinosa C., Flores F., & Dreyfus H., (1997). Disclosing new worlds: Entrepreneurship, democratic action, and the cultivation of solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
56. The Standish Group. (2009). CHAOS summary report on IT industry projects. Retrieved from http://www.standishgroup.com/
57. Thomsett R., (2002). Radical project management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
58. Todres L., (2007). Embodied enquiry: Phenomenological touchstones for research, psychotherapy and spirituality. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan
59. Weaver P., (2007). A brief history of project management: Is our profession 50 or 5000 years old? APM Project, 19(11)
60. Whitty S. J., & Schulz M. F., (2007). The impact of Puritan ideology on aspects of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 10–20
61. Wysocki R., (2009). Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley
62. Zwikael O., & Smyrk J., (2011). Project management for the creation of organisational value. London, England: Springer-Verlag