Returning Results in Biobank Research: Global Trends and Solutions

Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 128-131

  De Clercq, Eva ^a   Kaye, Jane ^b   Wolf, Susan M ^c   Koenig, Barbara A ^d   Elger, Bernice S ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY CENTER OF LEGAL MEDICINE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biobank; dilemma; ethics; guidelines; return of results

Indexed keywords

BIOBANK; EASTERN EUROPE; ETHICS; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MIDDLE EAST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; ANIMAL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; HUMANS;

EID: 85015803533     PISSN: 19450265     EISSN: 19450257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0394     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. ACMG Board of Directors (2015) ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genet Med 17:68-69.
2. ACMG Board of Directors (2016). Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med [Epub ahead of print] DOI:10.1038/gim.2016.190.
3. Beier K, Schnorrer S (2011) Ethical and legal aspects of human tissue and biobank research in Europe: Report on the Tiss.EU project and its results. Scripted. J Law Technol Soc 8:99-105.
4. Bledsoe MJ, Clayton EW, McGuire AL, et al. (2013) Return of research results from genomic biobanks: Cost matters. Genet Med 15:157-159.
5. Elger BS (2010) Ethical Issues of Human Genetic Databases: A Challenge to Classical Health Research Ethics. Routledge, New York.
6. Elger BS, Biller-Andorno N, Capron AM (eds) (2008) Ethical Issues in Governing Biobanks: Global Perspectives. Rout-ledge, New York.
7. Garrett SB, Koenig BA, Brown A, et al. (2015) EngageUC: developing an efficient and ethical approach to biobanking research at the University of California. Clin Transl Sci 8:362-366.
8. Gottweis H, Kaye J (2012) Biobanks for Europe: A Challenge for Governance. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation; Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
9. Green RC, et al. (2013) ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 15:565-574.
10. Kinkorová J (2016) Biobanks in the era of personalized medicine: Objectives, challenges, and innovation. EPMA J 7:4.
11. Locock L, Boylan AR (2016) Biosamples as gifts? How par-ticipants in biobanking projects talk about donation. Health Expect 19:805-816.
12. Moore LJ, Casper MJ (2014) The Body: Social and Cultural Dissections. Routledge, London, New York.
13. Stranger M, Kaye J (2009) Principles and Practices in Biobank Governance. Routledge, New York.
14. Wolf SM, Crock BN, Van Ness B, et al. (2012) Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med 14: 361-384.
15. Wolf SM (2013) Return of results in genomic biobank research: Ethics matters. Genet Med 15:157-159.