Differences in Time to Interpretation for Evaluation of Bone Radiographs with Monitor and Film Viewing

Academic Radiology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 177-182

  Krupinski, Elizabeth A ^a   Lund, Pamela J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Images, analysis; Images, display; Images, processing; Workstation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER TERMINAL; EYE FIXATION; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INJURY; RADIOGRAPHY; TASK PERFORMANCE; X RAY FILM;

BONE AND BONES; COMPUTER TERMINALS; DATA DISPLAY; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0031084870     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80287-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Morin RL, Berquist TH, Rueger W. The Mayo Clinic Jacksonville electronic radiology practice. In: Kilcoyne RF, Lear JL, Rowberg AH, eds. Computer applications to assist radiology. Carlsbad, CA: Symposia Foundation, 1996;146-151.
2. Mosser HM, Partan G, Hruby W. Clinical routine operation of a filmless radiology department: three years experience. Proc SPIE 1995;2435: 321-327.
3. Fuchs A, Christianson F. The function of a digitized radiology department after one year in operation. In: Lemke HU, ed. Computer applications in radiology. New York, NY: Elsevier Science, 1996;1035.
4. Huang HK, Andriole K, Bazzill T, Lou SL, Wong AWK, Arenson RL. Design and implementation of a PACS system: the second time. J Digital Imaging 1996;9:47-59.
5. Kang KS, Park HW. Lossless medical image compression by multilevel decomposition. J Digital Imaging 1996;9:11-20.
6. Krupinski EA, Maloney K, Bessen SC, et al. Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1994;29:141-146.
7. Krupinski EA, Weinstein RS, Rozek LS. Experience-related differences in diagnosis from medical images displayed on monitors. Telemedicine J 1996;2:101-108.
8. Elam EA, Rehm K, et al. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. AJR 1992;158:509-514.
9. Beard DV, Hemminger BM, et al. How many screens does a CT workstation need? J Digital Imaging 1994;7:69-76.
10. Beard DV, Bream P, Pisano ED, et al. A pilot study of eye movement during mammography interpretation: eyetracker results and workstation design implications. J Digital Imaging (in press).
11. Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Toto LC, Krupinski EA. Recording and analyzing eye-position data using a microcomputer workstation. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1992;24:475-485.
12. Kanji GK. 100 statistical tests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1993;83.
13. Hu CH, Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA, Toto LC. Searching for bone fractures: a comparison with pulmonary nodule search. Acad Radiol 1994;1:25-32.
14. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA. Searching for lung nodules: visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions. Invest Radiol 1989;24:472-478.
15. Nodine CF, Kundel HL. Using eye movements to study visual search and improve tumor detection. RadioGraphics 1987;7:1241-1250.