Evaluating national capacity for direct participation in international accounting harmonization: France as a test case

Abacus

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 186-210

  Standish, Peter ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accounting; France; Harmonization; International

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015705377     PISSN: 00013072     EISSN: 14676281     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6281.00126     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Australian Accounting Standards Board, ED 102, International Convergence and Harmonization Policy, 2001.
2. Barthès de Ruyter, G., G. Gélard and D. Thouvenin, ‘Normalization comptable française—La nécessité d’un cadre conceptuel’, Les Cahiers de l’Audit, quatrième trimestre 2000.
3. Braithwaite, J., and P. Drahos, Global Business Regulation, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
4. Cailliau, J.-C., ‘Cadre conceptuel de la comptabilité’, Revue française de comptabilité, mai 1996.
5. Colasse, B., ‘Commentaire analytique et critique du projet de cadre conceptuel du CPDC’, Revue française de comptabilité, octobre 1996.
6. Colasse, B., and P. Standish, ‘State Versus Market: Contending Interests in the Struggle to Control French Accounting Standardization’, in S. Macleay and A. Raccoon (eds), Contemporary Issues in Accounting Regulation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
7. Colasse, B., and P. Standish, ‘The Development and Decline of Law in French Accounting Regulation’, in S. Macleay (ed.), Accounting Regulation in the European Union, Macmillan Palgrave, forthcoming.
8. Commission of the European Communities, MEMO/01/40, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Application of International Accounting Standards, 2000.
9. Compagnie Nationale des Commissaires aux Comptes and Ordre des Experts-Comptables, Developments in French Accounting and Auditing 2000, Expert Comptable Media, 2001.
10. Dugan, M., ‘Minimum Harmonization and the Internal Market’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2000.
11. Ebbers, G., and S. Macleay, ‘Accounting and —Territorial Claims on Accounting Regulation’, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1997.
12. Financial Accounting Standards Board, The IASC-U.S. Comparison Project: A Report on the Similarities and Differences between IASC Standards and U.S. GAAP, 2nd ed., FASB, 1999.
13. International Accounting Standards Committee, Report of the International Accounting Standards Committee's Strategy Working Party, Recommendations on Shaping IASC for the Future, 1999, www.iasc.org.uk.
14. International Accounting Standards Committee, Report of the International Accounting Standards Committee's Strategy Working Party, IASC Constitution, 2000, www.iasc.org.uk.
15. Licht, A., ‘Games Commissions Play: 2 × 2 Games of International Securities Regulation’, Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 61, No. 24, 1999.
16. Pong, C., and G. Whittington, ‘The Withdrawal of Current Cost Accounting in the United Kingdom: A Case Study of the Accounting Standards Committee’, Abacus, March 1996.
17. Standish, P., ‘Origins of the Plan Comptable General: A Study in Cultural Intrusion and Reaction’, Accounting and Business Research, Autumn 1990.
18. Standish, P., The French Plan Comptable, Ordre des Experts-Comptables, in conjunction with the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, 1997.
19. Tweedie, D., and G. Whittington, The Debate on Inflation Accounting, Cambridge University Press, 1984.