Microbial and nutritional regulation of high-solids anaerobic mono-digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes

Environmental Technology (United Kingdom)

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 405-413

  Mu, Hui ^a   Li, Yan ^a   Zhao, Yuxiao ^a   Zhang, Xiaodong ^a   Hua, Dongliang ^a   Xu, Haipeng ^a   Jin, Fuqiang ^a  

^a QILU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

anaerobic co digestion; anaerobic granular sludge; Fruit and vegetable wastes; high solids content; waste activated sludge

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FRUITS; GRANULAR MATERIALS; SLUDGE DIGESTION; VEGETABLES; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE; FRUIT AND VEGETABLE WASTE; HIGH-SOLIDS; WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGES;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

AMMONIA; BIOGAS; METHANE; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ABUNDANCE; ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AMMONIUM; BIOGAS; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DOMESTIC WASTE; ENZYME; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FRUIT; INHIBITION; METHANE; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; PH; PROTEIN;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE; ARCHAEON; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL ANAEROBIC SLUDGE; DIETARY INTAKE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FOOD WASTE; FRUIT; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; PH; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; SLUDGE; SLUDGE DIGESTION; VEGETABLE; WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BIOREACTOR; BIOREMEDIATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEWAGE; WASTE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOREACTORS; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; FRUIT; GARBAGE; SEWAGE; VEGETABLES; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

EID: 85015685180     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: 1479487X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1301571     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Liu X, Gao X, Wang W, et al. Pilot-scale anaerobic codigestion of municipal biomass waste: focusing on biogas production and GHG reduction. Renew Energy. 2012;44:463–468. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.092
2. Cheng H, Hu Y., Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable source of energy: current and future practices in China. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:3816–3824. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.040
3. Bouallagui H, Touhami Y, Cheikh BR, et al. Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: review. Process Biochem. 2005;40:989–995. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.03.007
4. Raynal J, Delgenès JP, Moletta R., Two-phase anaerobic digestion of solid wastes by a multiple liquefaction reactors process. Bioresour Technol. 1998;65:97–103. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00009-1
5. Jia JD, Ma LL, Jiang DP, et al. Development strategy for the science and technology innovation of biomass energy industry. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press; 2014.
6. Bouallagui H, Ben Cheikh R, Marouani L, et al. Mesophilic biogas production from fruit and vegetable waste in a tubular digester. Bioresour Technol. 2003;86:85–89. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00097-4
7. Liu GM, Dong YL, Xue JJ, et al. Characteristics of anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste and solid decrement. Environ Sci Technol (In Chinese). 2009;32:28–33.
8. Hartmann H, Ahring BK., Strategies for the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: an overview. Water Sci Technol. 2006;53:7–22. doi: 10.2166/wst.2006.231
9. Bouallagui H, Torrijos A, Godon JJ, et al. Two-phases anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: bioreactors performance. Biochem Eng J. 2004;21:193–197. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2004.05.001
10. Mata-Alvarez J, Mtz-Viturtia A, Llabres-Luengo P, et al. Kinetic and performance study of a batch two-phase anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes. Biomass Bioenerg. 1993;5:481–488. doi: 10.1016/0961-9534(93)90043-4
11. Heo NH, Park SC, Lee JS, et al. Single-stage anaerobic codigestion for mixture wastes of simulated Korean food waste and waste activated sludge. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2003;105:567–579. doi: 10.1385/ABAB:107:1-3:567
12. Van Lier JB., High-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment: diversifying from end-of-the-pipe treatment to resource-oriented conversion techniques. Water Sci Technol. 2008;57:1137–1148. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.040
13. Zhang D, Chen Y, Zhao Y, et al. New sludge pretreatment method to improve methane production in waste activated sludge digestion. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:4802–4808. doi: 10.1021/es1000209
14. Mata-Alvarez J, Cecchi F, Llabrés P, et al. Anaerobic digestion of the Barcelona central food market organic wastes: plant design and feasibility study. Bioresour Technol. 1992;42:33–42. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(92)90085-C
15. Mata-Alvarez J, Llabrés P, Cecchi F, et al. Anaerobic digestion of the Barcelona central food market organic wastes: experimental study. Bioresour Technol. 1992;39:39–48. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(92)90054-2
16. Borowski S, Kubacki P., Co-digestion of pig slaughterhouse waste with sewage sludge. Waste Manage. 2015;40:119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.021
17. Alvarez R, Liden G., Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste. Renew Energy. 2008;33:726–734. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.05.001
18. Haider MR, Zeshan, Yousaf S, et al. Effect of mixing ratio of food waste and rice husk co-digestion and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production. Bioresour Technol. 2015;190:451–457. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.105
19. Li D, Liu S, Mi L, et al. Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure. Bioresour Technol. 2015;189:319–326. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.033
20. Li D, Liu S, Mi L, et al. Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and pig manure. Bioresour Technol. 2015;187:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.040
21. Bouallagui H, Lahdheb H, Ben Romdan E, et al. Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition. J Environ Manage. 2009;90:1844–1849. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.002
22. Jiang Y, Heaven S, Banks CJ., Strategies for stable anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste. Renew Energy. 2012;44:206–214. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.012
23. Kafle GK, Kim SH., Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous operation. Appl Energy. 2013;103:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.018
24. Francesco DM, Martino B., Boosting methane generation by co-digestion of sludge with fruit and vegetable waste: internal environment of digester and methanogenic pathway. Waste Manage. 2015;43:130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.007
25. Gomez X, Cuestos MJ, Cara J, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of primary sludge and the fruit and vegetable fraction of the municipal solid wastes: conditions for mixing and evaluation of the organic loading rate. Renew Energy. 2006;31:2017–2024. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2005.09.029
26. Habiba L, Hassib B, Moktar H., Improvement of activated sludge stabilisation and filterability during anaerobic digestion by fruit and vegetable waste addition. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:1555–1560. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.019
27. Badshah M, Lam DM, Liu J, et al. Use of an automatic methane potential test system for evaluating the biomethane potential of sugarcane bagasse after different treatments. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:262–269. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.022
28. Kolbl S, Paloczi A, Panjan J, et al. Addressing case specific biogas plant tasks: industry oriented methane yields derived from 5L automatic methane potential test systems in batch or semi-continuous tests using realistic inocula, substrate particle sizes and organic loading. Bioresour Technol. 2014;153:180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.010
29. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.
30. Chung YC, Neethling JB., ATP as a measure of anaerobic sludge digester activity. Water Pollut Control Fed. 1988;60:107–112.
31. Yu Y, Hansen CL, Hwang S., Biokinetics in acidogenesis of highly suspended organic wastewater by adenosine 5′ triphosphate analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;78:147–156. doi: 10.1002/bit.10164
32. Mu H, Chen YG, Xiao ND., Effects of metal oxide nanoparticles (TiO2, Al2O3, SiO2 and ZnO) on waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:10305–10311. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.100
33. Mu H, Zheng X, Chen Y, et al. Response of anaerobic granular sludge to a shock load of zinc oxide nanoparticles during biological wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:5997–6003. doi: 10.1021/es300616a
34. Mu H, Chen Y., Long-term effect of ZnO nanoparticles on waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion. Water Research. 2011;45:5612–5620. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.022
35. Elbeshbishy E, Nakhla G, Hafez H., Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of food waste and primary sludge: influence of inoculum pre-incubation and inoculum source. Bioresour Technol. 2012;110:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.025
36. Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Nakamoto T, et al. Influence of substrate-to-inoculum ratio on the batch anaerobic digestion of bean curd refuse-okara under mesophilic conditions. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011;35:3251–3256. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.002
37. Jacob S, Banerjee R., Modeling and optimization of anaerobic codigestion of potato waste and aquatic weed by response surface methodology and artificial neural network coupled genetic algorithm. Bioresour Technol. 2016;214:386–395. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.068
38. Sekiguchi Y, Kamagata Y, Nakamura K, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotides reveals localization of methanogens and selected uncultured bacteria in mesophilic and thermophilic sludge granules. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:614–620.
39. MacLeod FA, Guiot SR, Costerton JW., Layered structure of bacterial aggregates produced in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed and filter reactor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:1598–1607.
40. Callaghan FJ, Wase DAJ, Thayanithy K, et al. Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass Bioenerg. 2002;22:71–77. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00057-5
41. Dinsdale RM, Premier GC, Hawkes FR, et al. Two-stage anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and fruit/vegetable waste using inclined tubular digesters. Bioresour Technol. 2000;72:159–168. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00105-4
42. Llaneza Coalla H, Blanco Fernandez JM, Moris Moran MA, et al. Biogas generation apple pulp. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:3843–3847. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.012
43. Razaghi A, Karthikeyan OP, Hao HT, et al. Hydrolysis treatments of fruit and vegetable waste for production of biofuel precursors. Bioresour Technol. 2016;217:100. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.041
44. Schnürer A, Zellner G, Svensson BH., Mesophilic syntrophic acetate oxidation during methane formation in biogas reactors. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1999;29:249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(99)00016-1
45. Raposo F, Borja R, Martin MA, et al. Influence of inoculum-substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: process stability and kinetic evaluation. Chem Eng J. 2009;149:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.001