Effect of mixing ratio of food waste and rice husk co-digestion and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 190, Issue , 2015, Pages 451-457

  Haider, Muhammad Rizwan ^a   Zeshan, ^a   Yousaf, Sohail ^a   Malik, Riffat Naseem ^a   Visvanathan, Chettiyappan ^b  

^a QUAID I AZAM UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

^b ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cellulosic biomass; Co digestion; Food waste; Rice husk; Substrate to inoculum ratio

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS; FEEDSTOCKS; MIXING; SUBSTRATES;

BATCH EXPERIMENTS; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CELLULOSIC BIOMASS; CODIGESTION; FOOD WASTE; MESOPHILIC CONDITION; ORGANIC LOADINGS; RICE HUSK;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

BIOGAS; ORGANIC NITROGEN; BIOFUEL; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; PLANT EXTRACT;

AMORPHOUS MEDIUM; BIOGAS; DIGESTIBILITY; GAS PRODUCTION; INOCULATION; MIXING RATIO; SUBSTRATE; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ALKALINITY; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADATION; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; ENERGY YIELD; FOOD WASTE; GAS MIXING; INOCULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RICE HUSK; SUBSTRATE INOCULUM RATIO; ANIMAL; BOVINE; FECES; FOOD CONTROL; FOOD INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; ORYZA; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; WASTE DISPOSAL;

ANIMALS; BIOFUELS; CATTLE; FECES; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; ORYZA; PLANT EXTRACTS; REFUSE DISPOSAL;

EID: 84930178452     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.105     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alvarez R., Lidén G. Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste. Renew. Energ. 2008, 33(4):726-734.
2. Alzate M.E., Muñoz R., Rogalla F., Fdz-Polanco F., Pérez-Elvira S.I. Biochemical methane potential of microalgae: influence of substrate to inoculum ratio, biomass concentration and pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 123:488-494.
3. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, APHA, Washington, DC. 21st ed.
4. Bouallagui H., Lahdheb H., Ben Romdan E., Rachdi B., Hamdi M. Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90(5):1844-1849.
5. Brake J.D. A Practical Guide for Composting Poultry Litter 1992, Miss. A.F.E.S. Bull.
6. Brown D., Li Y. Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 127:275-280.
7. Callaghan F.J., Wase D.A.J., Thayanithy K., Forster C.F. Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 22(1):71-77.
8. Chen X., Romano R.T., Zhang R. Anaerobic digestion of food wastes for biogas production. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2010, 3(4):61-72.
9. Dai X., Duan N., Dong B., Dai L. High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions: stability and performance. Waste Manage. 2013, 33(2):308-316.
10. Demirel B., Scherer P. Production of methane from sugar beet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32(3):203-209.
11. Drennan M.F., DiStefano T.D. High solids co-digestion of food and landscape waste and the potential for ammonia toxicity. Waste Manage. 2014, 34(7):1289-1298.
12. Elbeshbishy E., Nakhla G., Hafez H. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of food waste and primary sludge: influence of inoculum pre-incubation and inoculum source. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110:18-25.
13. El-Mashad H.M., Zhang R. Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(11):4021-4028.
14. Fernández B., Porrier P., Chamy R. Effect of inoculum-substrate ratio on the start-up of solid waste anaerobic digesters. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 44(4):103-108.
15. Forster-Carneiro T., Perez M., Romero L.I. Influence of total solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:6994-7002.
16. Garcia-Peña E., Parameswaran P., Kang D., Canul-Chan M., Krajmalnik-Brown R. Anaerobic digestion and co-digestion processes of vegetable and fruit residues: process and microbial ecology. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(20):9447-9455.
17. Heo N.H., Park S.C., Kang H. Effects of mixture ratio and hydraulic retention time on single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2004, 39(7):1739-1756.
18. Joeng H., Kim K. KOICA-World Bank joint study on solid waste management in Punjab, Pakistan 2007, Waste Manage, Pakistan.
19. Kafle G.K., Kim S.H. Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous operation. Appl. Energy 2013, 103:61-72.
20. Li R., Chen S., Li X. Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with dairy manure in a two-phase digestion system. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160(2):643-654.
21. Li Y., Park S.Y., Zhu J. Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2011, 15(1):821-826.
22. Li Y., Zhang R., Liu X., Chen C., Xiao X., Feng L., He Y., Liu G. Evaluating methane production from anaerobic mono-and co-digestion of kitchen waste, corn stover, and chicken manure. Energy Fuels 2013, 27(4):2085-2091.
23. Li H., Guo X., Cao F., Wang Y. Process evolution of dry anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with kitchen waste. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 2014, 28(1):161-166.
24. Lin J., Zuo J., Gan L., Li P., Liu F., Wang K., Chen L., Gan H. Effects of mixture ratio on anaerobic co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste and food waste of China. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23(8):1403-1408.
25. Liu G., Zhang R., El-Mashad H.M., Dong R. Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5103-5108.
26. Liu X., Wang W., Shi Y., Zheng L., Gao X., Qiao W., Zhou Y. Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste and waste activated sludge in China: effect of organic loading rate. Waste Manage. 2012, 32(11):2056-2060.
27. Mahar, A., Malik, R.N., Qadir, A., Ahmed, T., Khan, Z., Khan, M.A., 2007. Review and analysis of current solid waste management situation in urban areas of Pakistan. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Manage, Chennai, pp. 34-41.
28. Mata-Alvarez J., Dosta J., Romero-Güiza M., Fonoll X., Peces M., Astals S. A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014, 36:412-427.
29. Mateescu C., Constantinescu I. Comparative analysis of inoculum biomass for biogas potential in the anaerobic digestion. U.P.B. Sci. Bull. 2011, 73(3):99-104.
30. Mirani A.A., Ahmad M., Kalwar S.A., Ahmad T. A rice husk gasifier for paddy drying. Sci. Technol. Dev. 2013, 32:120-125.
31. Nagao N., Tajima N., Kawai M., Niwa C., Kurosawa N., Matsuyama T., Yusoff Md.F., Toda T. Maximum organic loading rate for the single-stage wet anaerobic digestion of food waste. Water Res. 2012, 118:210-218.
32. Peters J.B., Combs S., Hoskins B., Jarman J., Kovar J., Watson M., Wolf A., Wolf N. Recommended Methods of Manure Analysis 2003, Cooperative Extension Pub.
33. Wang X., Yang G., Feng Y., Ren G., Han X. Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 120:78-83.
34. Zhou Y., Zhang Z., Nakamoto T., Li Y., Yang Y., Utsumi M., Sugiura N. Influence of substrate-to-inoculum ratio on the batch anaerobic digestion of bean curd refuse-okara under mesophilic conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35(7):3251-3256.