The political economy of legislative change: Neoliberalising planning legislation

Neoliberal Urban Policy and the Transformation of the City: Reshaping Dublin

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 53-65

  Murphy, Enda ^a   Fox Rogers, Linda ^a   Grist, Berna ^a  

^a UCD   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015575540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9781137377050     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Albrechts, L. (2002) The planning community reflects on enhancing public involvement: Views from academics and reflective practitioners, Planning Theory and Practice, 3, 331-47.
2. Allmendinger, P. (1996) Thatcherism and Simplified Planning Zones: An Implementation Perspective. Oxford Planning Monographs, 2. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
3. An Taisce (2012) State of the Nation: A Review of Ireland's Planning System 2000 - 2011. Dublin: An Taisce.
4. Brenner, N., Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2010) After neoliberalization? Globalizations, 7, 327-45.
5. Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002) Cities and the geographies of 'actually existing neoliberalism', Antipode, 34, 348-79.
6. Connolly, J. (2000) The Planning and Development Bill 1999 and access to the Courts, Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 7, 62-64.
7. Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (DoEHLG). (2007) Development Management Guidelines for Planning Authorities. Dublin: Stationery Office.
8. Dodd, S. (2004) Substantial interest, locus standi and judicial review: Recent developments, Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 11, 9-16.
9. Ellis, G. (2001) A review of third party planning appeals, Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 8, 63-69.
10. Flynn, T. (2000) Strategic Development Zones and the Planning Act 2000, Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 7, 101-04.
11. Fox-Rogers, L. and Murphy, E. (2013) Informal strategies of power in the local planning system, Planning Theory, DOI: 10.1177/1473095213492512.
12. Fox-Rogers, L., Murphy, E. and Grist, B. (2011) Legislative change in Ireland: A Marxist political economy critique of planning law, Town Planning Review, 82, 639-68.
13. Government of Ireland. (2012) The Tribunal of Enquiry into Certain Planning Matters and Payments. Dublin: Dublin Stationery Office.
14. Grist, B. (1983) Twenty Years of Planning: A Review of the System since 1963. Dublin: An Foras Forbartha.
15. Grist, B. (2001) Curtailment of Third Party Planning Appeals in the Republic of Ireland, Scottish Planning and Environmental Law, 86, 80-82.
16. Grist, B. (2008) The Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act - one year on, Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 15, 3-11.
17. Grist, B. (2012) An Introduction to Irish Planning Law. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
18. Grist, B. and Macken, J. (2010) The Irish Planning Law Factbook. Dublin: Thomson Round Hall.
19. Harvey, D. (1973) Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnold.
20. Harvey, D. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism, Geografiska Annaler, 71B, 3-17.
21. Macken, J. (1999) The Planning and Development Bill, 1999, Bar Review, 5, 148-57.
22. McGuirk, P. (1995) Power and influence in urban planning: Community and property interests participation in Dublin's planning system, Irish Geography, 28, 64-75.
23. McGuirk, P. M. (1994) Economic restructuring and the realignment of the urban planning system: The case of Dublin, Urban Studies, 31, 289-307.
24. Murphy, E. and Scott, M. (2013) Mortgage-related issues in a crisis economy: Evidence from rural households in Ireland, Geoforum, 46, 34-44.
25. Peck, J. (2010) Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (1994) Jungle law breaks out: Neoliberalism and global-local disorder, Area, 26, 317-26.
27. Sager, T. (2011) Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990-2010, Progress in Planning, 76, 147-99.
28. Simmie, J. and French, S. (1989) Corporatism, participation and planning: The case of London, Progress in Planning, 31, 1-57.