Informal strategies of power in the local planning system

Planning Theory

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 244-268

  Fox Rogers, Linda ^a   Murphy, Enda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

collaborative planning; informal planning; Neoliberalisation; planning and the state; political economy; power; urban planning

Indexed keywords

LOCAL PLANNING; METHODOLOGY; PLANNING SYSTEM; POLITICAL ECONOMY; RESEARCH; URBAN PLANNING;

COUNTY DUBLIN; DUBLIN [COUNTY DUBLIN]; IRELAND; LEINSTER;

EID: 84902996189     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095213492512     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Abu-Orf H.Collaborative planning in practice: The Nicosia masterplan.Planning, Practice and Research. 2005;20 (1): 41-58.
2. Allen JLost Geographies of Power. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003:.
3. Allmendinger P.Thatcherism and simplified planning zones: An implementation perspective.Planning, Practice and Research. 1997;12 (2): 147-160.
4. Allmendinger PHampshire: Palgrave; 2002:.
5. State of the Nation: A Review of Ireland's Planning System 2000 - 2011. Dublin: An Taisce; 2012:.
6. Arnstein NS.A ladder of citizen participation.Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1969;30:216-224.
7. Bassett K.Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: New forms of urban governance in an English city?.Urban Studies. 1996;33 (3): 539-555.
8. Blowers AThe Limits of Power: The Politics of Local Planning Policy. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd; 1980:.
9. Brenner N,Theodore N.Cities and the geographies of 'Actually Existing Neoliberalism'.Antipode. 2002;33 (3): 349-379.
10. Brenner N,Theodore N.Neoliberalism and the urban condition.City. 2005;9 (1): 101-107.
11. Brenner N,Peck J,Theodore N.After neoliberalization?.Globalizations. 2010;7 (3): 327-345.
12. Brindley T,Rydin Y,Stoker GRemaking Planning: The Politics of Urban Change in the Thatcher Years. London: Unwin Hyman; 1989:.
13. Bryman ASocial Research Methods. 2004) Social Research Methods. 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004:.
14. Cooke PTheories of Planning and Spatial Development. London: Hutchinson & Co. Ltd; 1983:.
15. Urbanization and Urban Planning in a Capitalist Society. Dear MScott AJ, ed. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd; 1981:.
16. Department of the Environment Community and Local Government (DoECLG) (various) Annual Planning Statistics (2000-2011) Available at: http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/StatisticsandRegularPublications/PlanningStatistics/(accessed 20 October 2012).
17. Dunn ECPolitics and Practice in Economic Geography. Tickell, ed. London: SAGE; 2007:82-93.
18. Dyrberg TBThe Circular Structure of Power: Politics, Identity, Community. London: Verso; 1997:.
19. Fainstein S.New directions in planning theory.Urban Affairs Review. 2000;35:451-478.
20. Flyvbjerg BRationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. London: The University of Chicago Press Ltd; 1998:.
21. Forester JPlanning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1989:.
22. Forester J.On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations.Planning Theory. 2013;12 (1): 5-22.
23. Fox-Rogers L,Murphy E,Grist B.Legislative change in Ireland: A Marxist political economy critique of planning law.Town Planning Review. 2011;82 (6): 639-668.
24. The Tribunal of Enquiry into Certain Planning Matters and Payments. Dublin: Dublin Stationary Office; 2012:.
25. Grange K.Shaping acting space: In search of a new political awareness among local authority planners.Planning Theory. 2012;:.
26. Gunder M.Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space.Planning Theory. 2010;9 (4): 298-314.
27. Gunder M,Mouat C.Symbolic violence and victimisation in planning processes: A reconnoitre of the New Zealand Resource Management Act.Planning Theory. 2002;1 (2): 124-145.
28. Harris NPlanning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory. Allmendinger PTewdwr-Jones M, ed. London: Routledge; 2002:21-43.
29. Harvey DThe Urbanization of Capital. London: Basil Blackwell Ltd; 1985:.
30. Healey P.Consensus-building across difficult divisions: new approaches to collaborative strategy making.Planning Practice and Research. 1996;11 (2): 207-216.
31. Healey PCollaborative planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Hampshire: Macmillian Press Ltd; 1997:.
32. Healey P.Collaborative planning in perspective.Planning Theory. 2003;2:101-123.
33. Healey P.The pragmatic tradition in planning thought.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2009;28:277-292.
34. Hearn JTheorizing Power. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012:.
35. Hibbard M,Lurie S.Saving land but losing ground: Challenges to community planning in the era of participation.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2000;20:187-195.
36. Hillier J.Going round the back? Complex networks and informal action in local planning processes.Environment and Planning A. 2000;32:33-54.
37. Hillier J.Agon'izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be 'Real.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (1): 37-59.
38. Hillier J.Plan(e) speaking: A multiplanar theory of spatial planning.Planning Theory. 2008;7 (1): 24-50.
39. Innes JE.Planning through consensus building.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1996;62 (4): 460-473.
40. Innes JE.Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics.Planning Theory. 2004;3:5-20.
41. Kirk GUrban Planning in a Capitalist City. London: Croom Helm Ltd; 1980:.
42. Kitchin R,O'Callaghan C,Boyle M, et al.Placing neoliberalism: The rise and fall of Ireland's Celtic Tiger.Environment and Planning A. 2012;44 (6): 1302-1326.
43. Knox P,Cullen J.Town planning and the internal survival mechanisms of urbanised capitalism.Area. 1981;13 (3): 183-188.
44. Leino H,Laine M.Do matters of concern matter? Bringing issues back to participation.Planning Theory. 2011;11 (1): 89-103.
45. Lukes SPower: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1974:.
46. McGuirk P.Power and influence in urban planning: Community and property interests' participation in Dublin's planning system.Irish Geography. 1995;28:64-75.
47. McGuirk P.Power and policy networks in urban governance: Local government and property-led regeneration in Dublin.Urban Studies. 2000;37 (4): 651-672.
48. McGuirk P.Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power and knowledge.Environment and Planning A. 2001;33:195-217.
49. MacLaran A,McGuirk PMaking Space: Property Development and Urban Planning. MacLaran A, ed. London: Arnold; 2003:63-94.
50. Mason M.Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews.Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2010;11 (3):.
51. Murphy E,Redmond D.The role of 'hard' and 'soft' factors for accommodating creative knowledge: Insights from Dublin's 'creative class'.Irish Geography. 2009;42 (1): 69-84.
52. Neuman M.Communicate this! Does consensus lead to advocacy and pluralism?.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2000;19:343-349.
53. Paul WThe State: Its Origin and Function. Glasgow: Socialist Labour Press; 1917:.
54. Peck J,Tickell A.Neoliberalising Space.Antipode. 2002;34 (3): 380-404.
55. Phelps N,Tewdwr-Jones MA.Scratching the surface of collaborative and associative governance: Identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building.Environment and Planning A. 2000;32:111-130.
56. Pløger J.Public participation and the art of governance.Environment and Planning B. 2001;28:219-241.
57. Pløger J.Strife: Urban planning and agonism.Planning Theory. 2004;3 (1): 71-92.
58. Purcell M.Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements?.Planning Theory. 2009;8:140-165.
59. Rydin Y.The enabling local state and urban development: Resources, rhetoric and planning in East London.Urban Studies. 1998;35 (2): 175-191.
60. Sager T.Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990-2010.Progress in Planning. 2011;76:147-199.
61. Sandercock LTowards Cosmopolis. Chichester: John Wiley; 1998:.
62. Scott AJ,Roweis ST.Urban planning in theory and practice: A reappraisal.Environment and Planning A. 1977;9 (10): 1097-1119.
63. Squires GDReadings in Urban Theory. Fainstein SCampbell S, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1996:266-290.
64. Tewdwr-Jones M,Thomas I.Collaborative action in local plan-making: Planners' perceptions of 'planning through debate'.Environment and Planning B. 1998;25:127-144.
65. Tewdwr-Jones MD,Allmendinger P.Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning.Environment and Planning A. 1998;30:1975-1989.
66. Watson S,Gibson KPostmodern Cities and Spaces. Watson SGibson K, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995:254-264.
67. Watson V.Planning under political transition-lessons from Cape Town's metropolitan planning forum.International Planning Studies. 1998;3 (3): 335-351.