A guide to just and fair remediation of counseling students with professional performance deficiencies

Counselor Education and Supervision

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 2-13

  McAdams, Charles R ^a   Foster, Victoria A ^a  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015516110     PISSN: 00110035     EISSN: 15566978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2007.tb00034.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA code of ethics. Retrieved June 12, 2005, from http: www.cacd.orgACA2005EthicalCode10405.pdf.
2. Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, § 2, 104 Stat. 328 (1991).
3. Association for Counselor Education and Supervision. (1993). Ethical guidelines for counseling supervisors. Retrieved June 15, 2005, from http: www.acesonline.netethicalguidelines.asp.
4. Baldo, T. D., Softas-Nall, B. C., and Shaw, S. F., (1997). Student review and retention in counselor education: An alternative to Frame and Stevens-Smith. Counselor Education and Supervision, 36, 245-253.
5. Bemak, F., Epp, L. R., and Keys, S. G., (1999). Impaired graduate students: A process model of graduate program monitoring and intervention. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 21, 19-30.
6. Board of Curators, University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78, 88-92 (1978).
7. Cassaza, M. E., and Silverman, S. L., (1996). Learning assistance and developmental education: A guide for practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Connelly v. University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, 244 F. Supp. 156 (D. Vt. 1965).
9. Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2001). 2001 standards. Retrieved, June 22, 2005, from http: www.cacrep.org2001Standards.html.
10. Dripps, D. A., (2003). About guilt and innocence: The origins, development, and future of constitutional criminal procedure. Westport, CT: Praeger.
11. Due process of law. (1998). West’s encyclopedia of American law. St. Paul, MN: West Group. Retreived October 30, 2006, from http: www.answers.comtopicdue-processcatbiz-fin.
12. Dutile, N. P., (2002). Students and due process in higher education: Of interests and procedures. Florida Coastal Law Journal, 2, 243-290.
13. Elman, N., Forrest, L., Vacha-Haase, T., and Gizara, S., (1999). A systems perspective on trainee impairment: Continuing the dialogue. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 712-721.
14. Falcone v. Univ. of Minn., 388 F.3d 656 (8th Cir. 2004).
15. Frame, M. W., and Stevens-Smith, P., (1995). Out of harm’s way: Enhancing monitoring and dismissal procedures in counselor education programs. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35, 118-129.
16. Ignash, J. M., (1997). Who should provide postsecondary remedial/developmental education? New Directions for Community Colleges, 100, 5-20.
17. Kerl, S. B., Garcia, J. L., McCullough, S. C., and Maxwell, M. E., (2002). Systematic evaluation of professional performance: Legally supported procedure and process. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 321-334.
18. Kommers, P. D., and Finn, J. E., (1998). American constitutional law: Essays, cases, and comparative notes. New York: West/Wadsworth.
19. ‘Lectric Law Library. (n.d.). Common law. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from http: www.lectlaw.comdefc070.htm.
20. Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976).
21. McAdams, C. R., Foster, V. A., and Ward, T. J., (2007). Remediation and dismissal policies in counselor education: Lessons learned from a challenge in federal court. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46, 212-229.
22. Nickerson v. University of Alaska, Anchorage, 975 P.2d 46, 134 Ed. Law (1999).
23. Ohio v. Wood, 112 Ohio App. 3d 621, 679 N.E. 2d 735 (Crt. App. Ohio, 1996).
24. Pitts, D., (2001). The Scottsboro boys and fundamental rights. Issues of Democracy, 6(1). Retrieved September 3, 2006, from http: www.usinfo.state.govjournalsitdhr0701ijdepitts.htm.
25. Plaintiff v. Rector and Board of Visitors of The College of William and Mary, No. 03-2119 (4th Cir. February 8, 2005).
26. Rawls, J., (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
27. Regents of Univ. of Mich. v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214 (1985).
28. Reilley, E. L., (1999). County of Sacramento v. Lewis: A conscience-shocking decision regarding officer liability in high-speed police pursuits. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 32, 1357-1397.
29. Richardson, J. W., (2005). Who shall be educated? The case of restricting remediation at the City University of New York. Education and Urban Society, 37, 174-192.
30. Ross, D., (1970). Remedial or developmental? Confusion over terms. The Two-Year College Mathematics Journal, 1, 27-31.
31. Stevens, E., (2000). Due process and higher education: A systemic approach to fair decision making. San Francisco: Wiley.
32. Thomas, S. B., (2000). College students and disability law. Journal of Special Education, 33, 248-257.
33. Thomas v. Gee, 850 F. Supp. 665, 676 (S. D. Ohio 1994).
34. Wood, N. L., and Wood, R. A., (1996). Due process in student discipline: A primer. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 26, 11-18.
35. Woodis v. Westark Community College, 160 F.3d 435 (8th Circ. 1998).