The CEECHE: A practical approach for reducing exposures and disease outcomes in Central and Eastern Europe

Reviews on Environmental Health

Volumn 32, Issue 1-2, 2017, Pages 3-8

  Suk, William A ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

environmental health; global health; hazardous waste; networks; policy; remediation

Indexed keywords

DANGEROUS GOODS;

DANGEROUS GOODS; EASTERN EUROPE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; EUROPE; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY; UNITED STATES;

ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; EUROPE; EUROPE, EASTERN; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES (U.S.); RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85015190777     PISSN: 00487554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2016-0036     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Carpenter DO, Suk WA, Blaha K, Cikrt M. Hazardous wastes in Eastern and Central Europe [meeting report]. Environ Health Persp 1996;104(3):244-8.
2. Mogos A, Bird M. Soviet uranium legacy blights eastern EU. EUobserver [Internet] 2016 July 27, 2016.
3. Williams I. Why are some European cities so much better than others at dealing with their garbage? CityMetric [Internet]. 2016 July 27, 2016; (http://www.citymetric.com/horizons/why-are-some-european-cities-so-much-better-others-dealing-their-garbage-1955).
4. Craft ES, Donnelly KC, Neamtiu I, McCarty KM, Bruce E, et al. Pri-oritizing environmental issues around the world: opinions from an international Central and Eastern European environmental health conference. Environ Health Perspec 2006;114(12):1813-7.
5. Suk W, Ruchirawat M, Stein RT, Diaz-Barriga F, Carpenter DO, et al. Health consequences of environmental exposures in early life: coping with a changing world in the Post-MDG Era. Ann Global Health 2016;82(1):20-7.
6. Federico M, Balde K, Habib H. Quantifying waste of electric and electronic equipment in Romania. http://www.ecotic.ro/wp-con-tent/uploads/2015/11/WEEE-Generated-study-2015.pdf: ECOTIC and The United Nations University, 2015.
7. Heacock M, Kelly CB, Asante KA, Birnbaum LS, Bergman AL, et al. E-waste and harm to vulnerable populations: a growing global problem. Environ Health Perspect 2016;124(5):550-5.
8. Heacock M, Kelly CB, Suk WA. E-waste: the growing global problem and next steps. Rev Environ Health 2016;31(1):131-5.
9. Trasande L, Massey RI, DiGangi J, Geiser K, Olanipekun AI, et al. How developing nations can protect children from hazardous chemical exposures while sustaining economic growth. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2011;30(12):2400-9.
10. Suk WA, Ahanchian H, Asante KA, Carpenter DO, Diaz-Barriga F, et al. Environmental pollution: an under-recognized threat to children's health, especially in low-and middle-income countries. Environ Health Perspect 2016;124(3):A41-5.
11. Prüss-Üstuün A, Corvalán C. Preventing disease through healthy environments. Towards an estimate of the environmental burden of disease. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2006 Contract No.: ISBN 92 4 159382 2.
12. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. [Internet]. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2013 [cited 07/31/2016].
13. Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14(8):1847-50.
14. Wild CP, Scalbert A, Herceg Z. Measuring the exposome: a pow-erful basis for evaluating environmental exposures and cancer risk. Environ Mol Mutagen 2013;54(7):480-99.
15. Suk WA, Davis EA. Strategies for addressing global environmental health concerns. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008;1140:40-4.
16. Suk WA. A quarter century of the Pacific Basin Consortium: looking back to move forward. Rev Environ Health 2016;31(1):3-9.