Agreement of ocular symptom reporting between patient-reported outcomes and medical records

JAMA Ophthalmology

Volumn 135, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 225-231

  Valikodath, Nita G ^a   Newman Casey, Paula Anne ^a,b   Lee, Paul P ^a,b   Musch, David C ^a,b,c   Niziol, Leslie M ^a   Woodward, Maria A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLURRED VISION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EYE BURNING; EYE DISCOMFORT; EYE DISEASE; EYE PAIN; EYE REDNESS; FEMALE; GLARE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OCULAR PRURITUS; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EYE DISEASES; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SELF DISCLOSURE; VERY ELDERLY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EYE DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; ROC CURVE; SELF DISCLOSURE; SELF REPORT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85015173058     PISSN: 21686165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5551     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Raymond L, Pare G, Ortiz de Guinea A, et al. Improving performance in medical practices through the extended use of electronic medical record systems: a survey of Canadian family physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15:27.
2. Jamoom E, Yang N, Hing E. Percentage of office-based physicians using any electronic health records or electronic medical records, physicians that have a basic system, and physicians that have a certified system, by state: United States, 2014 (table). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nehrs/2015-web-tables.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed November 8, 2016.
3. Hsiao CJ, Hing E. Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db143.htm. Published January 2014. Accessed November 8, 2016.
4. Institute of Medicine. Key capabilities of an electronic health record system. http://www .nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2003/Key-Capabilities-of-an-Electronic-Health-Record-System.aspx. Released July 31, 2003. Accessed November 8, 2016.
5. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care: a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(1):50-60.
6. ChiangMF, Boland MV, Margolis JW, Lum F, Abramoff MD, Hildebrand PL; American Academy of Ophthalmology Medical Information Technology Committee. Adoption and perceptions of electronic health record systems by ophthalmologists: an American Academy of Ophthalmology survey. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1591-1597.
7. Street RL Jr, Liu L, Farber NJ, et al. Provider interaction with the electronic health record: the effects on patient-centered communication in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96 (3):315-319.
8. St Sauver JL, Hagen PT, Cha SS, et al. Agreement between patient reports of cardiovascular disease and patient medical records. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005; 80(2):203-210.
9. Fromme EK, Eilers KM, Mori M, Hsieh YC, Beer TM. How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? a comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(17):3485-3490.
10. Beckles GL, Williamson DF, Brown AF, et al. Agreement between self-reports and medical records was only fair in a cross-sectional study of performance of annual eye examinations among adults with diabetes in managed care. Med Care. 2007;45(9):876-883.
11. CorserW, Sikorskii A, Olomu A, Stommel M, Proden C, Holmes-Rovner M. Concordance between comorbidity data from patient self-report interviews and medical record documentation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:85.
12. Echaiz JF, Cass C, Henderson JP, Babcock HM, Marschall J. Low correlation between self-report and medical record documentation of urinary tract infection symptoms. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43 (9):983-986.
13. Yadav S, Kazanji N, Narayan KC, et al. Comparison of accuracy of physical examination findings in initial progress notes between paper charts and a newly implemented electronic health record [published online June 29, 2016]. J AmMed Inform Assoc. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw067
14. Shachak A, Hadas-DayagiM, Ziv A, Reis S. Primary care physicians' use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(3):341-348.
15. Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA, Larson S, Reis S. Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(1):134-141.
16. Friedberg M, Crosson FJ, Tutty M. Physicians' concerns about electronic health records: implications and steps towards solutions. http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2014/03/11/physicians-concerns-about-electronic-health-records-implications-and-steps-towards-solutions/. Published March 11, 2014. Accessed November 8, 2016.
17. Mamykina L, Vawdrey DK, Stetson PD, Zheng K, Hripcsak G. Clinical documentation: composition or synthesis? J AmMed Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6): 1025-1031.
18. Bowman S. Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2013;10:1c.
19. Weiskopf NG,Weng C. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. J AmMed Inform Assoc. 2013;20(1):144-151.
20. RaghupathiW, Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014;2:3.
21. Ross MK,WeiW, Ohno-Machado L. "Big data" and the electronic health record. Yearb Med Inform. 2014;9:97-104.
22. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, Gutierrez P, Berry S, Hays RD; NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(11):1496-1504.
23. Paz SH, Slotkin J, McKean-Cowdin R, et al. Development of a vision-targeted health-related quality of life item measure. Qual Life Res. 2013;22 (9):2477-2487.
24. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(5):615-621.
25. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6(2):65-70.
26. Fries JF. Alternatives in medical record formats. Med Care. 1974;12(10):871-881.
27. Barbara AM, Loeb M, Dolovich L, Brazil K, Russell M. Agreement between self-report and medical records on signs and symptoms of respiratory illness. Prim Care Respir J. 2012;21(2): 145-152.
28. Pakhomov SV, Jacobsen SJ, Chute CG, Roger VL. Agreement between patient-reported symptoms and their documentation in the medical record. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(8):530-539.
29. Stengel D, Bauwens K,Walter M, Kopfer T, Ekkernkamp A. Comparison of handheld computer-assisted and conventional paper chart documentation of medical records: a randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A (3):553-560.
30. Chan P, Thyparampil PJ, ChiangMF. Accuracy and speed of electronic health record versus paper-based ophthalmic documentation strategies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(1):165-172.e2. doi:10 .1016/j.ajo.2013.02.010
31. Sommer A. The utility of "big data" and social media for anticipating, preventing, and treating disease. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(9):1030-1031.
32. Parke DW, LumF, Rich WL. The IRIS Registry: purpose and perspectives [published online June 15, 2016]. Ophthalmologe. doi:10.1007/s00347-016-0265-1
33. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5)(suppl 1):S3-S11.
34. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA's Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/newsevents/ucm481662.htm. Published 2016. Accessed December 19, 2016.