Adoption and Perceptions of Electronic Health Record Systems by Ophthalmologists: An American Academy of Ophthalmology Survey

Ophthalmology

Volumn 115, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Chiang, Michael F ^a   Boland, Michael V ^b   Margolis, James W ^c   Lum, Flora ^d   Abramoff, Michael D ^e,f   Hildebrand, P Lloyd ^g  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MEDICAL GROUP MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^d Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^f VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTRONICS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; WESTERN HEMISPHERE;

EID: 50449086292     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Shortliffe E.H. The evolution of electronic medical records. Acad Med 74 (1999) 414-419
2. Weed L.L. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med 278 (1968) 593-600
3. Kassirer J.P. The next transformation in the delivery of health care. N Engl J Med 332 (1995) 52-54
4. Committee on Improving the Patient Record. Summary. In: Dick R.S., Steen E.B., and Detmer D.E. (Eds). The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Revised ed (1997), National Academy Press, Washington, D.C 45-46. http://www.books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5306%26page=R1 http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5306&page=R1. Accessed March 11, 2008
5. Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco. Chronic Care in America: a 21St Century Challenge (1996), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ. http://www.rwjf.org/files/publications/other/ChronicCareinAmerica.pdf p.13. Available at: www.rwjf.org/files/publications/other/ChronicCareinAmerica.pdf. Accessed February 16, 2008
6. Greenes R.A., and Shortliffe E.H. Medical informatics: an emerging academic discipline and institutional priority. JAMA 263 (1990) 1114-1120
7. Arndt K.A. Information excess in medicine: overview, relevance to dermatology, and strategies for coping. Arch Dermatol 128 (1992) 1249-1256
8. Humphreys B.L., and McCutcheon D.E. Growth patterns in the National Library of Medicine's serials collection and in Index Medicus journals, 1966-1985. Bull Med Libr Assoc 82 (1994) 18-24
9. In: Kohn L.T., Corrigan J.M., and Donaldson M.S. (Eds). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9728%26page=R1 1. Available at: http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9728&page=R1. Accessed March 11, 2008
10. Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System [letter report]. Washington, DC (2003), National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10781 Available at: http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id = 10781 Accessed March 11, 2008
11. Bates D.W., and Gawande A.A. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 348 (2003) 2526-2534
12. Kawamoto K., Houlihan C.A., Balas E.A., and Lobach D.F. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 330 (2005) 765. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/330/7494/765 Available at: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/330/7494/765. Accessed March 11, 2008
13. Moody M. HIPAA strengthens business case for electronic report distribution systems. J Healthc Inf Manag 16 (2002) 47-51
14. Kilbridge P. The cost of HIPAA compliance. N Engl J Med 348 (2003) 1423-1424
15. Sax U., and Schmidt S. Integration of genomic data in Electronic Health Records-opportunities and dilemmas. Methods Inf Med 44 (2005) 546-550
16. State of the Union Address [press release]. Washington, DC: United States Capitol; January 20, 2004. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/01/20040120-7.html Accessed September 16, 2007
17. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). Goals of strategic framework. http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/goals.html Accessed October 1, 2007
18. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Digital imaging standards. http://www.aao.org/education/statements/alerts/digital.cfm Accessed July 7, 2007
19. Gans D., Kralewski J., Hammons T., and Dowd B. Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff (Millwood) 24 (2005) 1323-1333
20. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10027 Available at: http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10027 Accessed March 11, 2008
21. Kaushal R., Shojania K.G., and Bates D.W. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 163 (2003) 1409-1416
22. Wang S.J., Middleton B., Prosser L.A., et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med 114 (2003) 397-403
23. Grieger D.L., Cohen S.H., and Krusch D.A. A pilot study to document the return on investment for implementing an ambulatory electronic health record at an academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 205 (2007) 89-96
24. Miller R.H., Hillman J.M., and Given R.S. Physician use of IT: results from the Deloitte Research Survey. J Healthc Inf Manag 18 (2004) 72-80
25. The Commonwealth Fund. 2006 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Doctors. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr_doc/topline_results_2006_IHPsurvey2. pdf?section = 4056 Accessed October 24, 2007
26. Miller R.H., and Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood) 23 (2004) 116-126
27. Makoul G., Curry R.H., and Tang P.C. The use of electronic medical records: communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8 (2001) 610-615
28. Margalit R.S., Roter D., Dunevant M.A., et al. Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ Couns 61 (2006) 134-141
29. Finnell J.T., Overhage J.M., Dexter P.R., et al. Community clinical data exchange for emergency medicine patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2003) 235-238
30. In: Aspden P., Corrigan J.M., Wolcott J., and Erickson S.M. (Eds). Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care (2004), National Academies Press, Washington, DC. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10863&page=R1 45-51. Available at: http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id = 10863&page = R1. Accessed March 11, 2008
31. Overhage J.M., Suico J., and McDonald C.J. Electronic laboratory reporting: barriers, solutions and findings. J Public Health Manag Pract 7 (2001) 60-66
32. de Graaf J.C., Vlug A.E., and van Boven G.J. Dutch virtual integration of healthcare information. Methods Inf Med 46 (2007) 458-462
33. Kahn C.E., Carrino J.A., Flynn M.J., et al. DICOM and radiology: past, present, and future. J Am Coll Radiol 4 (2007) 652-657
34. Chiang M.F., Casper D.S., Cimino J.J., and Starren J. Representation of ophthalmology concepts by electronic systems: adequacy of controlled medical terminologies. Ophthalmology 112 (2005) 175-183
35. Hwang J.C., Yu A.C., Casper D.S., et al. Representation of ophthalmology concepts by electronic systems: intercoder agreement among physicians using controlled terminologies. Ophthalmology 113 (2006) 511-519