Comparing indicators of authorial stance in psychology students' writing and published research articles

Journal of Writing Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 245-264

  Henderson, Alice ^a   Barr, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Authorial stance; English; Formulaic expressions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015091627     PISSN: 20301006     EISSN: 22943307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17239/jowr-2010.02.02.8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anthony, L. (2007). AntConc (Version 3.2.1.). Retrieved June 19, 2007, from http: //www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/software.html
2. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO978051 1621024
3. Boch, F., Grossmann, F., & Rinck, F. (in press). Le cadrage théorique dans l'article scientifique: un lieu propice à la circulation des discours [Theoretical framing in the research article: a location where discourse circulates]. In S. Marnette (Ed.), Circulation des discours et liens sociaux: le discours rapporté comme pratique sociale, Actes du colloque international Cit-dit, octobre 5-7 2006 [Proceedings of the Annual Cit-dit Conference, Québec, October 2006]. Québec: NotaBene.
4. British Academic Written English (BAWE) Corpus. Retrieved February 15, 2009, from http: //ota.ahds.ac.uk/headers/2539.xml
5. Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397-423. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
6. Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2008). From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 233-252. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.006
7. Flottum, K., Dahl, T., & Kinn, T. (2006). Academic voices: Across languages and disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/pbns.148
8. Geertz, C. (1988). Words and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press.
9. Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
10. Hunston, S. & Sinclair, J. (1999). A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 74-101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
12. Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 4-21. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
13. Jones, M. & Haywood, S. (2004). Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences: an exploratory study in an EAP context. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences (pp. 269-291). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/lllt.9.14jon
14. Meunier, F. & Granger, S. (Eds.). (2008). Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/z.1 38
15. Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/scl.14
16. nd ed.). (1996). Oxford: Oxford University Press. XML editor (Version 10). Retrieved July 23, 2007, from http: //www.oxygenxml.com/
17. Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 317-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004
18. Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences: acquisition, processing and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. doi: 10.1075/lllt.9
19. Scientext: Un corpus et des outils pour étudier le positionnement et le raisonnement dans les écrits scientifiques. Retrieved April 9, 2010, from http: //scientext.msh-alpes.fr/scientext-site-en/spip.php?article1
20. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.