Expert consensus document: Semantics in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer-results of a modified Delphi consensus procedure

Nature Reviews Urology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 312-322

  Bruinsma, Sophie M ^a   Roobol, Monique J ^a   Carroll, Peter R ^b   Klotz, Laurence ^c   Pickles, Tom ^d   Moore, Caroline M ^e   Gnanapragasam, Vincent J ^f   Villers, Arnauld ^g   Rannikko, Antti ^h   Valdagni, Riccardo ⁱ   Frydenberg, Mark ^j   Kakehi, Yoshiyuki ^k   Filson, Christopher P ^l   Bangma, Chris H ^a   Trock, B ^m   Ehdaie, B ^m   Kim, J ^m   Morgan, T ^m   Hyndman, E ^m   Van Hemelrijck, M ^m   Dasgupta, P ^m   Perry, A ^m   Hugosson, J ^m   Rubio Briones, J ^m   Bjartell, A ^m   Hefermehl, L ^m   Lui Shiong, L ^m   Ha Chung, B ^m   Suk Lee, K ^m   van der Kwast, T ^m   Obbink, H ^m   van der Linden, W ^m   Hulsen, Tim ^m   de Jonge, C ^m   Kattan, M ^m   Xinge, J ^m   Muir, K ^m   Lophatananon, A ^m   Fahey, M ^m   Steyerberg, E ^m   Nieboer, D ^m   Zhang, L ^m   Guo, W ^m   Milan, T ^m   Benfante, N ^m   Cowan, J ^m   Patil, D ^m   Sanford, R ^m   Kim, T K ^m   Mamedov, A ^m   LaPointe, V ^m   Crump, T ^m   Hamoudi, R ^m   Kimberly Duffell, J ^m   Santaolalla, A ^m   Olivier, J ^m   Janetti, E B ^m   Rancati, T ^m   Ahlgren, H ^m   Mascaros J ^m   Lofgren A ^m   Lehmann, K ^m   Han Lin, C ^m   Hirama, H ^m   Jenster, G ^m   Auvinen, A ^m   Haider, M ^m   van Bochove, K ^m   Carter, B ^m   Kirk Burnnand, R ^m   Gledhill, S ^m   Buzza, M ^m   more..

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^g LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^h UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^j MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^k KAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^l EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^m NONE

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CANCER GROWTH; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DELPHI STUDY; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; FINLAND; FRANCE; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; ITALY; JAPAN; MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; CONSENSUS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; EXPERT WITNESS; MALE; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE TUMOR; STANDARDS;

CONSENSUS; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; EXPERT TESTIMONY; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 85014988626     PISSN: 17594812     EISSN: 17594820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.26     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Dall'Era, M. A. et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur. Urol. 62, 976-983 (2012).
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. NCCN http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/ f-guidelines.asp (2017).
3. Morash, C. et al. Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: guideline recommendations. Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 9, 171-178 (2015).
4. Klotz, L. Active surveillance for men with low-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. UpToDate http:// www.uptodate.com/contents/active-surveillance-formen-with-low-risk-clinically-localized-prostate-cancer (2017).
5. Ip, S. et al. An evidence review of active surveillance in men with localized prostate cancer. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. (Full Rep.) 204, 1-341 (2011).
6. Bruinsma, S. M. et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines. Nat. Rev. Urol. 13, 151-167 (2016).
7. Stallinga, H. A. et al. Does language ambiguity in clinical practice justify the introduction of standard terminology? An integrative review. J. Clin. Nurs. 24, 344-352 (2015).
8. Kleynen, M. et al. Using a Delphi technique to seek consensus regarding definitions, descriptions and classification of terms related to implicit and explicit forms of motor learning. PLoS ONE 9, e100227 (2014).
9. Bruinsma, S. M., Bangma, C. H., Obbink, H. & Roobol, M. J. Active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer: the study protocol of the Movember Global Action Plan 3 (GAP3) project [abstract 1036]. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 14, e1036-e1036a (2015).
10. Yeh, J. S., Van Hoof, T. J. & Fischer, M. A. Key features of academic detailing: development of an expert consensus using the Delphi method. Am. Health Drug Benefits 9, 42-50 (2016).
11. Mokkink, L. B. et al. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 6, 2 (2006).
12. Zafar, S. Y. et al. Consensus-based standards for best supportive care in clinical trials in advanced cancer. Lancet Oncol. 13, e77-e82 (2012).
13. Hasson, F., Keeney, S. & McKenna, H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J. Adv. Nurs. 32, 1008-1015 (2000).
14. Bruinsma, S. M. Global action plan on active surveillance for low risk PC: Movember Foundation launches integrated project on active surveillance. Eur. Urol. Today 26, 26 (2014).
15. Pierorazio, P. M., Walsh, P. C., Partin, A. W. & Epstein, J. I. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int. 111, 753-760 (2013).
16. Epstein, J. I. et al. A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. Eur. Urol. 69, 428-435 (2016).
17. Akins, R. B., Tolson, H. & Cole, B. R. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 5, 37 (2005).
18. Schoots, I. G. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur. Urol. 67, 627-636 (2014).
19. Sankineni, S., Osman, M. & Choyke, P. L. Functional MRI in prostate cancer detection. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 590638 (2014).
20. Moore, C. M. et al. Reporting MRI in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer -the PRECISE (Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation) recommendations: a report of a European School of Oncology task force. Eur. Urol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.011 (2016).
21. Powell, C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J. Adv. Nurs. 41, 376-382 (2003).